Pléh Csaba, Lukács Ágnes (szerk.)

Pszicholingvisztika


Hivatkozások

Adams M. J. 1990. Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
van Atteveldt N. M., E. Formisano, R. Goebel, L. Blomert 2004. Integration of letters and speech sounds in the human brain. Neuron 43: 271–282.
van Atteveldt N. M., E. Formisano, L. Blomert, R. Goebel 2007. The effect of temporal asynchrony on the integration of letters and speech sounds. Cerebral Cortex 17: 962–974.
Beauchamp M., K. Lee, B. Argall, A. Martin 2004. Integration of auditory and visual information about objects in superior temporal sulcus. Neuron 41: 809–823.
Berninger V. W., R. D. Abbot, F. Billingsley, W. Nagy 2001. Processes und erlying timing and fluency; efficiency, automaticity, coordination and morphological awareness. In: M. Wolf (szerk.): Dyslexia, fluency and the brain. Timonium, MD: York Press. 383–414.
Bertram R., M. Laine, M. M. Virkkala 2000. The role of derivational morphology in vocabulary acquisition: Get by with a little help from my morpheme friends. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 41: 287–296.
Binder J. R., D. A. Medler, C. F. Westbury, E. Liebenthal, L. Buchanan 2006. Tuning of the human left fusiform gyrus to sublexical orthographic structure. Neuroimage 33: 739–748.
Bitan T., D. Manor, I. A. Morocz, A. Karni 2005. Effects of alphabeticality, practice and type of instruction on reading an artificial script: An fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research 25: 90–106.
Block E. L. 1992. See how they read: Comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers. TESOL Quarterly 26: 319–343.
Blomert L. 2011. The neural signature of orthographic–phonological binding in successful and failing reading development. Neuroimage 57: 695–703.
Blomert L., Csépe V. 2012. Az olvasástanulás és -mérés pszichológiai alapjai. In: Csapó B. – Csépe V. (szerk.): Tartalmi keretek az olvasás diagnosztikus értékeléséhez. Budapest: Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó. 17–86.
Bookheimer S. 2002. Functional MRI of language: New approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annual Review of Neurosciences 25: 151–188.
Booth J. R., D. D. Burman, J. R. Meyer, D. R. Gitelman, T. B. Parrish, M. M. Mesulam 2003. Relation between brain activation and lexical performance. Human Brain Mapping 19: 155–169.
Booth J. R., C. A. Perfetti, B. MacWhinney 1999. Quick, automatic, and general activation of orthographic and phonological representations in young readers. Developmental Psychology 35: 3–19.
Carlisle J. F., J. Fleming 2003. Lexical processing of morphologically complex words in the elementary ears. Scientific Studies of Reading 7: 239–253.
Cohen L., S. Dehaene 2004. Specialization within the ventral stream: The case for the visual word form area. Neuroimage 22: 466–476.
Cohen L., Dehaene S., Naccache L., S. Lehéricy, G. Dehaene-Lambertz, A. Hénaff M. 2000. The visual word form area: Spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain 123: 291–307.
Cohen L., S. Lehericy, C., C. Lemar, S. Rivaud, S. Dehaene 2002. Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area. Brain 125: 1054–1069.
Coltheart M., K. Rastle 1994. Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20: 1197–1211.
Csépe V. 2003. Auditory event-related potentials in studying developmental dyslexia. In: V. Csépe (szerk.): Dyslexia: Different brain, different behavior. New York: Kluwer/Plenum. 81–112.
Csépe V. 2006. Az olvasó agy. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Dehaene S. 2009. Reading in the brain. Hammondsworth: Penguin Viking.
Dehaene S., L. Cohen 2007. Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron 56: 384–398.
Démonet J. F., M. J. Taylor, Y. Chaix 2004. Developmental dyslexia. Lancet 363: 1451–1460.
Dole J. A., G. G. Duffy, L. R. Roehler, D. D. Pearson 1991. Moving from the old to the new: research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research 61: 239–264.
Dubin F., D. Bycina 1991. Models of the process of reading. In: M. Celce-Murcia (szerk.): Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Boston MA: Heinle and Heinle. 195–215.
Durgunoglu A. Y. 2006. How the language’s characteristics influence Turkish literacy development. In: M. Joshi – P. G. Aaron (szerk.): Handbook of orthography and literacy. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 219–230.
Fiez J. A., S. E. Petersen 1998. Neuroimaging studies of word reading. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 95: 914–921.
Georgiou G. K., R. Parrila, T. C. Papadopoulos 2008a. Predictors of word decoding and reading fluency across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Journal of Educational Psychology 100: 566–580.
Georgiou G. K., R. Parrila, J. R. Kirby, K. Stephenson 2008b. Rapid naming components and their relationship with phonological awareness, orthographic knowledge, speed of processing, and different reading outcomes. Scientific Studies of Readin 12: 325–350.
Goodman K. S. 1967. Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist 6: 126–135.
Goswami U. 2003. Why theories about developmental dyslexia require developmental designs. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 534–554.
Harm M. W., M. S. Seidenberg 2004. Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review 111: 662–720.
Holopainen I., T. Ahonen, H. Lyytinen 2002. The role of reading by analogy in first grade Finnish readers. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 46: 83–98.
Klein M. L., S. Peterson, L. Simington 1991. Teaching reading in the elementary grades. Needham Heights MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Landerl K., H. Wimmer, U. Frith 1997. The impact of orthographic consistency on dyslexia: A German–English comparison. Cognition 63: 315–334.
Lyytinen P., H. Lyytinen 2004. Growth and predictive relations of vocabulary and inflectional morphology in children with and without familial risk of dyslexia. Applied Psycholinguistics 25: 397–411.
Mann V., H. Wimmer 2002. Phoneme awareness and pathways into literacy: A comparison of German and American children. Reading and Writing 15: 653–682.
Marsh G., M. Friedman, V. Welch, P. Desberg 1981. A cognitive-developmental approach to reading acquisition. In: T. G. Waller – G. E. MacKinnon (szerk.): Reading research: Advances in theory and practice. Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press. 199–221.
