3.3 Phase 2: Identifying Common Patterns of TEDI in the Primary and Secondary School EFL Class (Studies 3, 4, and 5)
Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!
Hivatkozások
Válaszd ki a számodra megfelelő hivatkozásformátumot:
Harvard
Kótay-Nagy Annamária (2026): Differentiating Instruction with Technology in the Hungarian EFL Classroom. : Akadémiai Kiadó.
https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636641764Letöltve: https://mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1365diwt_288/#m1365diwt_288 (2026. 02. 26.)
Chicago
Kótay-Nagy Annamária. 2026. Differentiating Instruction with Technology in the Hungarian EFL Classroom. : Akadémiai Kiadó.
https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636641764
(Letöltve: 2026. 02. 26.https://mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1365diwt_288/#m1365diwt_288)
APA
Kótay-Nagy A. (2026). Differentiating Instruction with Technology in the Hungarian EFL Classroom. Akadémiai Kiadó.
https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636641764.
(Letöltve: 2026. 02. 26.https://mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1365diwt_288/#m1365diwt_288)
The aim of Phase 2 was to identify common practices of TEDI in the primary and secondary EFL class. For this purpose, 3 studies were conducted in a concurrent fashion following a convergent parallel design of mixing methods (Creswell, 2015).
Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!
Hivatkozások
Válaszd ki a számodra megfelelő hivatkozásformátumot:
Harvard
Kótay-Nagy Annamária (2026): Differentiating Instruction with Technology in the Hungarian EFL Classroom. : Akadémiai Kiadó.
https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636641764Letöltve: https://mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1365diwt_289/#m1365diwt_289 (2026. 02. 26.)
Chicago
Kótay-Nagy Annamária. 2026. Differentiating Instruction with Technology in the Hungarian EFL Classroom. : Akadémiai Kiadó.
https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636641764
(Letöltve: 2026. 02. 26.https://mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1365diwt_289/#m1365diwt_289)
APA
Kótay-Nagy A. (2026). Differentiating Instruction with Technology in the Hungarian EFL Classroom. Akadémiai Kiadó.
https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636641764.
(Letöltve: 2026. 02. 26.https://mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1365diwt_289/#m1365diwt_289)
The studies of this phase fell within the confines of classroom research. As Lightbown (2000) formulates, the various classroom research projects share the unifying desire to “identify and better understand the roles of the different participants in classroom interaction, the impact that certain type of instruction may have on FL/SL learning, and the factors which promote or inhibit learning” (p. 438). In order “to understand the intricate tapestry of classroom events” (Dörnyei, 2007, p. 176), they very often involve the mixing of methods such as classroom observations, interviews, and surveys (Dörnyei, 2007; Mackey & Gass, 2005; Nunan, 2005), which in the case of my research project were conducted in Studies 3, 4, and 5, respectively.
Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!
Hivatkozások
Válaszd ki a számodra megfelelő hivatkozásformátumot:
Harvard
Kótay-Nagy Annamária (2026): Differentiating Instruction with Technology in the Hungarian EFL Classroom. : Akadémiai Kiadó.
https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636641764Letöltve: https://mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1365diwt_290/#m1365diwt_290 (2026. 02. 26.)
Chicago
Kótay-Nagy Annamária. 2026. Differentiating Instruction with Technology in the Hungarian EFL Classroom. : Akadémiai Kiadó.
https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636641764
(Letöltve: 2026. 02. 26.https://mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1365diwt_290/#m1365diwt_290)
APA
Kótay-Nagy A. (2026). Differentiating Instruction with Technology in the Hungarian EFL Classroom. Akadémiai Kiadó.
https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636641764.
(Letöltve: 2026. 02. 26.https://mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1365diwt_290/#m1365diwt_290)
While each study sought to answer two specific sub-questions (RQs 3.1–3.6), their main findings were ultimately merged and analysed to answer the overarching RQ 3. In what follows, I first describe the focal participants and settings of the classroom research project, followed by a presentation of the data collection and analysis procedures for each study. Finally, I outline how the outcomes of the three studies were synthesised to answer RQ 3.