Kovács Kármen

Viselkedési közgazdaságtan

Hivatkozások

Akerlof, G. A. (1997): Social Distance and Social Decisions. Econometrica, 65(5): 1005–1027. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171877

Alderson, A. S. – Katz-Gero, T. (2016): Compared to Whom? Inequality, Social Comparison, and Happiness in the United States. Social Forces, 95(1): 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sow042

Alicke, M. D. (2007): In Defense of Social Comparison. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 20(1): 11–29. https://www.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-psychologie-sociale-2007-1-page-11.htm Letöltve: 2022. március 22.

Alpizar, F. – Carlsson, F. – Johansson-Stenman, O. (2005): How Much Do We Care About Absolute Versus Relative Income and Consumption? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 56(3): 405–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2002.10.007

Amaldoss, W. – Jain, S. (2005): Conspicuous Consumption and Sphisticated Thinking. Management Science, 51(10): 1449–1466. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0399

Andersson, F. W. (2008): Is Concern for Relative Consumption a Function of Relative Consumption? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(1): 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2007.03.008

Antinyan, A. – Horváth, G. – Jia, M. (2020): Curbing the Consumption of Positional Goods: Behavioral Interventions Versus Taxation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 179: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.08.018

Aronsson, T. – Johansson-Stenman, O. (2014): Positional Preferences in Time and Space: Optimal Income Taxation With Dynamic Social Comparisons. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 101: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.01.004

Aronsson, T. – Johansson-Stenman, O. (2015): Keeping Up With the Joneses, the Smiths and the Tanakas: On International Tax Coordination and Social Comparisons. Journal of Public Economics, 131: 71–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.08.004

Arrow, K. J. – Dasgupta, P. S. (2009): Conspicuous Consumption, Inconspicuous Leisure. The Economic Journal, 119(541): F497–F516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02318.x

Becker, G. S. – Murphy, K. M. (2000): Social Economics: Market Behavior in a Social Environment. Cambridge; London: Belknap Press.

Becker, G. S. – Murphy, K. M. – Werning, I. (2005): The Equilibrium Distribution of Income and the Market for Status. Journal of Political Economy, 113(2): 282–310. https://doi.org/10.1086/427463

Bianchi, M. (2010): Interdependent Preferences: Early and Late Debates on Emulation, Distinction, and Fashion. Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Università di Cassino, Working Paper 4/2010. http://dipeg-wpe.unicas.it/dipse/files/wp201004.pdf Letölve: 2018. július 11.

Bilancini, E. – Boncinelli, L. (2008): Ordinal vs Cardinal Status: Two Examples. Economics Letters, 101(1): 17–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2008.03.027

Birdal, M. – Ongan, T. H. (2016): Why Do We Care About Having More Than Others? Socioeconomic Determinants of Positional Concerns in Different Domains. Social Indicators Research, 126(2): 727–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0914-9

Bowles, S. (1998): Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and Other Economic Institutions. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1): 75–111. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2564952

Brekke, K. A. – Howarth, R. B. – Nyborg, K. (2003): Status-Seeking and Material Affluence: Evaluating the Hirsch Hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 45(1): 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00262-8

Bricker, J. – Ramcharan, R. – Krimmel, J. (2014): Signaling Status: The Impact of Relative Income on Household Consumption and Financial Decisions. Finance and Economics Discussion Series, Divisions of Research & Statistics and Monetary Affairs Federal Reserve Board, Washington, D.C. http://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/feds/2014/files/201476pap.pdf Letöltve: 2015. június 20.

