Pléh Csaba, Lukács Ágnes (szerk.)

Pszicholingvisztika


Hivatkozások

Albright T. D., G. R. Stoner 2002. Contextual influences on visual processing. Annual Review of Neurosciences 25: 339–379.
Allman J., F. Miezin, E. McGuinness 1985. Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: Neurophysiological mechanisms for local–global comparisons in visual neurons. Annual Review of Neurosciences 8: 407–430.
Altenmüller T. C., T. Marchmann, J. Kahrs, J. Dichgans 1997. Language processing in aphasia: Changes in lateralization patterns during recovery reflect cerebral plasticity in adults. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 102: 86–97.
Amedi A., A. Floel, S. Knecht, E. Zohary, L. G. Cohen 2004. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the occipital pole interferes with verbal processing in blind subjects. Nature Neuroscience 7: 1266–1270.
Amedi A., N. Raz, P. Pianka, R. Malach, E. Zohary 2003. Early “visual” cortex activation correlates with superior verbal memory performance in the blind. Nature Neuroscience 6: 758–766.
Bavelier D., H. J. Neville 2002. Cross-modal plasticity: Where and how? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3: 443–452.
Beeman M. 1998. Coarse semantic coding and discourse comprehension. In: M. Beeman – C. Chiarello (szerk.): Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 255–284.
Beeman M., C. Chiarello 1998. Complementary right- and left-hemisphere language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science 7: 2–8.
Binder J. R., J. A. Frost, T. A. Hammeke, P. S. F. Bellgowan, J. A. Springer, J. N. Kaufman 2000. Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds. Cerebral Cortex 10: 512–528.
Binder J. R., J. A. Frost, T. A. Hammeke, R. Cox, S. J. Rao, T. Prieto 1997. Human brain language areas identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Neuroscience 17: 353–362.
Blasko D. G., V. A. Kazmerski 2006. ERP correlates of individual differences in the comprehension of nonliteral language. Metaphor and Symbol 21: 267–284.
Bookheimer S. 2002. Functional MRI of language: New approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annual Review of Neurosciences 25: 151–188.
Bornkessel I. D., C. J. Fiebach, A. D. Friederici 2004. On the cost of syntactic ambiguity in human language comprehension: An individual differences approach. Cognitive Brain Research 21: 11–21.
Boroojerdi B., K. Bushara, B. Corwell, I. Immisch, F. Battaglia, W. Muellbacher – et al. 2000. Enhanced excitability of the human visual cortex induced by short-term light deprivation. Cerebral Cortex 10: 529–534.
Buccino G., F. Binkofski, G. R. Fink, L. Fadiga, L. Fogassi, V. Gallese – et al. 2001. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience 13: 400–404.
Buchman A. S., D. C. Garron, J. E. Trost-Cardamone, M. D. Wichter, M. Schwartz 1986. Word deafness: One hundred years later. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 49: 489–499.
Buonomano D. V., M. M. Merznich 1998. Cortical plasticity: From synapses to maps. Annual Review of Neuroscience 21: 149–186.
Burton H. 2003. Visual cortex activity in early and late blind people. Journal of Neuroscience 23: 4005–4011.
Cabeza R. 2002. Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: The HAROLD model. Psychology and Aging 17: 85–100.
Cappa S. F., G. Vallar 1992. The role of the left and right hemispheres in recovery from aphasia. Aphasiology 6: 359–372.
Chainay H., A. Krainik, M. L. Tanguy, E. Gerardin, D. Le Bihan, S. Lehericy 2004. Foot, face and hand representation in the human supplementary motor area. Neuroreport 15: 765–769.
Chomsky N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Cohen L., S. Lehericy, C. F. – C. Lemer, S. Rivaud, S. Dehaene 2002. Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area. Brain 125: 1054–1069.
Cooper R. M. 1974. The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology 6: 61–83.
Coulson S. 2006. Constructing meaning. Metaphor and Symbol 21: 245–266.
Coulson S., K. D. Federmeier közlésre elfogadva. Words in context: ERPs and the lexical/postlexical distinction. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.
Coulson S., C. Lovett 2004. Handedness, hemispheric asymmetries, and joke comprehension. Cognitive Brain Research 19: 275–288.
Daneman M., P. A. Carpenter 1980. Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19: 450–466.
Dechent P., J. Frahm 2003. Functional somatotopy of finger representations in human primary motor cortex. Human Brain Mapping 18: 272–283.
