Kertész András

Mire jó a nyelvtudomány elmélete?

Irodalom

Aarsleff, Hans (1970): The history of linguistics and Professor Chomsky. Language 46, 570–585.

Aarsleff, Hans (1971): ‘Cartesian linguistics’: History or phantasy? Language Sciences 17, 1–12.

Abbott, H. Porter (2014): Narrativity. In: Hühn, Peter et al. (eds.): The living handbook of narrativity. Hamburg: Hamburg University. https://www-archiv.fdm.uni-hamburg.de/lhn/node/27.html (letöltve: 2025.01.25.).

Aikin, Scott & Casey, John (2023): Straw man arguments. A study in fallacy theory. London: Bloomsbury.

Aizawa, Kenneth (2025): Compositional abduction and scientific interpretation. A granular approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Anjum, Rani Lili & Rocca, Elena (2024): Philosophy of science. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Allan, Keith (2003): Linguistic metatheory. Language Sciences 25, 533–560.

Allan, Keith (2007): The Western classical tradition in liguistics. London: Equinox.

Al-Mutairi, Fahed Rashed (2014): The minimalist program: The nature and plausibility of Chomsky’s biolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Allott, Nicholas & Lohndal, Terje & Rey, Georges (2021): Chomsky’s ‘Galilean’ explanatory style. In: Allott, Nicholas & Lohndal, Terje & Rey, Georges (eds.): A companion to Chomsky. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 517–528.

Allott, Nicholas & Lohndal, Terje & Rey, Georges (eds.) (2021): A companion to Chomsky. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Andersen, Hanne (2021): Scientific method. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): The Stanford encycopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-method/ (letöltve: 2024.10.30.).

Anderson, Stephen R. & Lightfoot, David W. (2002): The language organ. Linguistics as cognitive physiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Andor József (2004): A Mester és performanciája: Interjú Noam Chomskyval. Alkalmazott Nyelvtudomány 4, 91–109.

Andresen, Julie Tetel (1991): Skinner and Chomsky 30 years later or: The return of the repressed. The Behavior Analyst 14, 49–60.

Andrews, Edna & Kiran, Swathi (eds.) (2025): The Cambridge handbook of language and brain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Anthony, Louise, M. & Hornstein, Norbert (eds.) (2003): Chomsky and his critics. Oxford: Blackwell.

Aoun, Joseph & Choueiri, Lina & Hornstein, Norbert (2001): Resumption, movement, and derivational economy. Linguistic Inquiry 32, 371–403.

Arens, Hans (1969): Sprachwissenschaft: Der Gang ihrer Entwicklung von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart. Freiburg & München: Alber.

Arisztotelész (2023): Organon. Logikai értekezések. Budapest: Gondolat.

Arisztotelész (2024): Metafizika. Budapest: Atlantisz.

Ashton, Natalie Alana & Kusch, Martin & McKenna, Robin & Sodoma, Anna (eds.) (2020): Social epistemology and relativism. London: Routledge.

Bach, Emmon (1965): Structural linguistics and the philosophy of science. Diogenes 51, 111–128.

Bai, Matt (2005): The framing wars. New York Times Magazine (July 17). https://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/17/magazine/the-framing-wars.html (.: 2022.10.17.)

Baghramian, Maria (2019): The virtues of relativism. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 93, 247–269.

Baghramian, Maria & Carter, Adam J. (2020): Relativism. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/relativism/ (letöltve: 2021.02.20.).

Baghramian, Maria & Colina, Annalisa (2020): Relativism. London: Routledge.

Baghramian, Maria (ed.) (2014): The many faces of relativism. London: Routledge.

Baghramian, Maria & Carter, J. Adam & Cosker-Rowland, Rach (eds.) (2025): The Routledge handbook of philosophy of disagreement. London: Routledge.

Baker, Mark C. (2010): Formal generative typology. In: Heine, Bernd & Narrog, Heiko (eds.): The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 285–312.

Bal, Mieke (2017) [1985]: Narratology. Introduction to the theory of narrative. Toronto: Toronto University Press.

Baldauf, Christa (1997): Metapher und Kognition. Frankfurt a. M. etc.: Lang.

Baltin, Mark R. (1987): Degree complements. In: Huck, Geoffrey J. & Ojeda, Almerindo E. (eds.): Discontinuous constituency. Orlando: Academic Press, 11–26.

Bárány István (2001): Utószó. In: Platón: Theaitétosz. Budapest: Atlantisz, 123–266.

Bard, Jonathan B. L. (2008): Waddington’s legacy to developmental and theoretical biology. Biological Theory 3, 188–197.

Bárdos, Dániel & Tuboly, Ádám Tamás (2025): Science, pseudoscience and the demarcation problem. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barnes, Barry & Bloor, David & Henry, John (2002) [1996]: A tudományos tudás szociológiai elemzése. Budapest: Osiris.

Barsky, Robert F. (1997): Noam Chomsky: A life of dissent. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Beall, J. C. & Middleton, Ben (2024): Truth: The basics. London: Routledge.

Beatty, John (1995): The evolutionary contingency thesis. In: Wolters, Gereon & Lennox, James G. (eds.): Concepts, theories, and rationality in the biological sciences. Konstanz & Pittsburgh: Universitätsverlag Konstanz & Pittsburgh University Press, 45–81.

Beaugrande, Robert de (1991): Language and the facilitation of authority: The discourse of Noam Chomsky. Journal of Advanced Composition 4, 425–442.

Beckermann, Ansgar (2001): Analytische Einführung in die Philosophie des Geistes. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.

Behme, Christina (2009): Review of ‘Cartesian Linguistics’ by Noam Chomsky. Metapsychology 13, Issue 36. https://metapsychology.net/index.php/book-review/cartesian-linguistics/ (letöltve: 2022.10.17.).

Behme, Christina (2014a): Evaluating Cartesian linguistics. From historical antecedents to computational modeling. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Behme, Christina (2014b): Biolinguistic Platonism remains an oxymoron. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001765 (letöltve: 2024.06.17).

Behme, Christina & Neef, Martin (eds.) (2018): Essays on linguistic realism. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.

Benfey, Theodor (1965) [1869]: Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft und orientalischen Philologie in Deutschland seit dem Anfange des 19. Jahrhunderts, mit einem Rückblick auf die früheren Zeiten. New York: Johnson.

Berwick, Robert C. & Chomsky, Noam (2016): Why only us: Language and evolution. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Berwick, Robert C. & Chomsky, Noam (2019): All or nothing: No half-Merge and the evolution of syntax. PLoS Biol 17(11), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000539 (letöltve 2024.09.01.).

Bibok, Károly (2021): Argument structure and syntactic alternation: From lexical representations to multiple argument realization and beyond. Akadémiai doktori értekezés. https://real-d.mtak.hu/1231/ (letöltve: 2021. 01.03.).

Bickerton, Derek (2014): Some problems for biolinguistics. Biolinguistics 8, 73–96.

Bierwisch, Manfred (1966): Strukturalismus. Geschichte, Probleme und Methoden. Kursbuch 5, 7–152.

Bierwisch, Manfred (1987): Linguistik als kognitive Wissenschaft. Erläuterungen zu einem Forschungsprogramm. Zeitschrift für Germanistik 8, 645–667.

Bilgrami, Akeel (2018) [2016]: Előszó. In: Chomsky, Noam: Miféle teremtmények vagyunk? Budapest: Kossuth.

Bird, Alexander (2007): What is scientific progress? Noûs 41, 64–89.

Black, Max (1962): Models and metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Black, Max (1977): More about metaphor. Dialectica 31, 431–457.

Bloomfield, Leonard (1926): A set of postulates for the science of language. Language 2, 153–164.

Bloomfield, Leonard (1933): Language. London: Allen & Unwin.

Bloor, David (1976): Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge.

Bloor, David (1983): Wittgenstein: A social theory of knowledge. London: Macmillan.

Bloor, David (2007): Epistemic grace. Antirelativism as theology in disguise. Common Knowledge 13, 250–280.

Bloor, David (2011): Relativism and the sociology of scientific knowledge. In: Hales, Steven D. (ed.): A companion to relativism. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Bloor, David (2016): Relativism versus absolutism: In defense of a dichotomy. Common Knowledge 22, 488–499.

Bloor, David (2020): Relativism and antinomianism. In: Kusch, Martin (ed.): The Routledge handbook of philosophy of relativism. London: Routledge, 388–397.

Boeckx, Cedric (2006a): Linguistic minimalism. Origins, concepts, methods, and aims. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Boeckx, Cedric (2006b): Skeptical linguistic essays by Paul M. Postal. Journal of Linguistics 42, 216–22.

Boeckx, Cedric (2021): Reflections on language evolution: From minimalism to pluralism. Berlin: Language Science Press.

Boeckx, Cedric & Grohmann, Kleanthes K. (2007): The biolinguistics manifesto. Biolinguistics 1, 1–8. http://www.biolinguistics.eu (letöltve: 2021.01.16.).

Boeckx, Cedric (2009): Cartesian biolinguistics. Talk delivered at Sophia University, Tokyo, Japan, July 17, 2009, Solific Lecture Series.

Boeckx, Cedric (2010): Linguistic minimalism. In: Heine, Bernd & Narrog, Heiko (eds.): The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 485–505.

Boeckx, Cedric & Grohmann, Kleanthes K. (eds.) (2013): The Cambridge handbook of biolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Boeckx, Cedric & Martins, Pedro Tiago (2006): Biolinguistics. Oxford research encyclopedia, linguistics, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.20 (letöltve: 2024.12.03.).

Boeckx, Cedric & Hornstein, Norbert (2010): The varying aims of linguistic theory. In: Bricmont, Jean & Franck, Julie (eds.): Chomsky notebook. New York: Columbia University Press, 115–141.

Boeckx, Cedric & Piatelli-Palmarini, Massimo (2005): Language as a natural object – linguistics as a natural science. The Linguistic Review 22, 447–466.

Bogen, Jim (2021): Theory and observation in science. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): The Stanford encycopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/science-theory-observation/ (letöltve: 2024.10.22.).

Boghossian, Paul (2006a): What is relativism? In: Greenough, Patrick & Lynch, Michael P. (eds.): Truth and realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 13–37.

Boghossian, Paul A. (2006b): Fear of knowledge: Against relativism and constructivism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Bognár László & Forrai Gábor (szerk.) (2004): Esszéírás és informális logika. Budapest: Böcsészettudományi Konzorcium. https://mek.oszk.hu/09600/09612/html/S02.3.1.0.html (letöltve 2024.03.30).