Bronner, F. – de Hoog, R. (2018): Conspicuous Consumption and the Rising Importance of Experimental Purchases. International Journal of Market Research, 60(1): 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785317744667

Bucciol, A. – Cavasso, B. – Zarri, L. (2015): Social Status and Personality Traits. Journal of Economic Psychology, 51: 245–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.10.002

Buchanan, J. M. – Stubblebine, Wm. C. (1962): Externality. Economics, New Series, 29(116): 371–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/2551386

Bursztyn, L. – Ferman, B. – Fiorin, S. – Kanz, M. – Rao, G. (2018): Status Goods: Experimental Evidence From Platinum Credit Cards. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(3): 1561–1595. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx048

Butler, A. W. – Carlin, B. I. – Crane, A. D. – Liu, B. – Weston, J. P. (2021): The Value of Social Status. Economics Letters, 206: 109966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109966

Chan, K. (2008): Social Comparison of Material Possessions Among Adolescents. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 11(3): 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750810879039

Charness, G. – Rabin, M. (2002): Understanding Social Preferences With Simple Tests. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3): 817–869. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4132490

Chen, J. – Liu, N. – Ma, S. (2025): How Does Relative Consumption Deprivation Influence Subjective Well‑Being? The Moderating Role of Housing Wealth. Journal of Happiness Studies, 26(44). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-025-00874-8

Clark, A. – Oswald, R. J. (1998): Comparison-Concave Utility and Following Behavior in Social and Economic Settings. Journal of Public Economics, 70(1): 133–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00064-4

Cole, H. L. – Mailath, G. J. – Postlewaite, A. (1992): Social Norms, Savings Behavior, and Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 100(6): 1092–1125. https://doi.org/10.1086/261855

Congleton, R. D. (1989): Efficient Status Seeking: Externalities, and the Evolution of Status Games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 11(2): 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(89)90012-7

Corneo, G. – Jeanne, O. (1994): Conspicuous Consumption and the Existence of Upward Sloping Demand Curves. University of Bonn, Discussion Paper, No. A-461. https://www.wiwi.uni-bonn.de/sfb303/papers/1994/a/bonnsfa461.pdf Letöltve: 2022. május 12.

Cowan, R. – Cowan, W. – Swann, G. M. P. (2004): Waves in Consumption With Interdependence Among Consumers. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 37(1): 149–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0008-4085.2004.008_1.x

Crusius, J. – Lange, J. (2014): What Catches the Envious Eye? Attentional Biases Within Malicious and Benign Envy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55: 1–11, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.05.007

Cunynghame, H. (1892): Some Improvements in Simple Geometrical Methods of Treating Exchange Value, Monopoly, and Rent. The Economic Journal, 2(5): 35–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/2955939

Csíkszentmihályi, M. – Halton, E. (2011): Tárgyaink tükrében: Az vagy, amit használsz. Budapest: Libri Kiadó.

Dolfsma, W. (2002): Mediated Preferences – How Institutions Affect Consumption. Journal of Economic Issues, 36(2): 449–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2002.11506489

Drakopoulos, S. A. (2012): The History of Attitudes Towards Interdependent Preferences. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 34(4): 541–557. https://doi.org/10.1017/S105383721200051X

Duesenberry, J. (1949): Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Eastman, J. K. – Goldsmith, R. E. – Flynn, L. R. (1999): Status Consumption in Consumer Behaviour: Scale Development and Validation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7(3): 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.1999.11501839

Fafchamps, M. – Shilpi, F. (2008): Subjective Welfare, Isolation, and Relative Consumption. Journal of Development Economics, 86(1): 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.08.004

Festinger, L. (1954): A Theory of Social Comparison Processes. Human Relations, 7(2): 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202

Fleissbach, K. – Weber, B. – Trautner, P. – Dohmen, T. – Sunde, U. – Elger, C. – Falk, A. (2007): Social Comparison Affects Reward-Related Brain Activity in the Human Ventral Striatum. Science, 318(5854): 1305–1308. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1145876

Frank, R. H. (1985a): Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for status. New York: Oxford University Press.

Frank, R. H. (1985b): The Demand for Unobservable and Other Nonpositional Goods. American Economic Review, 75(1): 101–116. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1812706 Letöltve: 2018. november 24.

