Prior to our study, we utilized the notion of ‘gamerlect’ for marking the gaming expressions used in social media conversations. Veszelszki (2010) questioned whether phrases or abbreviations of ‘digilect’ were considered sociolect, medialect, or just style. If we analyze ‘gamerlect’ expressions separately, we recognize that any online or offline conversation between two gamers in an out-of-game situation behaves as a sociolect because such idiosyncratic language carries cohesive, sociative, and disguising functions at once. Whereas, if the same two gamers play together and thus communicate purposefully, then the language is medialect because it mediates the exact meaning of the gamers’ phrases in the given media form, in our case, the game. Besides, if a casual or non-gamer uses gamer argot items, either written or spoken, it must be a style because the conversation fulfills none of the functions mentioned before, rather just for fun or probable sympathy towards the gamers. We must emphasize that ‘digilect’ is a perfect umbrella term for phrases and emojis in online chatting. However, the unique language of the games significantly differs from the scope of the interpretation of ‘digilect,’ mainly because emojis cannot be pronounced, but almost all gaming words can have a communicative function in a spoken language (Arnold-Stein 2021).