Bolonyai Gábor (2002): Platón összes művei kommentárokkal. Holmi. A folyóirat online kiadása. https://www.holmi.org/2002/05/bolonyai-gabor-platon-osszes-muvei-kommentarokkal (letöltve: 2023.03.26.).

Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina & Schlesewsky, Matthias (2007): The wolf in sheep’s clothing: Against a new judgement-driven imperialism. In: Sternefeld, Wolfgang (ed.): Data in generative grammar. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter [special issue of Theoretical Linguistics 33(3)], 319–333.

Botha, Rudolph P. (1983): On the ‘Galilean style’ of linguistic inquiry. Lingua 58, 1–50.

Botha, Rudolph P. (1988): Form and meaning in word formation: A study of Afrikaans reduplication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Botha, Rudolph P. 1989. Challenging Chomsky: The generative garden game. Oxford: Blackwell.

Boucher, Sandy C. (2014): What is a philosophical stance? Paradigms, policies and perspectives. Synthese 191, 2315–2332.

Boyd (1993): Metaphor and theory change: What is „metaphor” a metaphor for? In: Ortony, Anthony (ed.): Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 481–532.

Boyland, Joyce Tang (2021): Review of Kertész, András & Moravcsik, Edith & Rákosi, Csilla (eds.): Current approaches to syntax: A comparative handbook. Language 97, 419–425.

Bracken, Harry M. (1982): Chomsky’s variations on a theme by Descartes. History of Philosophy 78, 35–51.

Bracken, Harry M. (1984): Mind and language: Essays on Descartes and Chomsky. Dordrecht: Foris.

Bresnan, Joan (1982): The passive in lexical theory. In: Bresnan, Joan (ed.): The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 3–86.

Bruner, Jerome (1983): In search of mind: Essays in autobiography. New York: Harper & Row.

Burian, Richard M. (2001): The dilemma of case studies resolved: The virtues of using case studies in the history and philosophy of science. Perspectives on Science 9, 383–404.

Burnyeat, Myles F. (1976a): Protagoras and self-refutation in later greek philosophy. The Philosophical Review 85, 44–69.

Burnyeat, Myles F. (1976b): Protagoras and self-refutation in Plato’s Theaetetus. The Philosophical Review 85, 172–195.

Butterfield, Herbert (1931): The Whig interpretation of history. London: Bell.

Caret, Colin R. (2025): Logical pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Carnap, Rudolph (1931–32): Die physikalische Sprache als Universalsprache der Wissenschaft. Erkenntnis II, 432–465.

Carnap, Rudolph (1934): The unity of science. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, and Co.

Carnap, Rudolph (1950): Logical foundations of probability. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Carnielli, Walter & Coniglio, Marcelo Esteban (2016): Paraconsistent logic: consistency, contradiction and negation. Cham: Springer.

Carnielli, Walter & Malinowski, Jacek (2021): Contradiction, from consistency to inconsistency. Cham: Springer.

Cartwright, Nancy (1999): The dappled world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Castagnoli, Luca (2004): Protagoras refuted: How clever is Socrates’ ‘most clever’ argument at Theaetetus 171a–c? Topoi 23, 3–32.

Cat, Jordi (2017): The unity of science. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): The Stanford encycopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/search/r?entry=/entries/scientific-unity/&page=1&total_hits=2776&pagesize=10&archive=None&rank=0&query=unity%20of%20science (letöltve: 2021.04.05.).

Chakravartty, Anjan (2004): Stance relativism: empiricism versus metaphysics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35, 173–84.

Chambers, Jack K. (2005): Sociolinguistics and the language faculty. In: Déchaine, Rose-Marie (ed.): Language know-how: Canadian perspectives in contemporary linguistics. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 50, 215–239. https://web.archive.org/web/20170809055555id_/http://home.chuhai.hk/~winnieho/index.html/Chomsky&Socioling.pdf (letöltve: 2021.04.05.).

Chang, Hasok (2011): Beyond case studies: History as philosophy. In: Mauskopf, Seymour & Schmatz, Tad (eds.) (2012): Integrating history and philosophy of science. Problems and prospects. Dordrecht: Springer, 109–124.

Charlat, Sylvain & Heams, Thomas & Rivoire, Olivier (2023): Is natural selection physical? In: du Crest, Agatha & Valković, Martina & Ariew, André & Desmond, Hugh & Huneman, Philippe & Reydon, Thomas A. C.: Evolutionary thinking across disciplines. Problems and perspectives in generalized Darwinism. Cham: Springer, 287–296.

Chomsky, Noam (1957): Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.

Chomsky, Noam (1959): Review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language 35, 26–58.

Chomsky, Noam (1965): Aspects of the theory of syntax. The Hague: Mouton.

Chomsky, Noam (1973a): Conditions on transformations. In: Steven R. Anderson & Kiparsky. Paul (eds.): A festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 232–286.

Chomsky, Noam (1973b): Chomsky replies [letter to the editor]. New York Review of Books, July 19, 33.

Chomsky, Noam (1975) [1955]: The logical structure of linguistic theory. New York: Plenum.

Chomsky, Noam (1980a): On binding. Linguistic Inquiry 11, 1–46.

Chomsky, Noam (1980b): Rules and representations. Oxford: Blackwell.

Chomsky, Noam (1981): Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

Chomsky, Noam (1982): The generative enterprise: A discussion with Riny Huybregts and Henk van Riemsdijk. Dordrecht: Foris.

Chomsky, Noam (1984): On language and culture. Noam Chomsky interviewed by Wiktor Osiatynski. In: Osiatynski, Wiktor (ed.): Contrasts: Soviet and American thinkers discuss the future. London: MacMillan, 95–101. https://chomsky.info/1984____/ (letöltve: 2021.01.06.).

Chomsky, Noam (1986): Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger Scientific.

Chomsky, Noam (1987): Reply. Mind and Language 2, 178–197.

Chomsky, Noam (1991): Linguistics and adjecent fields: A personal view. In: Kasher, Asa (ed.): The Chomskyan turn. Oxford: Blackwell, 3–25.

Chomsky, Noam (1993): The minimalist program for linguistic theory. In: Hale, Kenneth & Keysar, Samuel J. (eds.): The view from Building 20. Essays in honour of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–52.

Chomsky, Noam (1995a): The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam (1995b): Mondattani szerkezetek. Nyelv és elme. Budapest: Osiris.

Chomsky, Noam (1997): History and theory construction in modern linguistics. In: Chomsky no Brasil / Chomsky in Brazil: Revista de documenção de estudos em lingüistica teórica e aplicada (D.E.L.T.A.) vol 13 (Número especial).

Chomsky, Noam (2000a): The architecture of language. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Chomsky, Noam (2000b): New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chomsky, Noam (2001): Beyond explanatory adequacy. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 20. Cambridge, MA, Department of Linguistics, MIT.

Chomsky, Noam (2002): On nature and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chomsky, Noam (2004a): The generative enterprise revisited. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Chomsky, Noam (2004b): Biolingistics and the human capacity. Delivered Budapest, 17th May, 2004. https://chomsky.info/20040517/ (letöltve: 2023.01.22.).

Chomsky, Noam (2005): Three factors in language design. Linguistric Inquiry 36, 1–22.

Chomsky, Noam (2009) [1966]: Cartesian linguistics. New York: Harper & Row.

Chomsky, Noam (2012): The science of language: interviews with James McGilvray. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chomsky, Noam (2015) [1965]: Aspects of the theory of syntax. Fiftieth anniversary edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chomsky, Noam (2018) [2016]: Miféle teremtmények vagyunk? Budapest: Kossuth.

Chomsky, Noam & Lasnik, Howard (1977): Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 425–504.

Chomsky, Noam & Lasnik, Howard (1993): The theory of principles and parameters. In: von Stechow, Arnim & Jacobs, Joachim & Sternefeld, Wolfgang & Vennemann, Theo (eds.): Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research. Berlin: de Gruyter, 506–569

Chomsky, Noam & Seely, T. Daniel & Berwick, Robert C. & Fong, Sandiway & Huybergts, M. A. C. & Kitahara, Hisatsugu & McInnerny, Andrea & Sugimoto, Yushi (2023): Merge and the strong minimalist thesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cleland, Carol E. (2011): Philosophical issues in natural history and historiography. In: Tucker, Aviezer (ed.): A companion to the philosophy of history and historiography. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 44–62.

Collins, Chris & Stabler, Edward (2016): A formalization of minimalist syntax. Syntax 19, 43–78.

Collins, John (2009): A question of irresponsibility: Postal, and Chomsky, Gödel. Biolinguistics 3, 100–104.

Collins, John (2023): Generative linguistics:’Galilean style’. Language Sciences. Online first: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101585 (letöltve: 2024.12.20.).

Copi, Irving & Burgess-Jackson, Keith (1996): Informal logic. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Cordes, Moritz & Siegwart, Geo (2024): Explication. In: Fieser, James & Dowden, Bradley (eds.): Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/explicat/ (letöltve: 2025.12.11).

Cseresnyési László (2009): Még egyszer a kútról és a békáról. Gondolatok É. Kiss Katalin előadásának olvasása közben. Magyar Nyelv 105, 401–411.

Cseresnyési László & Kontra Miklós (2024): Empirical linguistics. A cautious obituary. Argumentum 20, 276–286.

Curtis, Gary N. (2022): Fallacy files. https://fallacyfiles.org/whatarff.html (letöltve: 2024.0914.).

Dąbrowska, Ewa (2015): What exactly is Universal Grammar, and has anyone seen it? Front. Psychol. 6:852. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00852 (letöltve: 2024.07.23).

Dales, H. G. & Olivery G. (eds.) (1998): Truth in mathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Danto, Arthur C. (1985): Narration and knowledge: Including the integral text of analytical philosophy of history. New York: Columbia University Press.

Delbrück, Berthold (1880): Einleitung in das Sprachstudium: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte und Methodik der vergleichenden Sprachforschung. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.

Dellsén, Finnur (2016): Scientific progress: Knowledge versus understanding. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 56, 72–83.

Dellsén, Finnur (2018): Scientifc progress: Four accounts. Philosophy Compass. https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/phc3.12525 (letöltve: 2024.10.22.).

Dellsén, Finnur (2024): Abductive reasoning in science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

De Toffoli, Silvia & Fontanari, Claudio (2023): Recalcitrant disagreement in mathematics: An ‘endless and depressing controversy’ in the history of Italian algebraic geometry. Global Philosophy 33:33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372959530_Recalcitrant_Disagreement_in_Mathematics_An_Endless_and_Depressing_Controversy_in_the_History_of_Italian_Algebraic_Geometry (letöltve: 2024.04.10.).

