Viktor Bérces: Evidence in Criminal Proceedings
›
Chapter VIII. The basic features of the Hungarian evidence system • The means of evidence in general
›
8.8. Prohibitions on evidence
›
8.8.1. Rules on the exclusion of judges

8.8.1. Rules on the exclusion of judges

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

Under the rules of the CPC , a person may not act as a judge if he or she

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

  • has acted as a prosecutor or member of the investigating authority in the case, and is a relative of a prosecutor or member of the investigating authority who has acted or is acting in the case,
  • participates or has participated in the case as a defendant, defence counsel, victim, complainant or as an aider or abettor of such a person, and is a relative of such a person,
  • is or has been a witness, expert or adviser in the case,
  • decided to authorise the gathering of secret information in connection with the case, regardless of whether the information thus obtained was used in the criminal proceedings, or
  • who, for other reasons, cannot be expected to give an unbiased opinion on the case.
 

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

In addition,

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

  • after the indictment, anyone who has acted as an investigating judge in the case before the indictment or in an appeal against the decision of the investigating judge is excluded from further proceedings before the court,
  • the judge who heard the case at first instance is disqualified from sitting at second instance, and the judge who heard the case at first or second instance is disqualified from sitting at third instance,
  • a judge who participated in the decision to set aside, or in the decision to set aside on the ground that it is unfounded, is also excluded from the proceedings which have been repeated following the annulment,
  • a judge who took part in the decision ordering a retrial or in the decision challenged by a retrial is also excluded from the retrial,
  • except in the case of a simplified review procedure, the judge who participated in the decision challenged by the extraordinary remedy is excluded from the extraordinary remedy procedure,
  • a judge whose relative took part in the contested decision is also excluded.1
1 § 14 (1)–(4) para.
chevron_left
chevron_right
Tartalomjegyzék navigate_next
Keresés a kiadványban navigate_next
A kereséshez, kérjük, lépj be!
Könyvjelzőim navigate_next
A könyvjelzők használatához
be kell jelentkezned.
Jegyzeteim navigate_next
Jegyzetek létrehozásához
be kell jelentkezned.
    Kiemeléseim navigate_next
    Mutasd a szövegben:
    Szűrés:
    Kiemelések létrehozásához
    MeRSZ+ előfizetés szükséges.
      Útmutató elindítása
      delete
      Kivonat
      fullscreenclose
      printsave