McCandliss B. D., L. Cohen, S. Dehaene 2003. The visual word form area: Expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 293–299.
McCarthy C. P. 1999. Reading theory as a microcosm of the four skills. link.
Morton J. 1969. The interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review 76: 165–178.
Nagy W., V. W. Berninger, R. D. Abbott 2006. Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology 98: 34–147.
Nation K., P. Angell 2006. Learning to read and learning to comprehend. London Review of Education, Special Issue: The psychology of reading 4: 77–87.
Nation K., P. Clarke, C. M. Marshall, M. Durand 2004. Hidden language impairments in children: Parallels between poor reading comprehension and specific language impairments. Journal of Speech, Hearing and Language Research 47: 199–211.
Nation K., M. Snowling 2004. Beyond phonological skills: Broader language skills contribute to the development of reading. Journal of Research in Reading 27: 342356.
Nievas F., F. Justicia 2004. A cross-sectional study about meaning access processes for homographs. Cognitive Development 19: 96–109.
Noble K. G., M. J. Farah, B. D. McCandliss 2006a. Socioeconomic background modulates cognitionachievement relationships in reading. Cognition Development 21: 349–368.
Noble K. G., M. E. Wolmetz, L. G. Ochs, M. J. Farah, B. D. McCandliss 2006b. Brain-behavior relationships in reading acquisition are modulated by socioeconomic factors. Developmental Science 9: 642–654.
Nunan D. 1991. Language teaching methodology. Hertfordshire: Prentice Hall International.
Perry C., J. C. Ziegler, M. Zorzi 2006. Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review 114: 273–315.
Perry C., J. C. Ziegler, M. Zorzi 2010. Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model. Cognitive Psychology 61: 106–151.
Plaut D. C., J. L. McClelland, M. S. Seidenberg, K. E. Patterson 1996. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review 103: 56–115.
Price C. J., J. T. Devlin 2003. The myth of the visual word form area. NeuroImage 19: 473–481.
Pugh K. R., W. E. Mencl, A. R. Jenner, L. Katz, S. J. Frost, J. L. Lee, S. E. Shaywitz, B. A. Shaywitz 2001. Journal of communication disorders. Journal of Communication Disorders 34: 479–492.
Raizada R. D. S., T. L. Richards, A. Meltzoff, P. K. Kuhl 2008. Socioeconomic status predicts hemispheric specialisation of the left inferior frontal gyrus in young children. Neuroimage 40: 1392–1401.
Rastle K., M. Coltheart 1998. Whammies and double whammies: The effect of length on nonword reading. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 5: 277–282.
Rumelhart D. E. 1977. Toward an interactive model of reading. In: S. Dornic (szerk.): Attention and performance IV. New York: Academic Press. 573–603.
Rumelhart D. E., J. McClelland – the PDP Research Group 1986. Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructures of cognition. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Sandak R., W. E. Mencl, S. J. Frost, L. Katz, D. L. Moore, S. A. Mason, R. K. Fulbright, R. T. Constable, K. R. Pugh 2004. The neurobiology of adaptive learning in reading: A contrast of different training conditions. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience 4: 67–88.
Schlaggar B. L., T. T. Brown, H. M. Lugar, K. M. Visscher, F. M. Miezin, S. E. Petersen 2002. Functional anatomical differences between adults and school-age children in the processing of single words. Science 296: 1476–1479.
Seidenberg M. S. 2007. Connectionist models of reading. In: G. M. Gaskell (szerk.): The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 238–250.
Seidenberg M. S., J. L. McClelland 1989. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review 96: 523–568.
Shaywitz B. A., S. E. Shaywitz, K. R. Pugh, W. E. Mencl, R. K. Fulbright, P. Skudlarski, R. T. Constable, K. E. Marchione, J. M. Fletcher, G. R. Lyon, J. C. Gore 2002. Disruption of posterior brain systems for reading in children with developmental dyslexia. Biological Psychiatry 52: 101–110.
Sprenger-Charolles L., L. Siegel, Béchennes D., W. Serniclaes 2003. Development of phonological and orthographic processing in reading aloud, in silent reading, and in spelling: A four-year longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 84: 194–217.
Stanovich K. E. 2000. Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York: Guilford.
Storch S. A., G. J. Whitehurst 2002. Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology 38: 934–947.
Temple C. M. 1997. Developmental cognitive neuropsychology. Hove: Psychology Press.
Tóth V., V. Csépe 2008. Az olvasás fejlődése kognitív pszichologiai szempontból. Pszichológia 28: 35–52.
Turkeltaub P. E., D. L. Flowers, A. Verbalis, M. Miranda, L. Gareau, G. F. Edan 2004. The neural basis of hyperlexic reading. An FMRI case study. Neuron 41: 11–25.
Turkeltaub P. E., L. Gareau, D. L. Flowers, T. A. Zeffiro, G. F. Eden 2003. Development of neural mechanisms for reading. Nature Neuroscience 6: 767–773.
Vaessen A., D. Bertrand, Tóth D., V. Csépe, L. Faisca, A. Reis, L. Blomert 2010. Cognitive development of fluent word reading does not qualitatively differ between transparent and opaque orthographies. Journal of Educational Psychology 102: 827–842.
Vaessen A., P. Gerretsen, L. Blomert 2009. Naming problems do not reflect a second independent core deficit in dyslexia: Double deficits explored. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 103: 202–221.
Wagner R. K., J. K. Torgesen, C. A. Rashotte, S. A. Hecht, T. A. Barker, S. R. Burgess, J. Donahue, T. Garon 1997. Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology 33: 468–479.
Wile T. L., R. Borowsky 2004. What does rapid automatized naming measure? A new RAN task compared to naming and lexical decision. Brain and Language 90: 47–62.
Wu H. C., T. Nagasawa, E. C. Brown, C. Juhasz, R. Rothermel, K. Hoechstetter 2011. Gammaoscillations modulated by picture naming and word reading: Intracranial recording in epileptic patients. Clinical Neurophysiology 122: 1929–1942.
Ziegler J. C., D. Bertrand, Tóth D., V. Csépe, A. Reis, L. Faísca 2010. Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: A cross-language investigation. Psychological Science 21: 551–559.
Ziegler J. C., U. Goswami 2005. Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin 131: 3–29.
Zorzi M. 2010. The Connectionist Dual Process (CDP) approach to modeling reading aloud. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 22: 836–860.