Dékány Éva (2019): Chomsky nyelvészeti radikalizmusa. In: Kenesei István (szerk.): Nyelv, biológia, szabadság. A 90 éves Chomsky jelentősége a tudományban és azon túl. Budapest: Gondolat, 27–54.

Diderichsen, Paul (1974): The foundation of comparative linguistics: revolution or continuation? In: Hymes, Dell (ed.): Studies in the history of linguistics: Tradition and paradigms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 277–306.

Dikken, Marcel den & Bernstein, Judy B. & Tortora, Christina & Zanuttini, Raffaela (2007): Data and grammar: Means and individuals. Theoretical Linguistics 33, 335–352.

Dixon, Mark R. & Small, Stacey L. & Rosales, Rocio (2007): Extended analysis of empirical citations with Skinner’s Verbal Behavior: 1984–2004. The Behavior Analyst 30, 197–209.

Douven, Igor (2021): Abduction. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/abduction/ (letöltve: 2024.12.03.).

Dowden, Bradley (2024): Fallacies. In: Fieser, James & Dowden, Bradley (eds.): Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/fallacy/#Hypostatization (letöltve: 2025.03.10).

Drach, Erich (1963) [1937]: Grundgedanken der deutschen Satzlehre. Frankfurt am Main: Diesterweg.

Drewer, P. (2003): Die kognitive Metapher als Werkzeug des Denkens. Zur Rolle der Analogie bei der Gewinnung und Vermittlung wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisse. Tübingen: Narr.

du Crest, Agatha & Valković, Martina & Ariew, André & Desmond, Hugh & Huneman, Philippe & Reydon, Thomas A. C. (2025): Evolutionary thinking across disciplines. Problems and perspectives in generalized Darwinism. Cham: Springer, 287–296.

Duden (2021): https://www.duden.de (letöltve: 2021.04.05.).

Dudenredaktion (Hrsg.) (2006): Duden. Das Universalwörterbuch. Das umfassende Bedeutungswörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut.

Dudenredaktion (Hrsg.) (2009): Die Grammatik. Unentbehrlich für richtiges Deutsch. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.

Dummett, Michael (1978): Truth and other enigmas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Dupré, John (1983): The disunity of science. Mind 92, 321–346.

Dupré, John (1993): The disorder of things. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Dyson, Freeman (1982): Manchaster and Athens. In: Curtin, Dean W. (ed.): The aesthetic dimension of science. New York: Philosophical Library, 41–62.

Edelman, Shimon & Christiansen, Morten H. (2003): How seriously should we take minimalist syntax? Trends in Cognitive Science 7, 60–61.

É. Kiss Katalin (1981): Brassai Sámuel mondatelmélete. In: Általános Nyelvészeti Tanulmányok XIII. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.

É. Kiss, Katalin (1987): Configurationality in Hungarian. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.

É. Kiss Katalin (1998): A generatív nyelvészet mint kognitív tudomány. In: Pléh Csaba & Győri Miklós (szerk.): A kognitív szemlélet és a nyelv kutatása. Budapest: Pólya Kiadó, 23–39.

É. Kiss Katalin (2005): Brassai Sámuel és a magyar generatív mondatszerkezet. In: Péntek János (szerk.): A nyelvész Brassai élő öröksége. Az 1997. május 22–23–i emlékülés előadásai. Kolozsvár: Erdélyi Múzeum Egyesület, 11–20.

É. Kiss Katalin (2007): A nyelvészet mint természettudomány. Magyar Tudomány 2007/2, 165–172.

É. Kiss Katalin (2009): A 80 éves Noam Chomsky és a chomskyánus nyelvészeti forradalom. Magyar Nyelv 105, 1–8.

É. Kiss Katalin (2026): Mit köszönhet nyelvünknek az elméleti nyelvészet? In: Kertész András & Dávidházi Péter (szerk.): Mit tehet nyelvünk a tudományért? Budapest: Gondolat Kiadó, 68–89.

Ervas, Francesco & Ledda, Antonio & Ojha, Amitash & Giuseppe, Antonio Pierre & Indurkhya, Bipin (2018): Creative argumentation: When and why people commit the metaphoric fallacy. Frontiers in Psychology, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01815/full (letöltve: 2024.08.12.).

Everett, Daniel (2005): Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human language. Current Anthropology 46, 621–646.

Everett, Daniel (2012): Language: The cultural tool. New York: Pantheon Books.

Falguera, José L. & Martínez-Vidal, Concha & Rosen, Gideon (2021): Abstract objects. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): Stanford Encycopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/abstract-objects/ (letöltve 2025.04.25.).

Featherston, Sam (2007): Data in generative grammar: The stick and the carrot. Theoretical Linguistics 33, 269–318.

Featherston, Sam & Winkler, Susanne (eds.) (2009): The fruits of empirical linguistics. Vol. 1: Process. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.

Fedor Anna & Ittzés Péter & Szathmáry Eörs (2010): A nyelv evolúciójának biológiai háttere. Magyar Tudomány 2010/5, 541–548.

Fehér Márta (1983): A tudományfejlődés kérdőjelei. A tudományos elméletek inkommenzurábilitásának problémája. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.

Fehér Márta (2000): Thomas Kuhn tudományfilozófiai ‘paradigmája’. In: Kuhn, Thomas S.: A tudományos forradalmak szerkezete. Budapest: Osiris, 233–250.

Fehér Márta (2002): Utószó. In: Barnes, Barry & Bloor, David & Henry, John (2002) [1996]: A tudományos tudás szociológiai elemzése. Budapest: Osiris, 295–310.

Feyerabend, Paul (2002) [1975]: A módszer ellen. Budapest: Atlantisz.

Fillmore, Charles J. (1992): ‘Corpus linguistics’ vs. ‘computer-aided armchair linguistics’. In: Directions in corpus linguistics. Proceedings from the 1992 Nobel Symposium on corpus linguistics, Stockholm. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter, 35–60.

Fitch, W. Tecumseh & Hauser, Marc D. & Chomsky, Noam (2005): The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition 97, 179–210.

Fodor, Jerry A. & Piatelli-Palmarini, Massimo (2010): What Darwin got wrong. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.

Forst, Rainer (2003): Toleranz im Konflikt. Geschichte, Gehalt und Gegenwart eines umstrittenen Begriffs. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Forrai, Gábor (1987): The role of a metaphor in the birth of generative grammar. Doxa 9, 49–55.

Forrai Gábor (szerk.) (2002): Mikor igazolt egy hit? Budapest: Osiris & Láthatalan Kollégium.

Freeman, James B. (1988): Thinking logically. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Freidin, Robert & Jean-Roger Vergnaud (2001): Exquisite connections: Some remarks on the evolution of linguistic theory. Lingua 111, 639–666.

Friederici, Angela D. (2017): Language in our brain. The origins of a uniquely human capacity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Futuyma, Douglas J. (2010): Two critics without a clue. Science 328, 692–693.

Galilei, Galileo (1960) [1623]: The assayer. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Galison, Peter & Stump, David J. (eds.) (1996): The disunity of science. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Gallow, Dmitri J. (2022): The metaphysics of causation. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/causation-metaphysics/ (letöltve: 2024.06.15).

Garcia-Carpintero, Manuel & Kölbel, Max (eds.) (2008): Relative truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gardner, Howard (1985): The mind’s new science. A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.

Gentner, Deirdre & Goldin-Meadow (eds.) (2003): Language in mind. Advancs in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Giere, Ronald N. (2004): How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science 71, 742-752.

Glausiusz, Josie (2007): Is morality innate or universal? A hardwired moral code leaves a lot of room for interpretation. Discover Magazine May 10, 2007. https://www.discovermagazine.com/mind/is-morality-innate-and-universal (letöltve: 2024.12.02.).

Goodall, Grant (ed.) (2021): The Cambridge handbook of experimental syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goodson, Ivor F. & Gill, Scherto R. (2011): The concept of narrative. Counterpoints 386, 3–16.

Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.) (1978): Universals of human language. 4 volumes. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Grewendorf, Günther (1988): Aspekte der deutschen Syntax. Eine Rektions-Bindungs-Analyse. Tübingen: Narr.

Grewendorf, Günther (1995): Interview mit Noam Chomsky: Über Linguistik und Politik. In: Grewendorf, Günther: Sprache als Organ – Sprache als Lebensform. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 219–236.

Grewendorf, Günther (2006): Noam Chomsky. München: Beck.

Grewendorf, Günther (2007): Empirical evidence and theoretical reasoning in generative grammar. In: Sternefeld, Wolfgang (ed.) (2007): Data in generative grammar. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter [special issue of Theoretical Linguistics 33(3)], 369–80.

Gromm, Roger & Hammersley, Martyn & Foster, Peter (eds.)(2000): Case study method. Key issues, key texts. London: Sage.

Guarini, Marcello (2004): A defence of non-deductive reconstructions of analogical arguments. Informal Logic 24, 153–168.

Haack, Susan (1998): Manifesto of a passionate moderate: Unfashionable essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hagemann, Jörg & Staffeldt, Sven (Hrsg.) (2014): Syntaxtheorien. Analysen im Vergleich. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.

Haider, Hubert (2004): The superiority conspiracy. In: Stepanov, Arthur & Fanselow, Gisbert & Vogel, Renate (eds.): The minimal link condition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 167–175.

Haider, Hubert (2009): The thin line between facts and fiction. In: Featherston, Sam & Winkler, Susanne (eds.): The fruits of empirical linguistics. Vol. 1: Process. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter, 75–102.

Haider, Hubert (2010): The syntax of German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Haider, Hubert (2015): ‘Intelligent design’ of grammars – a result of cognitive evolution. In: Adli, Aria & García, Marco García & Kaufmann, Göz (eds.): Variation in language: System- and usage-based approaches. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter, 205–240. https://www.academia.edu/8869553/Intelligent_design_of_grammars_a_result_of_cognitive_evolution?email_work_card=view-paper&li=0 (letöltve: 2024.08.12.).

Haider, Hubert (2016): The chapter of incredible neglects. Keep calm and use the scientific method. Dept. of Linguistics & Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg, September 2016. https://www.academia.edu/27787403/THE_CHAPTER_OF_INCREDIBLE_NEGLECTS (letöltve: 2020.02.22.).

Haider, Hubert (2018): On minimalist theorizing and scientific ideology in grammar theory. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327601284_On_Minimalist_theorizing_and_scientific_ideology_in_grammar_theory (letöltve: 2020.02.22.).

