13.3 Results

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

There were altogether 33 evaluative retrospective comments collected from students in the course of the longitudinal study. The comments fall into five broad categories: source language text, problem triggers, target text production, general comments, and comments about the sessions (Table 13.1).
 

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

Table 13.1 The proportion of retrospective comments in each category
Topic
% of comments
SL text and SL text perception
18.2
Problem triggers
27.3
TT production
45.5
General comments
6
Comments about the sessions
3
 

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

Results indicate that students mentioned problems or benefits related to language production of the target language text most often, followed by problem triggers and source text perception.

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

Students were invited to note down both the positive and negative aspects of the interpreting tasks, together with evaluative comments related to their consecutive interpreting performance.

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

Table 13.2 illustrates the proportion of positive and negative evaluative retrospective comments from students. In total, 45.5% of the retrospective comments were positive, while 54.5% of the comments were negative.
 

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

Table 13.2 The proportion of positive and negative evaluative retrospective comments for each category
Topic
Positive comments (%)
Negative comments (%)
Total (%)
SL text and SL text perception
50
50
100
Problem triggers
22.2
77.8
100
TT production
60
40
100
General comments
50
50
100
Comments about the sessions
0
100
100
 

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

The data show that there were both positive and negative comments about the SL text, while comments related to problem triggers were mostly negative. Retrospective comments related to target text production were mostly positive.

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

In order to get an insight into the development of interpreting competence, the comments and topics were broken down into semesters.

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

During the session at the end of the second semester, only two comments were given, both falling into the category of general comments. In the session following the third semester, 17 comments were given, and during the session at the end of semester four, students provided 14 retrospective comments.

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

Table 13.3 shows the proportion of comments in each category at the end of the third and the fourth semesters.
 

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

Table 13.3 Proportion of comments for category and semester
Topic
Session after semester 3 (%)
Session after semester 4 (%)
Total (%)
SL text and SL text perception
83.3
16.7
100
Problem triggers
55.6
44.4
100
TT production
40
60
100
General comments
0
0
0
Comments about the sessions
100
0
100
 

Jegyzet elhelyezéséhez, kérjük, lépj be.!

Results indicate that, as students progress in their training, there are fewer comments related to SL perception and problem triggers, and more comments related to target language text production. In other words, there is a shift of focus from SL comprehension towards TT production, with an additional shift within TT production from content and lexical access problems to intonation and the use of coping strategies.
Tartalomjegyzék navigate_next
Keresés a kiadványban navigate_next

A kereséshez, kérjük, lépj be!
Könyvjelzőim navigate_next
A könyvjelzők használatához
be kell jelentkezned.
Jegyzeteim navigate_next
Jegyzetek létrehozásához
be kell jelentkezned.
    Kiemeléseim navigate_next
    Mutasd a szövegben:
    Szűrés:

    Kiemelések létrehozásához
    MeRSZ+ előfizetés szükséges.
      Útmutató elindítása
      delete
      Kivonat
      fullscreenclose
      printsave