Frank, R. H. (2005): Positional Externalities Cause Large and Preventable Welfare Losses. American Economic Review, 95(2): 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805774670392

Frijters, P. (1998): A Model of Fashions and Status. Economic Modelling, 15(4): 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-9993(98)00030-3

Geiger-Oneto, S. (2007): Elite Brands and Their Counterfeits: A Study of Social Motives for Purchasing Status goods. [Dissertation] Houston: Univeristy of Houston, The Faculty of the College of Business Administration. https://www.bauer.uh.edu/doctoral/.../DissertationMay172007Final.doc Letöltve: 2015. június 21.

Gorga, R. – Leites, M. – Vigorito, A. (2024): Visible Consumption, Income Inequality and Social Comparisons. Evidence From Four Latin American Countries. The Journal of Development Studies, 60(4): 511–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2024.2314120

Grolleau, G. – Mzoughi, N. – Saïd, S. (2012): Do You Believe That Others Are More Positional Than You? Results From an Empirical Survey on Positional Concerns in France. Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(1): 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2011.10.001

Grolleau, G. – Saïd, S. (2008): Do You Prefer Having More or More Than Others? Survey Evidence on Positional Concerns in France. Journal of Economic Issues, 42(4): 1145–1158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2008.11507206

Hámori Balázs (1998): Érzelemgazdaságtan: A közgazdasági elemzés kiterjesztése. Budapest: Kossuth Kiadó.

Hayakawa, H. – Venieris, Y. (1977): Consumer Interdependence Via Reference Groups. The Journal of Political Economy, 85(3): 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1086/260585

Heffetz, O. (2004): Conspicuous Consumption and the Visibility of Consumer Expenditures. Princeton University, Working Paper. http://forum.johnson.cornell.edu/faculty/heffetz/papers/conspicuous.pdf Letöltve: 2015. május 15.

Heffetz, O. – Frank, R. H. (2008): Preferences for Status: Evidence and Economic Implications. In: Benhabib, J. – Bisin, A. – Jackson, M. (szerk.): Handbook of Social Economics. Vol. 1A, The Netherlands: North-Holland, 69–91. Johnson School Research Paper Series No. #05–09. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1155422

Hillesheim, I. – Mechtel, M. (2013): How Much Do Others Matter? Explaining Positional Concerns for Different Goods and Personal Characteristics. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34: 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2012.11.006

Hirsch, F. (1976): Social Limits to Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hirschman, A. O. (1984): Against Parsimony: Three Easy Ways of Complicating Some Categories of Economic Discourse. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings of the Ninety-Sixth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, 74(2): 89–96. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1816336 Letöltve: 2022. március 3.

Hopkins, E. – Kornienko, T. (2004): Running to Keep In the Same Place: Consumer Choice as a Game of Status. American Economic Review, 94(4): 1085–1107. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828042002705

Hopkins, E. – Kornienko, T. (2009): Status, Affluence, and Inequality: Rank-Based Comparisons in Games of Status. Games and Economic Behavior, 67(2): 552–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2009.02.004

Iannaccone, L. R. (1989): Bandwagons and the Threat of Chaos. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 11(3): 431–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(89)90039-5

Kahneman, D. – Diener, E. – Schwarz, N. (1999): Well-Being: The Foundations of hHdonic Psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Keynes, J. M. (1936): The General Theory of Eployment, Interest, and Money. London: Macmillan.

Kovács, K. (2019): A Dynamic Model for Investigating Consumer Utility Derived From Status Goods. Economic and Business Review, 21(1): 57–78. https://doi.org/10.15458/85451.79

Kovács, K. (2020a): Consumer Choice in Rivalry: A Survey on Relative Consumption With Social and Financial Reference Points. Kézirat.