Demonet J. F., G. Thierry, D. Cardebat 2005. Renewal of the neurophysiology of langauge: Functional neuroimaging. Physiological Reviews 85: 49–95.
Douglas R. J., K. A. C. Martin 2004. Neuronal circuits of the neocortex. Annual Review of Neursocience 27: 419–451.
Dronkers N. F., D. P. Wilkins, R. D. VanValin Jr., B. B. Redfern, J. J. Jaeger 2004. Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension. Cognition 92: 145–177.
Engle R. W., M. J. Kane 2004. Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. In: B. Ross (szerk.): The psychology of learning and motivation (Advances in research and theory 44). New York: Elsevier. 145–199.
Fadiga L., L. Fogassi, G. Pavesi, G. Rizzolatti 1995. Motor facilitation during action observation: A magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology 73: 2608–2611.
Federmeier K. D., M. Kutas 2000. It’s about time. Brain and Language 71: 62–64.
Felleman D., D. van Essen 1991. Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cerebral Cortex 1: 1–47.
Ferrari P. F., G. Gallese, L. Rizzolatti, L. Fogassi 2003. Mirror neurons responding to the observation of ingestive and communicative mouth actions in the monkey ventral premotor cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience 17: 1703–1714.
Fiebach C. J., M. Schlesewsky, A. D. Friederici 2001. Syntactic working memory and the establishment of filler-gap dependencies: Insights from ERPs and fMRI. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 30: 321–338.
Fiebach C. J., S. H. Vos, A. D. Friederici 2004. Neural correlates of syntactic ambiguity in sentence comprehension for low and high span readers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16: 1562–1575.
Fitzpatrick D. 2000. Seeing beyond the receptive field in primary visual cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 10: 438–443.
Fodor J. A. 1983. The modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Formisano E., D.-S. Kim, F. Di Salle, P.-F. van de Moortele, K. Ugurbil, R. Goebel 2003. Mirrorsymmetric tonotopic maps in human primary auditory cortex. Neuron 40: 859–869.
Gabrieli J. D., R. A. Poldrack, J. E. Desmond 1998. The role of left prefrontal cortex in language and memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 95: 906–913.
Gainotti G., S. Sorbi, M. Miceli, L. Amaducci 1982. Neuroanatomical and neurochemical correlates of cerebral dominance: A minireview. Research Communications in Psychology, Psychiatry, and Behavior 7: 7–19.
Gallese V., L. Fadiga, L. Fogassi, G. Rizzolatti 1996. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119: 593-609.
Gentilucci M., F. Benuzzi, L. Bertolani, E. Daprati, M. Gangitano 2000. Language and motor control. Experimental Brain Research 133: 468–490.
Gernsbacher M. A., M. P. Kaschak 2003. Neuroimaging studies of language production and comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology 54: 91–114.
Grodzinsky Y. 2000. The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca’s area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23: 1–71.
Hagler D. J. J., M. I. Sereno 2006. Spatial maps in frontal and prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage 29: 567–577
Hannon B., M. Daneman 2001. A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology 93: 103–128.
Herz R. S., J. von Clef 2001. The influence of verbal labeling on the perception of odors: Evidence for olfactory illusions? Perception 30: 381–391.
Hickok G., D. Poeppel 2004. Dorsal and ventral streams: A framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition 92: 67–99.
Ivry R., L. Robertson 1998. The two sides of perception. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Josse G., N. Tzourio-Mazoyer 2004. Hemispheric specialization for language. Brain Research Reviews 44: 1–12.
Katz A. 2006. A hitchhiker’s guide to human evolution, the brain, and the processing of language when it is “stretched” from the literal or expected usage. Metaphor and Symbol 21: 199–211.
Katz A. – C. Cacciari – J. W. Gibbs Jr. – M. Turner (szerk.) 1998. Figurative language and thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kayser C., K. P. Kording, P. Konig 2004. Processing of complex stimuli and natural scenes in the visual cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 14: 468–473.
King J. W., M. A. Just 1991. Individual dufferences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language 30: 580–602.