Haider, Hubert (2024): One language in 7.164 variants? Confessions of a veteran syntactician. https://www.academia.edu/124413146/ONE_GRAMMAR_IN_7_164_VARIANTS_Confessions_of_a_veteran_syntactician (letöltve: 2024.11.08.).

Hale, Mark (2007): Historical linguistics: Theory and method. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Hale, Mark & Reiss, Charles (2008): The phonological enterprise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hales, Steven D. (1997): A consistent relativism. Mind 106, 33–52.

Hales, Steven D. (2014): Motivations for relativism as a solution to disagreements. Philosophy 89, 63–82.

Hales, Steven D. (2020): Self-refutation. In: Kusch (ed.): The Routledge handbook of philosophy of relativism. London & New York: Routledge, 283–291.

Hales, Steven D. (ed.) (2011): A companion to relativism. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Hamans, Camiel & Seuren, Pieter A. M (2010): Chomsky in search for a pedigree. In: Kibbee, Douglas A. (ed.): Chomskyan (r)evolutions. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins, 377–394.

Hamblin, Charles L. (1970): Fallacies. London: Methuen.

Hansen, Hans Vilhelm (2002): The straw thing of fallacy theory: The standard definition of fallacy. Argumentation 16, 133–155.

Hanson, Norwood Russel (1958): Patterns of discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hansson, Sven Ove (2013): Defining pseudoscience and science. In: Pigliucci, Massimo & Boudry, Maarten (eds.): Philosophy of pseudoscience. Reconsidering the demarcation problem. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 61–77.

Harris, Randy Allen (1993a): The linguistics wars. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harris, Randy Allen (1993b): Generative semantics: Secret handshakes, anarchy notes, and the implosion of ethos. Rhetoric Review 21, 125–159.

Harris, Randy Allen (2010): Chomsky’s other revolution. In: Kibbee, Douglas A. (ed.): Chomskyan (r)evolutions. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins, 237–264.

Harris, Randy Allen (2021): The linguistics wars: Chomsky, Lakoff, and the battle over deep structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harris, Zellig S. (1951): Structural linguistics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Harris, Zellig S. (1952): Discourse Analysis. Language 28, 1–30.

Harris, Zellig S. (1957): Co-occurrence and transformation in linguistic structure. Language 33, 283–340.

Haspelmath, Martin (2019): Against traditional grammar – and for normal science in linguistics. https://dlc.hypotheses.org/1741 (letöltve: 2020. 02. 20.).

Haufe, Chris (2023): Do the humanities create knowledge? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hauser, Marc D. & Chomsky, Noam & Fitch, W. N. Tecumseh (2002): The faculty of language: What it is, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569–1579.

Heisenberg, Werner (1958): Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.

Helong, Tong (2023): The development of the architecture of grammar. In: Deming, Mei & Helong, Tong (eds.): The development of Chomskyan generative grammar. From the Standard Theory to the Minimalist Program. London: Routledge, 1–16.

Hesse, Mary (1980): Revolutions and reconstructions in the philosophy of science. Brighton: The Harvester Press.

Hempel, Carl G. (1965): Aspects of scientific explanation. In: Hempel, Carl G.: Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York: Free Press, 331–496.

Hinzen, Wolfram (2017): Philosophie der Linguistik. In: Lohse, Simon & Reydon, Thomas (Hrsg.) (2017): Grundriss Wissenschaftsphilosophie. Philosophien der Einzelwissenschaften. Hamburg: Meiner, 511–541.

Hintikka, Jaakko (1970): Information, deduction, and the ‘a priori’. Noûs 4, 135–152.

Hjelmslev, Louis (1969): Prolegomena to a theory of language. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.

Hollis, Martin & Lukes, Steven (eds.) (1982): Rationality and relativism. Oxford: Blackwell.

Hornstein, Norbert (2005): Logical form. From GB to minimalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hornstein, Norbert (2019): The stupendous success of the minimalist program. In: Kertész, András & Moravcsik, Edith & Rákosi, Csilla (eds.) (2019): Current approaches to syntax: A comparative handbook. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter Mouton, 187–214.

Hornstein, Norbert (2024). The merge hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hornstein, Norbert & Nunes, Jairo & Grohmann, Kleanthes K. (2005): Understanding minimalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hornstein, Norbert & Lasnik, Howard & Patel-Grosz, Pitty & Yang, Charles (2018): Introduction. In: Hornstein, Norbert & Lasnik, Howard & Patel-Grosz, Pitty & Yang, Charles (eds.) (2018): Syntactic structures after 60 years. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter Mouton, 123–130.

Huang, Yan (2000): Anaphora. A cross-linguistic study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Huck, Geoffrey J. & Goldsmith, John A. (1995): Ideology and linguistic theory: Noam Chomsky and the deep structure debates. London & New York: Routledge.

Hühn, Peter et al. (eds.) (2014): The living handbook of narrativity. Hamburg: Hamburg University. https://www-archiv.fdm.uni-hamburg.de/lhn/index.html (letöltve: 2025.01.25.).

Hume, David (2006) [1739]: Értekezés az emberi értelemről. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.

Hurley, Patrick (2003): A concise introduction to logic. Belmont CA: Wadsworth.

Husserl, Edmund (1970) [1936]: The crisis of european sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Hymes, Dell (1974): Tradition and paradigms. In: Hymes, Dell (ed.): Studies in the history of linguistics: Tradition and paradigms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1–40.

Hymes, Dell & Fought, John (1981) [1975]: American structuralism. The Hague: Mouton.

Ibbotson, Paul & Tomasello, Michael (2026): Evidence rebuts Chomsky’s theory of language learning. Scientific American September 7, 2016. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/evidence-rebuts-chomsky-s-theory-of-language-learning/ (letöltve 2025.08.12).

Imrényi András (2019): Kertész, András & Moravcsik, Edith & Rákosi, Csilla (eds.): Current approaches to syntax. A comparative handbook. Magyar Nyelv 115, 479–485.

Irlenborn, Bernd (2016): Relativismus. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter.

Isac, Daniela & Reiss, Charles (2008): I-language: An introduction to linguistics as cognitive science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Italian Journal of Linguistics 37 (2025) 1. https://www.italian-journal-linguistics.com/current-issue/ (letöltve: 2025.10.02).

Itkonen, Esa (1978): Grammatical theory and metascience. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.

Itkonen, Esa (2002): Linguistics as a system of distinct types of ontology-cum-methodology. In: Gärdenfors, Peter & Woleński, Jan & Kijania-Placek, Katarzyna (eds.): In the scope of logic, methodology and philosophy of science. Dordrecht: Springer, 431–441.

Itkonen, Esa (2003): What is language? A study in the philosophy of linguistics. Turku: University of Turku.

Itkonen, Esa (2013a): Philosophy of linguistics. In: Allan, Keith (ed.): The Oxford handbook of the history of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 747–774.

Itkonen, Esa (2013b): On explanation in linguistics. Energeia V, 10–40.

Itkonen, Esa (2020): Three models for linguistics: Newtonian mechanics, Darwinism, axiomatics. In: Nefdt, Ryan M. & Klippi, Carita & Karstens, Bart (eds.): The philosophy and science of language: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 195–212.

Jackendoff, Ray & Pinker (2005): The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language. Cognition 97, 211–225.

Jäger, Ludwig (1993): „Language, what ever that may be.” Die Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft als Erosionsgeschichte ihres Gegenstandes. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 12, 77–106.

Jäkel, Olaf (1997): Metaphern in abstrakten Diskurs-Domänen. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.

Jahn, Manfred (2021): Narratology 2.3: A guide to the theory of narrative. English Department, University of Cologne. www.uni-koeln.de/~ame02/pppn.pdf. [letöltve: 2025.04.20.].

Johnson, David E. & Postal, Paul M. (1980): Arc pair grammar. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Johnson, Kyle David (2019): Suppressed evidence. In: Robert Arp & Steven Barbone & Michael Bruce (eds.): Bad arguments: 100 of the most important fallacies in Western philosophy. London: Wiley, 399–402

Johnson, Ralph H. & Blair, Anthony (1983): Logical self-defence. Toronto: McGraw-Hill.

Joseph, John E. (1995): The structure of linguistic revolutions. Historiographia Linguistica 22, 379–399.

Kampis György (2022): Tudományfilozófia. Budapest: Typotex.

Kantner, Joanne M. (2008): The only absolute truth in mathematics is the myth of mathematics as universal. Perspectives: The New York Journal of Adult Learning 6 (2). New York: Fordam University, 49–53.

Katz, Jack (2001): Analytic Induction. In: Smelser, Neil J. & Baltes, Paul B. (eds.): International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Elsevier, 480–484.

Katz, Jerrold J. (1981): Language and other abstract objects. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.

Katz, Jerrold J. (1996): The unfinished Chomskyan revolution. Mind & Language 11, 270–294.

Katz, Jerrold J. (ed.) (1985): The philosophy of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Katz, Jerrold J. & Postal, Paul M. (1991): Realism vs. conceptualism in linguistics. Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 515–554.

Katzir, Roni & O’Donnell, Timothy J. & Rasin, Ezer (eds.) (2021): Special issue on simplicity in grammar learning. Journal of Language Modelling Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021), https://jlm.ipipan.waw.pl/index.php/JLM/issue/view/25/26 (letöltve: 2024.10.30.).

Keeling, Evan (2020): Logical oddities in Protagorean relativism. Rhizomata 10, 215–237.

Kellert, Stephen H. & Longino, Helen & Waters, C. Kenneth (eds.) (2006): Scientific pluralism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Kelly, Thomas (2023): Bias: A philosophical study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kempson, Ruth & Fernando, Tim & Asher, Nicholas (eds.) (2012): Philosophy of linguistics. Amsterdam: North Holland.

Kepser, Stephan & Reis, Marga (eds.) (2005): Linguistic evidence. Empirical, theoretical and computational perspectives. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.

Kertész, András (2004a): Cognitive semantics and scientific knowledge. Case studies in the cognitive science of science. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.

Kertész, András (2004b): Philosophie der Linguistik. Studien zur naturalisierten Wissenschaftstheorie. Tübingen: Narr.

Kertész, András (2012): The ‘Galilean style in science’ and the inconsistency of linguistic theorizing. Foundations of Science 17, 91–108.

Kertész, András (2013) [1991]: Die Modularität der Wissenschaft. Konzeptuelle und soziale Prinzipien linguistischer Erkenntnis. Berlin: Springer.

Kertész, András (2015): The puzzle of thought Experiments in conceptual metaphor research. Foundations of Science 20, 147–174.

Kertész, András (2019): Fallacies in the historiography of generative linguistics. Foundations of Science 24, 775–801.