Kovács, K. (2020b): Relative Consumption With Multiple Reference Points Under Uncertainty. Economics and Sociology, 13(4): 61–80. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071- 789X.2020/13-4/4

Lancaster, K. J. (1966): A New Approach to Consumer Theory. The Journal of Political Economy, 74(2): 132–157. https://doi.org/10.1086/259131

Leibenstein, H. (1950): Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumer’s Demand. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64(2): 183–207. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882692

Loewenstein, G. – O’Donoghue, T. (2006): We Can Do This the Easy Way or the Hard Way: Negative Emotions, Self-Regulation, and the Law. University of Chicago Law Review, 73(1): 183–206. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclrev/vol73/iss1/10/ Letöltve: 2022. április 27.

Marshall, A. (1890/1930): Principles of Economics: An Introductory Volume. 8th edition. London: MacMillan.

Mazali, R. – Rodrigues-Neto, J. A. (2013): Dress to Impress: Brands as Status Symbols. Games and Economic Behavior, 82(C): 103–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2013.06.009

Mill, J. S. (1874/1969): Three Essays on Religion. In: Robson, J. M. (szerk.): Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Vol. X. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 369–489.

O’Cass, A. – McEwen, H. (2004): Exploring Consumer Status and Conspicuous Consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(1): 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.155

Pan, C. – Pettit, N. C. – Sivanathan, N. – Blader, S. L. (2014): Low-Status Aversion: The Effect of Self-Threat on Willingness to Buy and Sell. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(11): 708–716. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12261

Pareto, V. (1896–97/1971): Corso di economia politica [Cours d’économie politique]. Torino: Unione Tipographico-Editrice Torinese.

Pigou, A. C. (1903): Some Remarks on Utility. The Economic Journal, 13(49): 58–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/2956866

Pigou, A. C. (1913): The Interdependence of Different Sources of Demand and Supply in a Market. The Economic Journal, 23(89): 19–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2222206

Postlewaite, A. (1998): The Social Basis of Interdependent Preferences. European Economic Review, 42(3-5): 779–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00144-X

Powdthavee, N. (2009): How Important Is Rank to Individual Perception of Economic Standing? A Within-Community Analysis. Journal of Economic Inequality, 7(3): 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-008-9076-1

Rae, J. (1834/1964): Statement of Some New Principles on the Subject of Political Economy. New York: A. M. Kelley.

Rauscher, M. (1993): Demand for Social Status and the Dynamics of Consumer Behavior. Journal of Socio-Economics, 22(2): 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-5357(93)90018-g

Rayo, L. – Becker, G. S. (2007): Evolutionary Efficiency and Happiness. Journal of Political Economy, 115(2): 302–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/516737

Rege, M. (2008): Why Do People Care About Social Status? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 66(2): 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.04.005

Robson, A. J. (1992): Status, the Distribution of Wealth, Private and Social Attitudes to Risk. Econometrica, 60(4): 837–857. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951568

Scitovsky, T. (1990): Az örömtelen gazdaság: Gazdaságlélektani alapvetések. Budapest: Közgazdaságtani és Jogi Könyvkiadó.

Sen, A. (1997): Maximization and the Act of Choice. Econometrica, 65(4): 745–779. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171939

Shao, A. – Li, H. (2021): How Do Utilitarian Versus Hedonic Products Influence Choice Preferences: Mediating Effect of Social Comparison. Psychology & Marketing, 38(8): 1250–1261. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21520

Smith, A. (1759/1979): The Theory of Moral Sentiments. [Reprint] Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Solnick, S. J. – Hemenway, D. (1998): Is More Always Better?: A Survey on Positional Concerns. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 37(3): 373–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(98)00089-4

Tajfel, H. – Turner, J. C. (1986): The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In: Worchel, S. – Austin, W. G. (szerk.): Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall. 7–24.