King J. W., M. Kutas 1998. Neural plasticity in the dynamics of human visual word recognition. Neuroscience Letters 244: 61–64.
Kluender K. R. 1998. On the distinction between strong and weak islands: A processing perspective. In: P. Culicover – L. McNally (szerk.): The limits of syntax (syntax and semantics 29). San Diego: Academic Press. 241–279.
Kluender K. R. 2005. Are subject islands subject to a processing account? In: V. Chand – A. Kelleher – A. J. Rodriguez – B. Schmeiser (szerk.): Proceedings of the 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla. 475–499.
Kutas M., J. W. King 1996. The potentials for basic sentence processing: Differentiating integrative processes. In: I. Ikeda – J. L. McClelland (szerk.): Information integration in perception and communication (Attention and performance 16). Cambridge MA: MIT Press. 501–546.
Kutas M., C. van Petten, M. Besson 1988. Event-related potential asymmetries during the reading of sentences. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 69: 218–233.
Lancker Sidtis D. van 2006. Where in the brain is nonliteral language? Metaphor and Symbol 21: 213–244.
Lewis J. W., F. L. Wightman, J. A. Brefczynski, R. E. Phinney, J. R. Binder, E. A. DeYoe 2004. Human brain regions involved in recognizing environmental sounds. Cerebral Cortex 14: 1008–1021.
MacSweeney M., B. Woll, R. Campbell, P. K. McGuire, A. S. David, S. C. Williams – et al. 2002. Neural systems underlying British Sign Language and audio-visual English processing in native users. Brain 125: 1583–1593.
Martin R. 2003. Language processing: Functional organization and neuroanatomical basis. Annual Review of Psychology 54: 55–89.
Meyer M., A. D. Friederici, D. Y. v. Cramon 2000. Neurocognition of auditory sentence comprehension: Event related fMRI reveals sensitivity to syntactic violations and task demands. Cognitive Brain Research 9: 19–33.
Mills D. L., S. A. Coffey-Corina, H. J. Neville 1997. Language comprehension and cerebral specialization from 13 to 20 months. Developmental Neuropsychology 13: 397–445.
Mitchison G. 1991. Neuronal branching patterns and the economy of cortical wiring. Proceedings Royal Society London B, Biological Sciences 245: 151–158.
Mitchison G. 1992. Axonal trees and cortical architecture. Trends in Neuroscience 15: 122–126.
Münte T. F., K. Schilz, M. Kutas 1998. When temporal terms belie conceptual order. Nature 395: 71–73.
Münte T. F., B. M. Wieringa, H. Weyerts, A. Szentkuti, M. Matzke, S. Johannes 2001. Differences in brain potentials to open and closed class words: Class and frequency effects. Neuropsychologia 39: 91–102.
Morton B. E. 2003. Line bisection-based hemisphericity estimates of university students and professionals: Evidence of sorting during higher education and career selection. Brain and Cognition 52: 319–325.
Neville H. J., D. Bavelier 2002. Human brain plasticity: Evidence from sensory deprivation and altered language experienc. Progress in Brain Research 138: 177–188.
Newman A. J., D. Bavelier, D. Corina, P. Jezzard, H. J. Neville 2002. A critical period for right hemisphere recruitment in American Sign Language processing. Nature Neuroscience 5: 76–80.
Nishimura H., K. Hashikawa, K. Doi, T. Iwaki, Y. Watanabe, H. Kusuoka – et al. 1999. Sign language ‘hear” in the auditory cortex. Nature 397:116.
Noppeney U., K. J. Friston, C. J. Price 2003. Effects of visual deprivation on the organization of the semantic system. Brain 126: 1620–1627.
Nudo R. J., W. M. Jenkins, M. M. Merzenich, T. Prejean, R. Grenda 1992. Neurophysiological correlates of hand preference in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience 12: 2918–2947.
O’Mahoney M. 1978. Smell illusions and suggestions: Reports of smells contingent on tones played on television and ratio. Chemical Senses and Flavor 3: 183–189.
Ostrowsky K., M. Magnin, P. Ryvlin, J. Isnard, M. Guenot, F. C. Mauguiere 2002. Representation of pain and somatic sensation in the human insula: A study of responses to direct electrical cortical stimulation. Cerebral Cortex 12: 376–85.
Pascual-Leone A., A. Amedi, F. Fregni, L. B. Merabet 2005. The plastic human brain cortex. Annual Review of Neurosciences 28: 377–401.
Petten C. van, M. Kutas 1990. Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Memory and Cognition 18: 380–393.
