10.5.1. Conditions for the legality of the accusation

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

The current Be. Chapter I (General Provisions) does not generally contain any criteria for the legality of the charge, but only provides that the court shall judge on the basis of the charge.1 The legislator has thus broken with the tradition of Act XIX of 1998 and refers to the legality criteria in the context of specific rules for each charging document (e.g. indictment).2 I consider this solution to be unfortunate, as the principle of the legality of the charge is an ancillary element of the principle of indictment and should therefore also be regulated at the level of the principle. Nevertheless, the general rule is that an accusation is lawful if it

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

  • is issued by the prosecuting authority
  • is applied to the Court
  • targets a specific person
  • is issued for a clearly defined offence contrary to criminal law
  • initiates legal proceedings.
 

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

The concept of a legal charge therefore covers the minimum formal and substantive requirements without which no legal proceedings can be brought. However, according to consistent judicial practice, if the accuser fails to comply with the legal formalities of the charge, the court is obliged to require him to remedy the deficiencies, and only the ineffectiveness of the request can prevent the proceedings from continuing.3

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

  1. The formal requirement for a prosecution to be legitimate is that it must be brought by a person with active legitimacy in the lawsuit. Under the current Code of Criminal Procedure, in addition to the prosecutor, the substitute private prosecutor and the private prosecutor are also entitled to bring charges, so the prosecutor does not have the exclusive right to bring charges (monopoly of prosecution).4
    • Róth also includes in the concept of legal prosecution, including formal legitimacy, “that the prosecutor and the court before which he or she is prosecuting have jurisdiction and competence in the particular case.”5
    • Belovics argues that an indictment for breach of the rules on jurisdiction and competence does not affect the legality of the prosecution, but is merely a procedural violation that requires the case to be transferred to the court with jurisdiction and competence. It also notes that if the prosecutor general prosecutes the case instead of the juvenile prosecutor or the military prosecutor, the court must be called upon to fill the deficiency in the indictment for lack of prosecution, and if this is not done, the court must dismiss the case. 6
    • In my view, prosecution in the capacity of a prosecutor always meets the requirement of active legitimacy in litigation, and it is for the court to remedy the rules of jurisdiction and competence.
  2. The historical facts of the accusation must include specific facts corresponding to the statutory elements of the offence as classified in the accusation, i.e. at least the place, time and manner in which the act was committed.7 According to Berkes, the description of the offence charged is accurate if the historical facts set out in the charge against a specific person contain all the specific facts corresponding to the elements of the offence charged in the statutory elements of the offence as defined in the charge: the conduct, the place and the time when the offence was committed.8 According to judicial practice, it is not a conceptual criterion of a statutory charge that it uses legal concepts of the statutory facts in describing the offence; it is sufficient if the description of the historical facts is specific to the extent that, assuming that it is proven, it can be inferred that the offence was committed.9 The definition of the content of the charge is particularly important because it defines the framework of the criminal proceedings and the facts that may be examined in the course of those proceedings, both in terms of the subject matter and the persons involved.10

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

  • The criteria for legality must be met not only for public charges, but also for private charges and substitute private charges. Some examples from judicial practice:
    • if the identity of the accused is unknown, there is conceptually no motion, and consequently the private prosecution is not legal;11
    • in the case of defamation, the termination of criminal proceedings is justified due to the absence of a legal accusation, if the indictment for a verbal offence (defamation) does not contain the specific expressions and words used by the accused against the victims, which, if examined, would enable the court to decide on their suitability for defamation and, ultimately, on criminal liability;12
    • in the case of a supplementary private prosecution, the absence of a statutory charge in the context of the preparation of the trial is an absolute ground for dismissing the indictment and subsequently terminating the proceedings.13
1 § 6 (1) para.
2 See § 422, § 726 (4)
3 EBH 2015/B/10.
4 If the victim and the complainant are not the same person in the case of a substitute private prosecution, the complainant does not have the right to bring a substitute private prosecution (RO 2007.79.).
6 Ervin Belovics: A vád törvényessége. [The legality of the prosecution.] www.jak.ppke.hu/uploads/articles/12081/file/T%C3%A9zis.pdf
7 BH 2009.140.
8 György Berkes (2011) ibid. 19.
9 BH 2011.219.II.
10 BH 2005.7.
11 EBH 2012/B/17.
12 BH 2015.120.
13 BH 2012.31.
Tartalomjegyzék navigate_next
Keresés a kiadványban navigate_next

A kereséshez, kérjük, lépj be!
Könyvjelzőim navigate_next
A könyvjelzők használatához
be kell jelentkezned.
Jegyzeteim navigate_next
Jegyzetek létrehozásához
be kell jelentkezned.
    Kiemeléseim navigate_next
    Mutasd a szövegben:
    Szűrés:

    Kiemelések létrehozásához
    MeRSZ+ előfizetés szükséges.
      Útmutató elindítása
      delete
      Kivonat
      fullscreenclose
      printsave