Thye, S. (2000): A Status Value Theory of Power in Exchange Relations. American Sociological Review, 65(3): 407–432. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657464

Trigg, A. B. (2001): Veblen, Bourdieu, and Conspicuous Consumption. Journal of Economic Issues, 35(1): 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2001.11506342

Van de Ven, N. – Zeelenberg, M. – Pieters, R. (2009): Leveling Up and Down: The Experiences of Benign and Malicious Envy. Emotion, 9(3): 419–429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015669

Van de Ven, N. – Zeelenberg, M. – Pieters, R. (2011): The Envy Premium in Product Evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(6): 984–998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/657239

Van Wee, B. (2021): Accessibility and Mobility: Positional Goods? A Discussion Paper. Journal of Transport Geography, 92: 103033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103033

Veblen, T. (1899/1979): The Theory of the Leisure Class. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Veliz, P. (2017): Social Status. In: The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory. John Wiley and Sons. [e-book] https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118430873.est0760

Verhallen, T. M. M. (1982): Scarcity and Consumer Choice Behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2(2): 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(82)90034-4

Wang, H. – Cheng, Z. – Smyth, R. (2019): Consumption and Happiness. The Journal of Development Studies, 55(1): 120–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2017.1371294

Weaver, K. – Daniloski, K. – Schwarz, N. – Cottone, K. (2015): The Role of Social Comparison for Maximizers and Satisficers: Wanting the Best or Wanting to Be the Best? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(3): 372–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.10.003

Weber, M. (1922/1976): Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. 5. überarbeitete Auflage. Tübingen: Mohr.

Weiss, Y. – Fershtman, C. (1998): Social Status and Economic Performance: A Survey. European Economic Review, 42(3-5): 801–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00137-2

Wood, J. V. (1989): Theory and Research Concerning Social Comparisons of Personal Attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2): 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.231

Yang, W. – Mattila, A. S. (2017): The Impact of Status Seeking on Consumers’ Word of Mouth and Product Preference: A Comparison Between Luxury Hospitality Services and Luxury Goods. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 41(1): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348013515920

Yu, L. (2025): Digital Literacy and Conspicuous Consumption in Rural Households: The More Proficient, the More Frugal. Applied Economics Letters, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2025.2476750

Tartalomjegyzék

Kiadó: Akadémiai Kiadó

Online megjelenés éve: 2025

ISBN: 978 963 664 155 9

Gazdaság

A viselkedési közgazdaságtan napjaink egyik legdinamikusabban fejlődő közgazdasági szakterülete, amely elsősorban a gazdasági aktorok nem racionális döntéseit és viselkedését vizsgálja.

A viselkedési közgazdaságtani ismeretek, kutatási eredmények azonban nemcsak e terület kutatói számára lehetnek érdekesek és hasznosak: alkalmazásuk a vállalatok, a pénzintézetek és a gazdaságpolitikai döntéshozók számára is előnyös lehet.

Ez a könyv egyrészt a viselkedési közgazdaságtan szemléletmódját, kutatási fókuszait és irányait közvetíti, másrészt néhány specifikus, de releváns és aktuális tématerületen keresztül mutatja be az egyének döntési anomáliáit és viselkedésformáit, azok lehetséges okaival, formáival és hatásával együtt. Túl azon, hogy felvázolja a viselkedési közgazdaságtan fejlődéstörténetét és a neoklasszikus közgazdaságtanhoz való viszonyát, általános képet ad arról is, hogy miért térnek el az egyének a neoklasszikus közgazdaságtan által feltételezett racionális döntéshozataltól, és mi okból merülhetnek fel döntési anomáliák. Ezenkívül e kötet néhány specifikus tématerület is érint, például a relatív fogyasztást, az intertemporális döntések komplexitását, a személyes pénzügyek viselkedési közgazdaságtani aspektusait, valamint a diszkontált hasznossági modell anomáliáit és olyan viselkedési vonásokat, mint például a jelen felé torzítás.

Hivatkozás: https://mersz.hu/kovacs-viselkedesi-kozgazdasagtan//

BibTeX EndNote Mendeley Zotero