Petitto L. A., R. J. Zatorre, K. Gauna, E. J. Nikelski, D. Dostie, A. C. Evans 2000. Speech-like cerebral activity in profoundly deaf people processing signed languages: Implications for the neural basis of human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 97: 13961–13966.
Poeppel D. 2001. Pure word deafness and the bilateral processing of the speech code. Cognitive Science 25: 679–693.
Press D. Z., M. D. Casement, L. R. Moo, D. C. Alsop 2004. Imaging phonological and semantic networks with fMRI. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts. Viewer/Itinerary Planner 80: 13.
Price C. J., J. T. Devlin 2003. The myth of the visual word form area. NeuroImage 19: 473–481.
Rechtschaffen A., S. A. Mednick 1955. The autokinetic word technique. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 51: 346–348.
Rizzolatti G., L. Fadiga, V. Gallese, L. Fogassi 1996. Premotor cortex and recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research 3: 131–141.
Rockland K. 1997. Elements of cortical architecture hierarchy revisited. Cerebral Cortex 12: 243–293.
Roder B., O. Stock, S. Bien, H. Neville, F. Rosler 2002. Speech processing activates visual cortex in congenitally blind humans. European Journal Neurosciences 16: 930–936.
Roehm D., M. Schlesewksy, I. Bornkessel, S. Frisch, H. Haider 2004. Fractioning language comprehension via frequency characteristics of the human EEG. Neuroreport 15: 409–412.
Rugg M. D. 1990. Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high- and low-frequency words. Memory and Cognition 18: 367–379.
Sathian K. 2005. Visual cortical activity during tactile perception in the sighted and the visually deprived. Developmental Psychobiology 46: 279–286.
Schleicher A., P. Palermo-GallagherS. B. Morosan, T. Eickhoff, T. Kowalski, K. de Vos – et al. 2005. Quantitative architectural analysis: A new approach to cortical mapping. Anatomy Embryology 210: 373–386.
Schluppeck D., P. Glimcher, D. J. Heeger 2005. Topographic organization for delayed saccades in human posterior parietal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 94: 1372–1384.
Scott S. K., C. C. Blank, S. Rosen, R. J. S. Wise 2000. Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the frontal lobe. Brain 123: 2400–2406.
Sereno M. I. 2005. Nature news and views: Plasticity and its limits. Nature 435: 288–289.
Sereno M. I., S. Pitzalis, A. Martinez 2001. Mapping of contralateral space in retinotopic coordinates by a parietal cortical area in human. Science 294: 1350–1354.
Sherif M. 1935. A study of some social factors in perception. Archives of Psychology 187: 1–60.
Silver M. A., D. Ress, D. J. Heeger 2005. Topographic maps of visual spatial attention in human parietal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 94: 1358–1371.
St. George M., S. Mannes, J. E. Hoffman 1997. Individual differences in inference generation: An ERP analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9: 776–787.
Stanovich K. E. 2000. Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. Guilford: New York.
Stanovich K. E., R. F. West 1989. Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly 24: 402–433.
Strafella A. P., T. Paus 2000. Modulation of cortical excitability during action observation: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Neuroreport 11: 2289–2292.
Tanenhaus M. K., M. J. Spivey-KnowltonK. M. Eberhard, J. C. Sedivy 1995. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268: 1632–1634.
Thompson-Schill S. L., D. Swick, M. J. Farah, M. D’Esposito, I. P. Kan, R. T. Knight 1998. Verb generation in patients with focal frontal lesions: A neuropsychological test of neuroimaging findings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 95: 15855–15860.
Toga A. W., P. M. Thompson 2003. Temporal dynamics of brain anatomy. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 5: 119–145.
Ueno M., K. R. Kluender 2003. Event-related brain indices of Japanese scrambling. Brain and Language 86: 243–271.
Vogel E. K., A. W. McCollough, M. G. Machizawa 2005. Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature 438: 500–503.
Vos S., T. C. Gunter, H. H. J. Kolk, G. Mulder 2001. Working memory constraints on syntactic processing: An electrophysiological investigation. Psychophysiology 38: 41–63.
Vos S., A. D. Friederici 2003. Intersentential syntactic context effects on comprehension: The role of working memory. Cognitive Brain Research 16: 111–122.
Zipser K., V. A. Lamme, P. H. Schiller 1996. Contextual modulation in primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 16: 7376–7389.