Kertész András (2020) [2015]: Plauzibilis érvelés a generatív nyelvészet történetében. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. https://mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m598peagnt_book1 (letöltve: 2021.01.22.).

Kertész András (2021) [2001]: Nyelvészet és tudományelmélet. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. https://mersz.hu/kertesz-nyelveszet-es-tudomanyelmelet (letöltve: 2024.11.12.).

Kertész András (2026): The paradox of thought experiments in pragmatics. Cham: Springer

Kertész András & Rákosi Csilla & Bódog Alexa (2006): A saussure-i strukturalizmus tudománytörténeti rekonstrukciójáról. Magyar Nyelv CII, 430–442.

Kertész, András & Rákosi, Csilla (2009): Cyclic vs. circular argumentation in the conceptual metaphor theory. Cognitive Linguistics 20, 703–732.

Kertész, András & Rákosi, Csilla (2016): On the inferential structure of indirect reports. In: Capone, Alessandro & Kiefer, Ferenc & Lo Piparo, Franco (eds.): Indirect reports and pragmatics: Interdisciplinary studies. Cham: Springer, 435–470

Kertész, András & Rákosi, Csilla (2019) [2012]: Data and evidence in linguistics: A plausible argumentation model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kertész András & Rákosi Csilla (2020) [2008]: Adatok és plauzibilis érvelés a nyelvészetben. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó https://mersz.hu/hivatkozas/m599aepean_book1#m599aepean_book1 (letöltve: 2024.11.30.).

Kertész, András & Rákosi, Csilla (2020): Megjegyzések a generatív szintaxis parakonzisztenciájához. In: Kenesei István & Dékány Éva & Halm Tamás & Surányi Balázs (szerk.): Általános nyelvészeti tanulmányok 32. Újabb eredmények a grammatikaelmélet, nyelvtörténet és uralisztika köréből. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 137–153.

Kertész, András & Rákosi, Csilla (2022): Inconsistency in linguistic theorising. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kertész, András & Rákosi, Csilla (2023): Inconsistency in conceptual metaphor theory. Cognitive Semantics 9, 387–417

Kertész, András & Moravcsik, Edith & Rákosi, Csilla (eds.) (2019): Current approaches to syntax: A comparative handbook. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.

Kertész, András & Rákosi, Csilla (eds.) (2014): The evidential basis of linguistic argumentation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.

Kertész, András & Rákosi, Csilla (eds.) (2026): Diverging evidence in semantics and pragmatics. Toronto: Toronto University Press.

Kiefer Ferenc (1983): Az előfeltevések elmélete. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.

Kiefer Ferenc (2007): Jelentéselmélet. Budapest: Corvina.

King, Preston (1976): Toleration. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Kiparsky, Paul (1974): From paleogrammarians to neogrammarians. In: Hymes, Dell (ed.): Studies in the history of linguistics: traditions and paradigms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 335– 341.

Kirkham, Richard L. (1992): Theories of truth. A critical introduction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Kiss, Tibor & Alexiadou, Artemis (2015): Syntax – the state of a controversial art. In: Kiss, Tibor & Alexiadou, Artemis (eds.): Syntax – theory and analysis. An international handbook. Volume 1. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter Mouton, 1–14.

Klausenburger, Jürgen (1983): Review of Botha, R., ‘On the ‘Galilean style’ of linguistic inquiry’. Language 59, 434.

Kölbel, Max (2011): Global relativism and self-refutation. In: Hales, Steven D. (ed.): A companion to relativism. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 11–30.

Koerner, E. F. Konrad (1978): Toward a historiography of linguistics. 19th and 20th century paradigms. In: Koerner, E. F. Konrad: Toward a historiography of linguistics. Selected Essays. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins, 21–54.

Koerner, E. F. Konrad (1973): Ferdinand de Saussure: Origin and development of his linguistic thought in Western studies of language. Braunschweig: Vieweg.

Koerner, E. F. Konrad (1983): The Chomskyan ‘revolution’ and its historiography: A few critical remarks. Language & Communication 3, 147–169.

Koerner, E. F. Konrad (1989): The Chomskyan ‘revolution’ and its historiography: Observations of a bystander. In: Koerner, E. F. Konrad: Practicing linguistic historiography: Selected essays. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins, 101–146.

Koerner, E. F. Konrad (2004): Linguistics and revolution: With particular reference to the ‘Chomskyan revolution’. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 106, 3–62.

Koerner, E. F. Konrad (2006): The development of linguistic historiography – History, methodology, and present state. In: Auroux, Sylvain & Koerner, E. F. Konrad & Niederehe, Hans–Josef & Versteegh, Kees (eds.): History of the language sciences. An International handbook on the evolution of the study of language from the beginnings to the present. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter, 2802–2820.

Koszowy, Marcin & Walton, Douglas (2019): Epistemic and deontic authority in the argumentum ad verecundiam. Pragmatics and Society 10, 151–179

Krausz, Michael (ed.) (2010): Relativism. A contemporary anthology. New York: Columbia University Press.

Kuhn, Thomas S. (1957): The Copernican revolution: Planetary astronomy in the development of Western thought. Cambridge, MA.

Kuhn, Thomas S. (1993): Metaphor in science. In: Ortony, Andrew (ed.): Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 533–543.

Kuhn, Thomas S. (2000) [1970]: A tudományos forradalmak szerkezete. Budapest: Osiris.

Kuhlmann, Meinhard (2017): Allgemeine Wissenschaftsphilosophie und die Philosophien der Einzelwissenschaften. In: Lohse, Simon & Reydon, Thomas (Hrsg.): Grundriss Wissenschaftsphilosophie. Philosophien der Einzelwissenschaften. Hamburg: Meiner, 17–50.

Kusch, Martin (2019): Relativist stances, virtues and vices. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 93, 271–291.

Kusch, Martin (2020): Introduction. In: Kusch, Martin (ed.) (2020): The Routeldge handbook of philosophy of relativism. London & New York: Routledge, 1–7.

Kusch, Martin (2021): Relativism in the philosophy of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kusch, Martin (ed.) (2020): The Routledge handbook of philosophy of relativism. London & New York: Routledge.

Kutrovácz Gábor & Láng Benedek & Zemplén Gábor (2008): A tudomány határai. Budapest: Typotex.

Lakatos, Imre (1970): Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In: Lakatos, Imre & Musgrave, Alan (eds.): Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 91–195.

Lakatos, Imre (1971): History of science and its rational reconstruction. In: PSA 1970. Boston studies in the philosophy of science, vol 8. Dordrecht: Springer, 91–136.

Lakatos Imre (1997): Lakatos Imre filozófiai írásai. Budapest: Atlantisz.

Laki János (1998): Empirikus adatok, metodológia, gondolkodás és nyelv a XX. századi tudományfilozófiában. In: Laki János (szerk.): Tudományfilozófia. Budapest: Osiris & Láthatatlan Kollégium, 7–32.

Laki János (2006): A tudomány természete. Thomas Kuhn és a tudományfilozófia történeti fordulata. Budapest: Gondolat.

Lakoff, George (1972): Linguistics and natural logic. In: Davidson, Donald & Harman, Gilbert (eds.): Semantics and natural language. Dordrecht: Reidel, 545–665.

Lakoff, George (1973): Deep language [letter to the editor]. New York Review of Books, February 8, 33.

Lakoff, George (1987): Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark (1980): Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Lakoff, Robin (1969): Review of Herbert H. Brekle (ed.) ‘Grammaire générale et raisonnée’. Language 45, 343–364.

Lakoff, Robin (1989): The way we were; or; the real truth about generative semantics: A memoir. Journal of Pragmatics 13, 939–988.

Lancelot, Claude & Arnauld, Antoine (1966) [1676]: Grammaire générale et raisonnée, ou La grammaire du Port-Royal. Ed. by Herbert Brekle. 2 vols. Tome I, nouvelle impression en facsimile de la troisieme edition de 1676. Tome II, variantes et annotations. Stuttgart & Bad Cannstatt: Friedrich Fromann Verlag.

Lancelot, Claude & Arnauld, Antoine (1975): General and rational grammar: The Port-Royal grammar. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Langacker, Ronald W. (1987–1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vols. 1–2. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Langendoen, D. Terence (1995): Review of ‘The linguistics wars’ by Randy Allen Harris. Language 71, 583–588.

Lappin, Shalom & Levine, Robert D. & Johnson, David D. (2000a): The structure of unscientific revolutions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18, 665–671.

Lappin, Shalom & Levine, Robert D. & Johnson, David D. (2000b): The revolution confused: A response to our critics. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18, 873–890.

Lappin, Shalom & Levine, Robert D. & Johnson, David D. (2001): The revolution maximally confused. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19, 901–919.

Lasnik, Howard (2000) Syntactic structures revisited: Contemporary lectures on classic transformational theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Latour, Bruno & Woolgar, Steve (1986): Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Laudan, Larry (1977): Progress and Its Problems. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Lees, Robert (1957): Review of ‘Syntactic structures’. Language 33, 375–40.

Lenerz, Jürgen & Lohnstein, Horst (2005): Nurvso – Strukturaspekte der Vergleichskonstruktion. In: d’Avis, Franz-Josef (Hrsg.): Deutsche Syntax: Empirie und Theorie. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, 82–103.

Levine, Robert D. (2002): Review of ‘Rhyme and reason’ by Juan Uriagereka. Language 78, 325–330.

Levine, Robert D. & Postal, Paul M. (2004): A corrupted linguistics. In: Collier, Peter & Horovitz, David (eds.): The anti-Chomsky reader. San Francisco: Encounter Books, 203–231.

Lewontyn, Richard (2000): The triple helix. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Lehmann, Christian (2004): Data in linguistics. The Linguistic Review 21, 175–210.

Liebert, Wolf-Andreas (1996): Hypertextdesign in der kognitiven Lexikographie. In: Wiegand, Herbert-Ernst (Hrsg.): Wörterbücher in der Diskussion II. Tübingen: Niemeyer 103-139.

Lightbody, Brian & Berman, Michael (2010): The metaphoric fallacy to deductive inference. Informal Logic 30, 185–193.

Lightfoot D. (2002): Introduction. In: Noam Chomsky: Syntactic structures, second edition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, v–xviii.

Lohse, Simon & Reydon, Thomas (Hrsg.) (2017): Grundriss Wissenschaftsphilosophie. Philosophien der Einzelwissenschaften. Hamburg: Meiner.

Lohnstein, Horst (2014): Artenvielfalt in freier Wildbahn – Generative Grammatik. In: Hagemann, Jörg & Staffeldt, Sven (Hrsg.): Syntaxtheorien. Analysen im Vergleich. Tübingen: Stauffenburg, 165–186.

