7.3.3. Analyses of the institutional framework of land and soil administration in the EU
Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!
Hivatkozások
Válaszd ki a számodra megfelelő hivatkozásformátumot:
Harvard
Boros Anita–Koi Gyula (eds) (2025): Sustainability and Law. : Akadémiai Kiadó.
https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636641788Letöltve: https://mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1353sal_3113/#m1353sal_3113 (2026. 01. 16.)
Chicago
Boros Anita, Koi Gyula, eds. 2025. Sustainability and Law. : Akadémiai Kiadó.
https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636641788
(Letöltve: 2026. 01. 16.https://mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1353sal_3113/#m1353sal_3113)
APA
Boros A., Koi G. (eds) (2025). Sustainability and Law. Akadémiai Kiadó.
https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636641788.
(Letöltve: 2026. 01. 16.https://mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1353sal_3113/#m1353sal_3113)
The institutional framework for land and soil protection within the European Union (abbr. EU) is a complex structure involving both EU-level governance and the policies of individual Member States. At the EU level, the European Commission plays a central role in setting policy frameworks and coordinating actions on land and soil protection. This multi-layered framework aims to address soil degradation, contamination, and sustainable land use through the above analysed legislation, policy coordination, and monitoring. The EU’s approach emphasises integration across different sectors, yet the lack of a binding, specific soil protection directive limits the overall effectiveness of its efforts. While the EU sets the overarching policy direction, implementation is primarily the responsibility of Member States. The subsidiarity principle ensures that soil protection measures are tailored to the national and local context, but this leads to disparities in the level of soil protection across the EU. Some Member States, such as Germany and Austria, have comprehensive soil protection laws, while others, like Spain, rely more on general environmental laws.1 A further contrast is that many Southern and Eastern European countries struggle with effective soil governance due to weaker institutional frameworks, limited financial resources, and greater exposure to desertification and land degradation compared to Northern European counterparts.2
Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!
Hivatkozások
Válaszd ki a számodra megfelelő hivatkozásformátumot:
Harvard
Boros Anita–Koi Gyula (eds) (2025): Sustainability and Law. : Akadémiai Kiadó.
https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636641788Letöltve: https://mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1353sal_3116/#m1353sal_3116 (2026. 01. 16.)
Chicago
Boros Anita, Koi Gyula, eds. 2025. Sustainability and Law. : Akadémiai Kiadó.
https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636641788
(Letöltve: 2026. 01. 16.https://mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1353sal_3116/#m1353sal_3116)
APA
Boros A., Koi G. (eds) (2025). Sustainability and Law. Akadémiai Kiadó.
https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636641788.
(Letöltve: 2026. 01. 16.https://mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1353sal_3116/#m1353sal_3116)
When comparing international and EU legislation, the most significant difference lies in the binding nature and enforcement of policies. While international governance frameworks like the UNCCD depend heavily on voluntary cooperation and national implementation, the EU adopts a more structured, regulatory approach with clearer enforcement mechanisms. The EU’s focus on integrating soil protection across various sectors and the requirement for Member States to adhere to specific regulations make it a more effective model in terms of governance and administration. However, international frameworks such as the UNCCD are crucial for fostering global cooperation, particularly in regions with weaker institutional capacities. The challenge for both international and EU governance lies in balancing environmental protection with economic development, especially in agricultural sectors that depend on land and soil resources.
Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!
Hivatkozások
Válaszd ki a számodra megfelelő hivatkozásformátumot:
Harvard
Boros Anita–Koi Gyula (eds) (2025): Sustainability and Law. : Akadémiai Kiadó.
https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636641788Letöltve: https://mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1353sal_3117/#m1353sal_3117 (2026. 01. 16.)
Chicago
Boros Anita, Koi Gyula, eds. 2025. Sustainability and Law. : Akadémiai Kiadó.
https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636641788
(Letöltve: 2026. 01. 16.https://mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1353sal_3117/#m1353sal_3117)
APA
Boros A., Koi G. (eds) (2025). Sustainability and Law. Akadémiai Kiadó.
https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636641788.
(Letöltve: 2026. 01. 16.https://mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1353sal_3117/#m1353sal_3117)
International and EU frameworks for land and soil protection reflect different approaches to governance and legislation. While international agreements promote cooperation and sustainable practices, they often lack binding enforcement mechanisms. The EU’s regulatory model, which integrates soil protection across policy sectors, represents a more cohesive approach with stronger legal obligations for Member States. However, both frameworks face challenges in implementation, highlighting the need for enhanced governance structures to effectively protect land and soil resources globally.
Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!
Hivatkozások
Válaszd ki a számodra megfelelő hivatkozásformátumot:
Harvard
Boros Anita–Koi Gyula (eds) (2025): Sustainability and Law. : Akadémiai Kiadó.
https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636641788Letöltve: https://mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1353sal_3118/#m1353sal_3118 (2026. 01. 16.)
Chicago
Boros Anita, Koi Gyula, eds. 2025. Sustainability and Law. : Akadémiai Kiadó.
https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636641788
(Letöltve: 2026. 01. 16.https://mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1353sal_3118/#m1353sal_3118)
APA
Boros A., Koi G. (eds) (2025). Sustainability and Law. Akadémiai Kiadó.
https://doi.org/10.1556/9789636641788.
(Letöltve: 2026. 01. 16.https://mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m1353sal_3118/#m1353sal_3118)
The EU and its Member States have made notable progress in developing an institutional framework for land and soil protection, but significant gaps remain. The lack of a dedicated, binding Soil Framework Directive weakens the coherence of soil protection efforts at the EU level, leading to disparities in implementation across Member States. While the EU relies on a combination of sectoral policies to address soil degradation, this approach often fails to provide the comprehensive protection that soils need. Moving forward, the proposed EU Soil Health Law may offer a more robust regulatory framework, but effective implementation and stronger enforcement mechanisms will be critical to ensuring its success.