Pszicholingvisztika

Tartalomjegyzék


Kiadó: Akadémiai Kiadó

Online megjelenés éve: 2015

ISBN: 978 963 059 499 8

Az pszicholingvisztika a nyelv használatának, megértésének és elsajátításának mentális folyamatait, a használók értelmi, érzelmi és társas működéseit érintő mechanizmusait vizsgálja. Interdiszciplináris terület, amelynek gyökerei a nyelvészetben és a pszichológiában lelhetők fel. Fél évszázada létezik komolyabb formában, vagyis viszonylag fiatal, ám az elmúlt évtizedekben - az ihletését adó területek, vagyis a nyelvészet, a pszichológia és az idegtudomány elméleti és technikai változásainak, továbbá a nyelv használatát és vizsgálatának lehetőségeit is érintő, gyorsan változó műszaki-informatikai környezetnek köszönhetően - sokrétűen fejlődött.

A Magyar pszicholingvisztikai kézikönyv hiányt pótol a hazai felsőoktatásban, az első próbálkozás arra, hogy teljesen megfeleljen a nyelvre érvényesített interdiszciplináris szemléletnek. Egyszerre jellemző rá a bölcsészeti, a társadalomtudományi és a természettudományos szemlélet alkalmazása, módszerei közé tartozik a megfigyelés, a kísérletezés, és időnként a tömeges adatok elemzése egyaránt.

Könyvünk oktatási anyagként szolgál a felsőbb éves pszichológus, nyelvész, gyógypedagógus, medikus diákok számára, ugyanakkor legalább egy évtizedig érvényes összefoglaló és kiindulási irodalom lehet a kutatóknak is. Őszintén reméljük, hogy a kézikönyv alapvető tananyag lesz nyelvészeti és pszichológiai mesterképzésekben, doktori programokban.

Hivatkozás: https://mersz.hu/pleh-lukacs-pszicholingvisztika//

BibTeXEndNoteMendeleyZotero

Kivonat
fullscreenclose
printsave