López de Sa, Dan (2011): The many relativisms: Context, index, and beyond. In: Hales, Steven (ed.): A companion to relativism. Oxford: Blackwell, 102–17.

Losee, John (2004): Theories of scientific progress: An introduction. London: Routledge.

Losee, John (2010) [1972]: A historical introduction to the philosophy of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Losee, John (2019): The golden age of the philosophy of science 1945 to 2000. London: Bloomsbury.

Ludlow, Peter (2011): The philosophy of generative linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Łukasiewicz, Jan (1970) [1912]: Creative elements in science. In: Łukasiewicz, Jan: Selected works. Amsterdam: North Holland, 12–44.

Lynch, Michael P. (2001): Truth in context. An essay on pluralism and objectivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Lynch, Michale P. (ed.)(2001): The nature of truth. Classic and contemporary perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Lyons, John (1970): Chomsky. London: Fontana.

MacCorquodale, Kenneth (1970): On Chomsky’s review of Skinner’s ‘Verbal behavior.’ Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 13, 83–99.

MacFarquhar, Larissa (2003): The devil’s accountant. Noam Chomsky’s criticism of America’s role in the world has increased his isolation – and his audience. The New Yorker (March 31). https:// www.newyorker.com/magazine/2003/03/31/the-devils-accoun-tant (letöltve: 2022.10.17.).

Machamer, Peter & Di Poppa, Francesca (2001): Rational reconstruction revisited. Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, secunda epoca, 16, 461–480.

MacIntyre, Alasdair (2010): Relativism, power and philosophy. In: Krausz, Michael (ed.): Relativism. A contemporary anthology. New York: Columbia University Press, 409–430.

Mailer, Mark (2013): The best essay ever: The fallacy of wishful thinking. Review of Contemporary Philosophy 12, 30–42.

Manin, Yu. M. (1998): Truth, rigour and common sense. In: Dales, H. G. & Olivery. G. (eds.): Truth in mathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 147–160.

Mantzavinos, Chrysostomos (2024): The constitution of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Marcolli, Mathilde & Chomsky, Noam & Berwick, Robert C. (2023): Mathematical structure of Merge. Kézirat. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.18278 (letöltve: 2024.12.12.).

Marcolli, Mathilde & Chomsky, Noam & Berwick, Robert C. (2025): Mathematical structure of Merge. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Margolis, Joseph (2010): The truth about relativism. In: Krausz, Michael (ed.): Relativism. A contemporary anthology. New York: Columbia University Press, 100–123.

Martins, Pedro Tiago & Boeckx, Cedric (2019): Language evolution and complexity considerations: The no half-merge fallacy. PLoS biology 17(11). https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000389&type=printable (letöltve: 2024.09.01.).

Martins, Pedro Tiago & Boeckx, (2020). Clarifications on the no half-Merge fallacy. Lingbuzz. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/005432 (letöltve 2024.09.01.).

Márton Miklós (2022): Egy megengedő fizikalizmus. Noam Chomsky metodológiai fizikalizmusa. Magyar Filozófiai Szemle 66, 11–40.

Makov, Ilia & Kharitonova, Ksenia & Grigorenki, Elene L. (2023): Language: Its origin and ongoing evolution. Journal of Intelligence 11: 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence1104006 (letöltve: 2024.06.26.).

Matthews, Peter H. (1993): Grammatical theory in the United States from Bloomfield to Chomsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Matthews, Peter H. (2001): A short history of structural lingustics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

May, Robert C. (1985): Logical form. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Mayr, Ernst (2004): What makes biology unique? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McCawley, James D. (1981): Everything that linguists have always wanted to know about logic but were ashamed to ask. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

McGilvray, James (2009): Introduction to the third edition. In: Chomsky, Noam (2009) [1966]: Cartesian linguistics. New York: Harper & Row, 1–52.

McGrath, Alister (2019): The territories of human reason. Science and Theology in an age of multiple rationalities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Meheus, Joke (2002): Preface. In: Meheus, Joke (ed.) (2002): Inconsistency in science. Dordrecht: Kluwer, vii–ix.

Meheus, Joke (ed.) (2002): Inconsistency in science. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Meibauer, Jörg (Hrsg.) (1987): Satzmodus zwischen Grammatik und Pragmatik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Meiland, Jack W. (1977): Concepts of relative truth. The Monist 60, 568–582.

Meiland, Jack W. (1980): On the paradox of cognitive relativism. Metaphilosophy 11, 115–126.

Mercan, Gözde (2020): Review of Kertész, András & Moravcsik, Edith & Rákosi, Csilla (eds.): ‘Current approaches to syntax: A comparative handbook’. LINGUIST List 31.903. https://linguistlist.org/issues/31/31-903/ (letöltve: 2020.04.25.).

Michael, Jack (1992): Foreword. In: Skinner, B. F. (2014) [1957]: Verbal behavior, 5–10. https://www.bfskinner.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/2014_05_P_003.pdf (letöltve: 2023.10.02.).

Miel, Jan (1969): Pascal, Port-Royal, and Cartesian linguistics. Journal of the History of Ideas 30, 261–271.

Mill, John Stuart (1886): A system of logic, rationacive and inductive. London: John Parker. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/26495/26495-pdf.pdf (letöltve: 2025.12.01).

Miller, David Marshall (2012): The history and philosophy of science history. In: Mauskopf, Seymour & Schmaltz, Tad (eds.) (2012): Integrating history and philosophy of science. Problems and prospects. Dordrecht: Springer, 29–48.

Moltmann, Friederike (2022): Natural language ontology. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/natural-language-ontology/ (letöltve: 2024.11.02.).

Moravcsik, Edith (2006): An introduction to syntactic theory. London & New York: Continuum.

Moravcsik, Edith: (2010): Conflict resolution in syntactic theory. Studies in Language 34, 636–669.

Moravcsik, Edith (2019): Introduction. In: Kertész, András & Moravcsik, Edith & Rákosi, Csilla (eds.) (2019): Current approaches to syntax: A comparative handbook. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter Mouton, 1–20.

Morgan, Mary S. (2022): Narrative: A general-purpose technology for science. In: Morgan, Mary S. & Hajek, Kim M. & Berry, Dominic J. (eds.) (2022): Narrative science: Reasoning, representing and knowing since 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–30.

Morgan, Mary S. & Hajek, Kim M. & Berry, Dominic J. (eds.) (2022): Narrative science: Reasoning, representing and knowing since 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Moulines, C. Ulises (2008): Die Entwicklung der modernen Wissenschaftstheorie (1890–2000). Hamburg: Lit.

Müller, Ralph-Axel (1991): Der (un)teilbare Geist. Berlin: de Guyter.

Müller, Stefan (2014): Artenvielfalt und Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. In: Hagemann, Jörg & Staffeldt, Sven (eds.): Syntaxtheorien. Analysen im Vergleich. Tübingen: Stauffenburg, 184–234.

Müller, Stefan (2016): Grammatical theory. From transformational grammar to constraint-based approaches. Volumes 1–2. Berlin: Language Science Press.

Müller, Stefan (2025): Large language models: The best linguistic theory, a wrong linguistic theory, or no theory at all? Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 44, 1–15.

Mulligan, Kevin & Correira, Fabrice (2020): Facts. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/facts/ (letöltve: 2024.09.12.).

Mumford, Stephen & Anjum, Rani Lill (2013): Causation. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Murray, Stephen O. (1989): Recent studies of American lingustics. Historiographia Linguistica 16, 149–171.

Murray, Stephen O. (1994): Theory groups and the study of language in North America: A social history. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.

Nagel, Ernest (1935): The logic of reduction in the sciences. Erkenntnis 5, 46–52.

Nagel, Ernest (1961): The structure of science. Problems in the logic of explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

Nagy C. Katalin (2015): Adatok és érvelés a történeti pragmatikában. Budapest: Loisir.

Nagy C., Katalin (2019): Data and argumentation in historical pragmatics. Grammaticalization of a Catalan motion verb construction. Sheffield: Equinox.

Nefdt, Ryan (2018): Languages and other abstract structures. In: Behme, Christina & Nef, Martin (eds.) (2018): Essays on linguistic realism. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins, 139–184.

Nefdt, Ryan M. (2019): The philosophy of linguistics: Scientific underpinnings and methodological disputes. Philosophy Compass 14. https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/phc3.12636 (letöltve: 2025.12.13.).

Nefdt, Ryan M. (2023): Language, science, and structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nefdt, Ryan M. (2024): The philosophy of theoretical linguistics. A contemporary outlook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nefdt, Ryan M. (2025): The philosophy of linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nevin, Bruce (2010): Noam and Zellig. In: Kibbee, Douglas A. (ed.) (2010): Chomskyan (r)evolutions. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins, 103–168.

Németh T., Enikő (2019): Implicit subject and direct object arguments in Hungarian language use. Grammar and pragmatics interacting. Sheffield: Equinox.

Németh, Zsuzsanna (2021): A preference hierarchy model of same-turn repair operations in talk-in-interaction. Sheffield: Equinox.

Newmeyer, Frederick J. (1980): Linguistic theory in America. The first quarter century of transformational generative grammar. New York: Academic Press.

Newmeyer, Frederick J. (1986a) [1980]: Linguistic theory in America: The first quarter century of transformational generative grammar. 2nd, revised edition. New York: Academic Press.

Newmeyer, Frederick J. (1986b): Has there been a ‘Chomskyan revolution’ in linguistics? Language 62, 1–18.

Newmeyer, Frederick J. (1986c): The politics of linguistics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Newmeyer, Frederick J. (2003): Review article: Chomsky, ‘On nature and language’; Anderson & Lightfoot, ‘The language organ’; Bichakjian, ‘Language in a Darwinian perspective’. Language 79, 583–599.

Newmeyer, Frederick J. (2004): On split-CPs, uninterpretable features, and the ‘perfectness’ of language. In: Maienborn, Claudia & Frey, Werner & Shaer, Benjamin (eds.): Proceedings of the Dislocated Elements Workshop, ZAS Berlin, November 2003. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 35, 399–421.

Newmeyer, Frederick J. (2022): American linguistics in transition. From post-Bloomfieldian structuralism to generative grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nickles, Thomas (2002): From Copernicus to Ptolemy. Inconsistency and method. In: Meheus, Joke (ed.) (2002): Inconsistency in science. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1–33.

Nickles, Thomas (2013): The problem of demarcation. History and future. In: Pigliucci, Massimo & Boundry, Maarten (eds.): Philosophy of pseudoscience. Chicago & london: University of Chicago Press.

