Pléh Csaba, Lukács Ágnes (szerk.)

Pszicholingvisztika


Hivatkozások

Acredolo L., S. Goodwyn 1988. Symbolic gesturing in language development: A case study. Human Development 28: 40–49.
Anderson D. E. 2006. Lexical development of deaf children acquiring signed languages. In: B. Schick – M. Marschark – P. E. Spencer (szerk.): Advances in the sign language development of deaf children. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 135–160.
Anderson D. E., J. S. Reilly 2002. The MacArthur communicative development inventory: Normative data for American Sign Language. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 7: 83–106.
Atkinson J., J. Marshall, B. Woll, A. Thacker 2005. Testing comprehension abilities in users of British Sign Language following CVA. Brain and Language 94: 233–248.
Baus C., E. Gutiérrez-Sigut, J. Quer, M. Carreiras 2008. Lexical access in Catalan Signed Language (LSC) production. Cognition 108: 856–865.
Bavelier D., D. Corina, P. Jezzard, V. Clark, A. Karni, A. Lalwani, J. P. Rauschecker, A. Braun, R. Turner, H. J. Neville 1998. Hemispheric specialization for English and ASL: Left invariance–right variability. Neuroreport 9: 1537–1542.
Bellugi U., S. Fischer 1972. A comparison of sign language and spoken language. Cognition 1: 173–200.
Bialystok E., F. I. Craik, R. Klein, M. Viswanathan 2004. Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging 19: 290–303.
Bonvillian J., M. Orlansky, R. Folven 1990/1994. Early sign language acquisition: Implications for theories of language acquisition. In: V. Volterra – C. J. Erting (szerk.): From gesture to language in hearing and deaf children. Berlin & Washington DC: Springer-Verlag & Gallaudet University Press. 219–232.
Bonvillian J. D., M. D. Orlansky, L. L. Novak 1983. Developmental milestones: Sign language acquisition and motor development. Child Development 54: 1435–1445.
Bosworth R. G., K. Emmorey 2010. Effects of iconicity and semantic relatedness on lexical access in american sign language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 36: 1573–1581.
Boutla M., T. Supalla, E. L. Newport, D. Bavelier 2004. Short-term memory span: Insights from sign language. Nature Neuroscience 7: 997–1002.
Campbell R., M. MacSweeney, D. Waters 2008. Sign language and the brain: A review. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 13: 3–20.
Campbell R., B. Woll 2003. Space is special in sign. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 5–7.
Capek C. M., D. Bavelier, D. Corina, A. J. Newman, P. Jezzard, H. J. Neville 2004. The cortical organization of audio-visual sentence comprehension: An fMRI study at 4 Tesla. Cognitive Brain Research 20: 111–119.
Capek C. M., G. Grossi, A. J. Newman, S. L. McBurney, D. Corina, B. Roeder, H. J. Neville 2009. Brain systems mediating semantic and syntactic processing in deaf native signers: Biological invariance and modality specificity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 8784–8789.
Carreiras M., E. Gutierrez-Sigut, S. Baquero, D. Corina 2008. Lexical processing in Spanish Sign Language (LSE). Journal of Memory and Language 58: 100–122.
Casey S., K. Emmorey 2009. Co-speech gesture in bimodal bilinguals. Language and cognitive processes 24: 290–312.
Chamberlain C. – J. Morford – R. Mayberry (szerk.) 2000. Language acquisition by eye. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Corina D. P. 2000. Some observations regarding paraphasia in American Sign Language. In: K. Emmorey – H. Lane (szerk.): The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 493–507.
Corina D. P., H. P. Knapp 2006a. Lexical retrieval in American Sign Language production. In: Goldstein et al. (2006, 213–240).
Corina D. P., H. P. Knapp 2006b. Psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic perspectives on sign languages. In: M. J. Traxler – M. A. Gernsbacher (szerk.): Handbook of psycholinguistics. London & Amsterdam: Elsevier/Academic Press. 1001–1024.
Corina D. P., H. J. Neville, D. Bavelier 1998. A response from Corina, Neville and Bavelier. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2: 468–470.
Corina D. P., L. San Jose-Robertson, A. Guillemin, J. High, A. R. Braun 2003. Language lateralization in a bimanual language. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15: 718–730.
Dye M. W. G., S. Shih 2006. Phonological priming in British Sign Language. In: Goldstein et al. (2006, 241–264).