Pszicholingvisztika

Tartalomjegyzék


Kiadó: Akadémiai Kiadó

Online megjelenés éve: 2015

ISBN: 978 963 059 499 8

Az pszicholingvisztika a nyelv használatának, megértésének és elsajátításának mentális folyamatait, a használók értelmi, érzelmi és társas működéseit érintő mechanizmusait vizsgálja. Interdiszciplináris terület, amelynek gyökerei a nyelvészetben és a pszichológiában lelhetők fel. Fél évszázada létezik komolyabb formában, vagyis viszonylag fiatal, ám az elmúlt évtizedekben - az ihletését adó területek, vagyis a nyelvészet, a pszichológia és az idegtudomány elméleti és technikai változásainak, továbbá a nyelv használatát és vizsgálatának lehetőségeit is érintő, gyorsan változó műszaki-informatikai környezetnek köszönhetően - sokrétűen fejlődött.

A Magyar pszicholingvisztikai kézikönyv hiányt pótol a hazai felsőoktatásban, az első próbálkozás arra, hogy teljesen megfeleljen a nyelvre érvényesített interdiszciplináris szemléletnek. Egyszerre jellemző rá a bölcsészeti, a társadalomtudományi és a természettudományos szemlélet alkalmazása, módszerei közé tartozik a megfigyelés, a kísérletezés, és időnként a tömeges adatok elemzése egyaránt.

Könyvünk oktatási anyagként szolgál a felsőbb éves pszichológus, nyelvész, gyógypedagógus, medikus diákok számára, ugyanakkor legalább egy évtizedig érvényes összefoglaló és kiindulási irodalom lehet a kutatóknak is. Őszintén reméljük, hogy a kézikönyv alapvető tananyag lesz nyelvészeti és pszichológiai mesterképzésekben, doktori programokban.

Hivatkozás: https://mersz.hu/pleh-lukacs-pszicholingvisztika//

BibTeXEndNoteMendeleyZotero

Kivonat
fullscreenclose
printsave