Niiniluoto, Ilkka (2019): Scientific progress. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-progress/ (letöltve: 2024.10.12.).

Nola, Robert & Sankey, Howard (2006): Theories of scientific method. Stocksfield: Acumen Publishing.

Noveck, Ira (2018): Experimental pragmatics. The making of a cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oesterreicher, Wulf (1979): Sprachtheorie und Theorie der Sprachwissenschaft. Heidelberg: Winter.

Oller, D. Kimbrough (2008): Noam Chomsky’s role in biological theory: A mixed legacy. Biological Theory 3(4) 2008, 344–350,

Oppenheim, Paul & Putnam, Hilary (1958): The unity of science as a working hypothesis. In: Feigl, Herbert & Scriven, Michael & Maxwell, Grover (eds.): Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, vol. 2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 3–36.

Paksi, Daniel (2016): Relativism or absolutism? David Bloor and the snares of an unfortunate dichotomy. Common Knowledge 22, 473–487.

Palmer, David C. (2003): Cognition. In: Lattal, Kennon Andy & Chase, Philip N. (eds.): Behavior theory and philosophy. New York: Kluwer, 167–185.

Palmer, David C. (2006): On Chomsky’s appraisal of Skinner’s ‘Verbal Behavior’: A half century of misunderstanding. Behavior Analyst 19, 253–267.

Palmer, David C. (2008): On Skinner’s definition of verbal behavior. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy 8, 295–307.

Penke, Martina & Rosenbach, Anette (eds.) (2007): What counts as evidence in linguistics? Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.

Percival, W. Keith (1972): On the non-existence of Cartesian linguistics. In: Buttler, Ronald Joseph (ed.): Cartesian studies. Oxford: Blackwell, 401–426.

Percival, W. Keith (1976): The applicability of Kuhn’s paradigms to the history of linguistics. Language 52, 285–294.

Percival, W. Keith (1977): Review of E. F. K. Koerner: Ferdinand de Saussure: Origin and development of his linguistic thought in Western studies of language. Language 53, 383–405.

Percival, Keith W. (1981): The Saussurean paradigm: Fact or fantasy? Semiotica 36, 33–49.

Perry, Thomas A. (ed.) (1980): Evidence and Argumentation in Linguistics. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.

Piantadosi, Steven T. (2024). Modern language models refute Chomsky’s approach to language. Lingbuzz, 7180.

Piatelli-Palmarini, Massimo (1998): Foreword. In: Uriagereka, Juan: Rhyme and reason. An introduction to minimalist syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, xxi–xxxvi.

Piatelli-Palmarini, Massimo (2010): What is language, that it may have evolved, and what is evolution, that it may apply to language. In: Larson, Richard K. & Déprez, Viviane & Yamakido, Hiroko (eds.): The evolution of human language. Biolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,148–162.

Pietsch, Wolfgang (2016): Two modes of reasoning with case studies. In: Sauer, Tilman & Scholl, Raphael (eds.): The philosophy of historical case studies. Cham: Springer, 49–68.

Pigden, Charles R. (2011): Is-ought survey (recent work on is and ought). https://www.academia.edu/5649505/Is_Ought_Survey_Recent_Work_on_Is_and_Ought_?email_work_card=view-paper (letöltve: 2024.12.08.).

Pitt, Joseph C. (2001): The dilemma of case studies: Toward a Heraclitian philosophy of science. Perspectives on Science 9, 373–382.

Pinker, Steven (2021): Rationality. What it is, why it seems scarce, why it matters. Penguin Books.

Pinker, Steven & Jackendoff, Ray (2005): The faculty of language: what’s special about it? Cognition 95, 201–236.

Platón (1984): Theaitétosz. Fordította Kerényi Grácia. In: Platón összes művei. Második kötet. Budapest: Európa, 895–1070.

Platón (2001): Theaitétosz. Fordította, a jegyzeteket és a kommentárt írta: Bárány István. Budapest: Atlantisz.

Pléh Csaba (1996): A modern kognitivizmus mozgalma és változásai. In: Pléh Csaba (szerk.): Kognitív tudomány. Budapest: Osiris – Láthatatlan kollégium, 9–34.

Pléh Csaba (2009): Chomsky és a pszichológia. Magyar Tudomány 2009/9, 1075–1081.

Pléh Csaba (2014a): A pszicholingvisztika története. In: Pléh Csaba & Lukács Ágnes (szerk): Pszicholingvisztika 1. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 3–116.

Pléh Csaba (2014b): A nyelv evolúciója. In: In: Pléh Csaba & Lukács Ágnes (szerk): Pszicholingvisztika 1. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1033–1088.

Pléh Csaba (2021): A nyelv biológiai beágyazottságának genetikai háttere. In: Pléh Csaba (szerk.): Pszichológia. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. https://mersz.hu/dokumentum/m880pk__271/ (letöltve 2025.03.12.).

Pléh, Csaba & Roszkowsky, Magdalena (2020): Review of Kertész, András & Moravcsik, Edith & Rákosi, Csilla (eds.) ‘Current approaches to syntax: A comparative handbook’. Acta Linguistica Academica 67, 383–397.

Pollock, John L. (2001): Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification. Artificial Intelligence 133, 233–282.

Pólya György (1971): A problémamegoldás iskolája. I–II kötet. Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó.

Pólya György (1977): A gondolkodás iskolája. Budapest: Gondolat.

Pólya György (1988): Indukció és analógia. Budapest: Gondolat.

Pólya György (1989): A plauzibilis következtetés. Budapest: Gondolat.

Poole, Steven (2024): The truth about English grammar by Geoffrey K. Pullum – the plants rule and other pipe dreams. A breezy guide to grammar sides with the ordinary Joe against the nitpickers. The Guardian. 28th June 2024. https://www.theguardian.com/books/article/2024/jun/28/the-truth-about-english-grammar-by-geoffrey-k-pullum-review-the-pants-rule-and-other-pipe-dreams (letöltve: 2024.11.14.).

Popper, Karl R. (1962): Conjectures and refutations. New York & London: Basic Books.

Popper, Karl. R. (1979): The growth of scientific knowledge. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.

Popper, Karl R. (1997) [1934]: A tudományos kutatás logikája. Budapest: Európa.

Popper, Karl R. (2001)[1962]: A nyitott társadalom és ellenségei. Budapest: Balassi.

Postal, Paul M. (1972): The best theory. In: Peters, P. Stanley (ed.): Goals of linguistic theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 131–170.

Postal, Paul M. (2004): Skeptical linguistic essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Postal, Paul M. (2009): The incoherence of Chomsky’s ‘biolinguistic’ ontology. Biolinguistics 3, 103–123.

Postal, Paul M. (2012): Chomsky’s foundational admission. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001569 (letöltve: 2024.16.17).

Postal, Paul M. & Pullum, Geoffrey K. (1997): Murphy’s review of Barsky. LINGUIST List 8.755. https://linguistlist.org/issu- es/8/8-755/ (letöltve: 2020.01.21.).

Priest, Graham (1998): What is so bad about contradictions? The Journal of Philosophy 95, 410–426.

Priest, Graham (2001): Paraconsistent belief revision. Theoria 67, 214–228.

Priest, Graham (2002a): Inconsistency and the empirical sciences. In: Meheus, Joke (ed.) (2002): Inconsistency in science. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 119–128.

Priest, Graham (2002b): Paraconsistent logic. In: Gabbay, Dov M. & Guenthner, Franz (eds.): Handbook of philosophical logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 287–393.

Priest, Graham & Beall, J. C. & Armour-Garb, Bradley (eds.) (2004): The law of non-contradiction. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Priest, Graham & Tanaka, Koji & Zah Weber (2018): Paraconsistent logic. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-paraconsistent/ (letöltve: 2020.02.11.).

Prinz, Michael & Wiese, Richard (1991): Die Affrikaten des Deutschen und ihre Verschriftung. Linguistische Berichte 133, 165–189.

Pullum, Geoffrey K. (1996): Nostalgic views from Building 20. Journal of Linguistics 32, 137–147.

Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2009): Creation myths of generative grammar, and the mathematics underlying ‘Syntactic structures’. Paper presented at the Mathematics of Language conference at UCLA in August 2007. http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~gpullum/postMoLpaper.pdf (letöltve 2025.03.03.).

Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2011): On the mathematical foundations of ‘Syntactic structures’. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 20, 277–296.

Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2013): The central question of comparative syntactic metatheory. Mind & Language 28, 492–521.

Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2024): The truth about English grammar. London: Polity Press.

Putnam, Hilary (1981): Reason, truth and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Quine, Willard van Orman (1951): Two dogmas of empiricism. The Philosophical Review 60, 20–43.

Quine, Willard van Orman (1969): Epistemology naturalized. In: Quine, Willard van Orman: Ontological relativity and other essays. New York: de Gruyter, 69–90.

Quine, Willard van Orman (1970): On the reasons for indeterminacy of translation. Journal of Philosophy 67, 178–183.

Quine, Willard van Orman (1975): On empirically equivalent systems of the world. Erkenntnis 9, 313–328.

Ragin, Charles C. (2013): Analytic induction for social research. Oakland: University of California Press.

Rákosi, Csilla (2026): Experimental complexes in conceptual metaphor research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (sajtó alatt).

Rákosi, György (2020): Review of Kertész, András & Moravcsik, Edith & Rákosi, Csilla (eds.) ‘Current approaches to syntax: A comparative handbook’. Acta Linguistica Academica 67, 388–393.

Reichenbach, Hans (1938): Experience and prediction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Rényi Alfréd (1973a): Dialógus a matematikáról. In: Rényi Alfréd: Ars Mathematica. Budapest: Magvető, 17–72.

Rényi Alfréd (1973b): A természet könyvének nyelve. In: Rényi Alfréd: Ars Mathematica. Budapest: Magvető, 106–159.

Rescher, Nicholas (1973): The coherence theory of truth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Rescher, Nicholas (1976): Plausible reasoning. Assen & Amsterdam: Van Gorcum.

Rescher, Nicholas (1988): Rationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Rescher, Nicholas (1993): Pluralism. Against the demand for consensus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rescher, Nicholas (2022): Philosophical fallacies. Ways of erring in philosophical exposition. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Rescher, Nicolas (2024): Reductio ad absurdum. In: Fieser, James & Dowden, Bradley (eds.): Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/reductio/ (letöltve: 2025 03.25.)

Rescher, Nicholas & Brandom, Robert (1980): The logic of inconsistency. Oxford: Blackwell.