Emmorey K. 2002. Language, cognition and the brain: Insights from sign language research. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Emmorey K. (szerk.) 2003. Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Emmorey K., H. B. Borinstein, R. Thompson 2005. Bimodal bilingualism: Code-blending between spoken English and American Sign Language. In: J. Cohen – K. McAlister – K. Rolstad – J. MacSwan (szerk.): Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism. Sommerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Emmorey K., H. B. Borinstein, R. Thompson, T. H. Gollan 2008a. Bimodal bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 11: 43–61.
Emmorey K., D. Corina 1990. Lexical recognition in sign language: Effects of phonetic structure and morphology. Perceptual and Motor Skills 71: 1227–1252.
Emmorey K., G. Luk, J. E. Pyers, E. Bialystok 2008b. The source of enhanced cognitive control in bilinguals: Evidence from bimodal bilinguals. Psychological Science 19: 1201–1206.
Emmorey K., S. McCullough, D. Brentari 2003. Categorical perception in American sign language. Language and Cognitive Processes 18: 21–45.
Goldstein L. – D. H. Whalen – C. T. Best (szerk.) 2006. Laboratory phonology 8. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gozzi M., C. Geraci, C. Cecchetto, M. Perugini, C. Papagno 2011. Looking for an explanation for the low sign span. Is order involved? Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 16: 101–107.
Grosjean F. 1980. Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics 28: 267–283.
Hall M., D. Bavelier 2010. Working memory, deafness and sign language. In: Marschark–Spencer (2010, 458–472).
Hall M. L., D. Bavelier 2011. Short-term memory stages in sign vs. speech: The source of the serial span discrepancy. Cognition 120: 54–66.
Hattyár H. 2008. A magyarországi siketek nyelvelsajátításának és nyelvhasználatának szociolingvisztikai vizsgálata. Dotori értekezés, Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem, Budapest. (link; letöltve: 2012. június 15.)
Hickok G., U. Bellugi, E. S. Klima 1998a. The neural organization of language: Evidence from sign language aphasia. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2: 129–136.
Hickok G., U. Bellugi, E. S. Klima 1998b. What’s right about the neural organization of sign language? A perspecive on recent neuroimaging results. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2: 465–468.
Holzrichter A. S., R. P. Meier 2000. Child-directed signing in American Sign Language. In: Chamberlain et al. (2000, 25–4).
Johnston J. C., A. Durieux-Smith, K. Bloom 2005. Teaching gestural signs to infants to advance child development: A review of the evidence. First Language 25: 235–251.
Johnston T., A. Schembri 2013. Corpus analysis of sign languages. In: C. A. Chapelle (szerk.): The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Malden MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 479–501.
Klima E., U. Bellugi 1979. The signs of language. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Lancz E. 1999. Bevezetés. In: Lancz E. – S. Berbeco (szerk.): A magyar jelnyelv szótára. Budapest: Siketek és Nagyothallók Országos Szövetsége. v–xvii.
Lewis M. P. (szerk.) 2009. Ethnologue: Languages of the world. Sixteenth edition. Dallas: SIL International. Online version: link.
Lieberman A. M., M. Hatrak, R. I. Mayberry 2011. The development of eye gaze control for linguistic input in deaf children. In: N. Danis – K. Mesh – H. Sung (szerk.): Proceedings of the 35th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Sommerville MA: Cascadilla Press. 391–403.
MacSweeney M., R. Campbell, B. Woll, V. Giampietro, A. S. David, P. K. McGuire, G. A. Calvert et al. 2004. Dissociating linguistic and nonlinguistic gestural communication in the brain. Neuro-Image 22: 1605–1618.
MacSweeney M., C. M. Capek, R. Campbell, B. Woll 2008. The signing brain: The neurobiology of sign language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12: 432–440.
MacSweeney M., B. Woll, R. Campbell, P. K. McGuire, A. S. David, S. C. Williams – et al. 2002. Neural systems underlying British Sign Language and audio-visual English processing in native users. Brain 125: 1583–1593.
Marentette P. F., R. Mayberry 2000. Principles for an emerging phonological system: A case study of acquisition of early ASL. In: Chamberlain et al. (2000, 71–90).
Marschark M. – P. E. Spencer (szerk.) 2010. The Oxford handbook of Deaf studies, language and education. Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marshall C. R., W. Mann, G. Morgan 2011. Short-term memory in signed languages: Not just a disadvantage for serial recall. Frontiers in Psychology 2: 6–7.
Marshall J., J. Atkinson, E. Smulovitch, A. Thacker, B. Woll 2004. Aphasia in a user of British Sign Language: Dissociation between sign and gesture. Cognitive Neuropsychology 21: 537–554.
Masataka N. 1996. Perception of motherese in a signed language by 6-month-old deaf infants. Developmental Psychology 32: 874–879.
Mayberry R. I. 1993. First-language acquisition after childhood differs from second-language acquisition: The case of American Sign Language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 32: 1258–1270.
Mayberry R. I. 2010. Early language acquisition and adult language ability: What sign language reveals about the critical period for language. In: Marschark – Spencer (2010, 281–291).
Meier R. 2002. Why different, why the same? Explaining effects and non-effects of modality upon linguistic structure in sign and speech. In: Meier et al. (2002, 1–26).
Meier R. – K. Cormier – D. Quinto-Pozos (szerk.) 2002. Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neville H. J., D. Bavelier, D. Corina, J. Rauschecker, A. Karni, A. Lalwani, A. Braun – et al. 1998. Cerebral organization for language in deaf and hearing subjects: Biological constraints and effects of experience. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95: 922–929.
Newkirk D., E. S. Klima, C. C. Pedersen, U. Bellugi 1980. Linguistic evidence from slips of the hand. In: V. Fromkin (szerk.): Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen and hand. New York: Academic Press. 165–198.
Newman A. J., D. Bavelier, D. Corina, P. Jezzard, H. J. Neville 2002. A critical period for right hemisphere recruitment in American Sign Language processing. Nature Neuroscience 5: 76–80.
Newman A. J., T. Supalla, P. C. Hauser, E. L. Newport, D. Bavelier 2010. Prosodic and narrative processing in American Sign Language: An fMRI study. NeuroImage 52: 669–676.
Orfanidou E., R. Adam, G. Morgan, J. M. McQueen 2010. Recognition of signed and spoken language: Different sensory inputs, the same segmentation procedure. Journal of Memory and Languag 62: 272–283.
Petitto L.-A., S. Holowka, L. E. Sergio, B. Levy, D. J. Ostry 2004. Baby hands that move to the rhythm of language: Hearing babies acquiring sign languages babble silently on the hands. Cognition 93: 43–73.
Petitto L. A., R. J. Zatorre, K. Gauna, E. J. Nikelski, D. Dostie, A. C. Evans 2000. Speech-like cerebral activity in profoundly deaf people processing signed languages: Implications for the neural basis of human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 97: 13961–13966.
Polich L. 2005. The emergence of the deaf community in Nicaragua. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Pyers J. E., T. H. Gollan, K. Emmorey 2009. Bimodal bilinguals reveal the source of tip-of-the-tongue states. Cognition 112: 323–329.
Reilly J. S., U. Bellugi 1996. Competition on the face: Affect and language in ASL motherese. Journal of Child Language 23: 219–239.
Schembri A., C. Jones, D. Burnham 2005. Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: Evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and nonsigners’ gestures without speech. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10: 272–290.
Sevald C. A., G. S. Dell 1994. The sequential cuing effect in speech production. Cognition 53: 91–127.
Söderfeldt B., J. Rönnberg, J. Risberg 1994. Regional cerebral blood flow in sign language users. Brain and Language 46: 59–68.
Szabó M. H. 2007. A magyar jelnyelv szublexikális szintjének leírása. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Thompson R., K. Emmorey, T. H. Gollan 2005. “Tip of the fingers” experiences by deaf signers: Insights into the organization of a sign-based lexicon. Psychological Science 16: 856–860.
Vermeerbergen M. – L. Leeson – O. Crasborn (szerk.) 2007. Simultaneity in signed languages: Form and function. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Wilson M., K. Emmorey 1997a. A visuospatial “phonological loop” in working memory: Evidence from American Sign Language. Memory and Cognition 25: 313–320.
Wilson M., K. Emmorey 1997b. Working memory for sign language: A window into the architecture of the working memory system. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 2: 123–132.
Wilson M., K. Emmorey 1998. A “word length effect” for sign language: Further evidence for the role of language in structuring working memory. Memory and Cognition 26: 584–590.
Wilson M., K. Emmorey 2003. The effect of irrelevant visual input on working memory for sign language. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 8: 97–103.
Wilson M., K. Emmorey 2006a. Comparing sign language and speech reveals a universal limit on short-term memory capacity. Psychological Science 17: 682–683.
Wilson M., K. Emmorey 2006b. No difference in short-term memory span between sign and speech. Psychological Science 17: 1093–1094.
Woll B. 2009. How the brain processes language in different modalities. In: A. Esposito – A. Hussain – M. Marinaro – R. Martone (szerk.): Multimodal signals: Cognitive and algorithmic issues. Berlin: Springer Verlag. 145–163.

Pszicholingvisztika

Tartalomjegyzék


Kiadó: Akadémiai Kiadó

Online megjelenés éve: 2015

ISBN: 978 963 059 499 8

Az pszicholingvisztika a nyelv használatának, megértésének és elsajátításának mentális folyamatait, a használók értelmi, érzelmi és társas működéseit érintő mechanizmusait vizsgálja. Interdiszciplináris terület, amelynek gyökerei a nyelvészetben és a pszichológiában lelhetők fel. Fél évszázada létezik komolyabb formában, vagyis viszonylag fiatal, ám az elmúlt évtizedekben - az ihletését adó területek, vagyis a nyelvészet, a pszichológia és az idegtudomány elméleti és technikai változásainak, továbbá a nyelv használatát és vizsgálatának lehetőségeit is érintő, gyorsan változó műszaki-informatikai környezetnek köszönhetően - sokrétűen fejlődött.

A Magyar pszicholingvisztikai kézikönyv hiányt pótol a hazai felsőoktatásban, az első próbálkozás arra, hogy teljesen megfeleljen a nyelvre érvényesített interdiszciplináris szemléletnek. Egyszerre jellemző rá a bölcsészeti, a társadalomtudományi és a természettudományos szemlélet alkalmazása, módszerei közé tartozik a megfigyelés, a kísérletezés, és időnként a tömeges adatok elemzése egyaránt.

Könyvünk oktatási anyagként szolgál a felsőbb éves pszichológus, nyelvész, gyógypedagógus, medikus diákok számára, ugyanakkor legalább egy évtizedig érvényes összefoglaló és kiindulási irodalom lehet a kutatóknak is. Őszintén reméljük, hogy a kézikönyv alapvető tananyag lesz nyelvészeti és pszichológiai mesterképzésekben, doktori programokban.

Hivatkozás: https://mersz.hu/pleh-lukacs-pszicholingvisztika//

BibTeXEndNoteMendeleyZotero

Kivonat
fullscreenclose
printsave