Ressler, Mark (2008): Relativism and tolerance revisited. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Relativism-and-Tolerance-Revisited-Ressler/bcd63c0c8f85e74cb56bb50c4763c5ce15792ec2?p2df (letöltve: 2020.03.13.).

Ressler, Mark (2013): The logic of relativism. Hely nélkül: Increasingly Sceptical Publications.

Rey, Georges (2020): Representation of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reydon, Thomas (2017): Philosophie der Biologie. In: Lohse, Simon & Reydon, Thomas (Hrsg.): Grundriss Wissenschaftsphilosophie. Die Philosophie der Einzelwissenschaften. Hamburg: Meiner, 253–286.

Reydon, Thomas (2025): The scope of evolutionary thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Riemer, Nick (2009): Grammaticality as evidence and as prediction in a Galilean linguistics. Language Sciences 31, 612–633.

Robinson, W. S. (1951): The logical structure of analytic induction. American Sociological Review 16, 812–818.

Rodrigues, Cassiano Terra (2024): Informal logic. In: Martin, Benjamin: Introduction to Philosophy: Logic. https://press.rebus.community/intro-to-phil-logic/chapter/chapter-4-informal-fallacies/ (letöltve: 2124.12.29).

Rosenberg, Alexander (1996): Darwinian reductions, or, how to stop worrying and love molecular biology. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.

Rosenberg, Jay (1980): One world and our knowledge of it. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Rowbottom, Darrell P. (2023): Scientific progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ruphy, Stéphanie (2016): Scientific pluralism reconsidered. A new approach to the (dis)unity of science. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.

Ryan, Marie-Laure (2017): Narrative. In: Szeman, Imre & Blacker, Sarah & Sully, Justin (eds.): A companion to critical and cultural theory. London: Wiley Blackwell, 517–530.

Sadock, Jerrold M. (1990): Review of ‘Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function of changing’ by Mark Baker. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8, 129–141.

Salmon, Vivian (1969): Review of N. Chomsky, ‘Cartesian Linguistics’. Journal of Linguistics 5, 165–167.

Sampson, Geoffrey R. (1975): The form of language. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.

Sampson, Geoffrey R. (2007): Reply. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 3, 111–129.

Sampson, Geoffrey R. & Babarczy, Anna (2014): Grammar without grammaticality. Growth and limits of grammatical precision. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter.

Santana, Carlos (2016): What is language? Ergo 3, 501–523.

Schaffer, Jonathan (2016): The metaphysics of causation. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/causation-metaphysics/ (letöltve: 2022.03.22.).

Schikore, Jutta (2011): More thoughts on HPS: Another 20 years later. Perspectives on Science 19, 453–481.

Schindler, Samuel & Drożdżowicz, Anna & Brøcker, Karen (eds.) (2020): Linguistic intuitions: Evidence and method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schantz, Richard & Seidel, Markus (eds.) (2013): The problem of relativism in the sociology of (scientific) knowledge. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Schlesewsky, Matthias (2009): Linguistische Daten aus experimentellen Umgebungen: Eine multiexperimentelle und multimodale Perspektive. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 28, 169–178.

Schlinger, Henry D. (2008): The long good-bye: Why B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior is alive and well on the 50th anniversary of its publication. The Psychological Record 58, 329–337.

Schoneberger, Ted (2000a): The Chomsky-Place correspondence 1993–1994. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior 17, 7–38.

Schoneberger, Ted (2000b): A departure from cognitivism: Implications of Chomsky’s second revolution in linguistics. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior 17, 57–73.

Scholl, Raphael & Räz, Tim (2016): Towards a methodology for integrated history and philosophy of science. In: Sauer, Tilman & Scholl, Raphael (eds.): The philosophy of historical case studies. Cham: Springer, 69–94.

Scholz, Barbara & Pelletier, Francis Jeffry & Pullum, Geoffrey K. & Nefdt, Ryan (2022): Philosophy of linguistics. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/linguistics/ (letöltve: 2024.04.16.).

Schütze, Carson T. (1996): The empirical base of linguistics. Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.

Schumacher, Helmut & Kubczak, Jacqueline & Schmidt, Renate & de Ruiter, Vera (2004): Valenzwörterbuch deutscher Verben. Tübingen: Narr.

Schurz, Gerhard (1997): The is-ought problem. A study in philosophical logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Schurz, Gerhard (2005): Rationale Rekonstruktion: die Methode der Wissenschaftstheorie. In: Gesang, Bernhard (Hrsg.): Deskriptive oder normative Wissenschaftstheorie? Frankfurt am Main: Ontos, 123–144.

Schurz, Gerhard (2008): Patterns of abduction. Synthese 164, 201–234.

Schurz, Gerhard (2014): Philosophy of science: A unified approach. London: Routledge

Searle, John R. (1964): How to derive ‘ought’ from ‘is’. The Philosophical Review 73, 43–58.

Searle, John R. (1972): Chomsky’s revolution in linguistics. The New York Review of Books 19, 16–24.

Searle, John R. (2002): John Searle replies. The New York Review of Books. July 18, 2002. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2002/07/18/chomskys-revolution-an-exchange/ (letöltve: 2024.16.02.)

Sellars, Wilfrid (1963): Science, perception and reality. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.

Seuren, Pieter A. M. (1998): Western linguistics: An historical introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

Seuren, Pieter A. M. (2004): Chomsky’s minimalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Seuren, Pieter A. M. (2017): Saussure and Sechehaye. Myth and genious. Leiden & Boston: Brill.

Siegel, Harvey (2004): Relativism. In: Niiniluoto, Ilkka & Sintonen, Matti & Wolenski, Jan (eds.): Handbook of epistemology. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 747–780.

Simone, Raffaele (2004): The object, the method, and the ghosts. Remarks on a ‘terra incognita’. The Linguistic Review 21, 235–256.

Skinner, B. F. (1938): The behavior of organisms. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Skinner, B. F. (1953): Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.

Skinner, B. F. (1957): Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Skinner, B. F. (2014) [1957]: Verbal behavior. https://www.bfskinner.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/2014_05_P_003.pdf (letöltve: 2023.10.02.).

Skinner, B. F. (1979): The shaping of a behaviorist. New York: Knopf.

Smith, Neil (1999). Chomsky: Ideas and ideals. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Smith, John Maynard & Szathmáry Eörs (2012): A földi élet regénye. Az élet születésétől a nyelv kialakulásáig. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.

Sober, Elliott (2015): Ockham’s razors: A user’s manual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sokal, Alan & Bricmont, Jean (2000) [1997]: Intellektuális imposztorok. Posztmodern értelmiségiek visszaélése a tudománnyal. Budapest: Typotex.

Sprouse, Jon & Schütze, Carson T. (2020): Grammar and the use of data. In: Aarts, Bas & Bowie, Jill & Popova, Gergana (eds.): The Oxford handbook of English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 40–58.

Staffeldt, Sven & Zimmermann, Claudia & Zimmermann, Ralf (2014): Würzburger syntaktische Analysen. In: Hagemann, Jörg & Staffeldt, Sven (eds.): Syntaxtheorien. Analysen im Vergleich. Tübingen: Stauffenburg, 63–94.

Stainton, Robert (2014): Philosophy of linguistics. Oxford handbooks online. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/42642/chapter/358143239 (letöltve: 2025.01.12).

Stalnaker, Robert C. (1984): Inquiry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Stechow, Arnim von & Sternefeld, Wolfgang (1988): Bausteine syntaktischen Wissens: Ein Lehrbuch der generativen Grammatik. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Gries, Stephan Th. (eds.) (2007): Grammar without grammaticality. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter [special issue of Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 3].

Stegmüller, Wolfgang (1969–1973): Probleme und Resultete der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Wissenschaftstheorie. Berlin: Springer.

Stegmüller, Wolfgang (1973a): Theorie und Erfahrung. Probleme und Resultete der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Wissenschaftstheorie. Band I/1. Berlin: Springer.

Stegmüller, Wolfgang (1973b): Theorienstrukturen und Theoriendynamik. Probleme und Resultete der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Wissenschaftstheorie. Band II/1. Berlin: Springer.

Stegmüller, Wolfgang (1973c): Personelle und statistische Wahrscheinlichkeit. Probleme und Resultete der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Wissenschaftstheorie. Band IV/2. Berlin: Springer.

Stegmüller, Wolfgang (1979): The structuralist view of theories. Berlin: Springer.

Stegmüller, Wolfgang (1980): Neue Wege der Wissenschaftsphilosophie. Berlin: Springer.

Stegmüller, Wolfgang (1983): Erklärung, Begründung, Kausalität. Berlin: Springer.

Sternefeld, Wolgfgang (2006): Syntax. Eine morphologisch motivierte generative Beschreibung des Deutschen. 2 Bände. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.

Sternefeld, Wolfgang (ed.) (2007): Data in generative grammar. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter [special issue of Theoretical Linguistics 33(3)].

Sternefeld, Wolfgang & Richter, Frank (2012): Wo stehen wir in der Grammatiktheorie? Bemerkungen anlässlich eines Buchs von Stefan Müller. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 31, 263–290.

Stewart, Thomas W. (2016): Contemporary morphological theories. A user’s guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Stokhof, Martin & van Lambalgen, Michiel (2011): Abstractions and idealisations: The construction of modern linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 37, 1–26.

Stoljar, Daniel (2021): Physicalism. In: : Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/physicalism/ (letöltve: 2022.11.3.).

Sundberg, Mark L. (1991): 301 Research topics from Skinner’s book ‘Verbal behavior’. Analysis of Verbal Behavior 9, 81–96.

Suppe, Frederick (1977): The search for philosophic understanding of scientific theories. In: Suppe, Frederick (ed.): The structure of scientific theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 3–232.

Surányi Balázs (2009): Problémaeltolódások a generatív nyelvészetben: mi minimális a minimalizmusban? Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 106, 258–265.

Tahko, Tuomas E. (2021): Unity of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tanaka, Koji & Berto, Francesca & Mares, Edwin & Paoli, Francesco (eds.) (2013): Paraconsistency: Logic and applications. Dordrecht: Springer.

Teller, Paul (2004): What is a stance? Philosophical Studies 121, 159–170.

ten Hacken, Pius (2007): Chomskyan linguistics and its competitors. London: Equinox.

Terzian, Giulia & Corbalán, Maria Ines (2021): Simplicity of what? A case study from generative linguistics. Synthese 198, 9427–9452

Thagard, Paul (2012): The cognitive science of science: Explanation, discovery, and conceptual change. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.

Thilo, Ulrich M. (1989): Rezeption und Wirkung des Cours de linguistique generale. Überlegungen zu Geschichte und Historiographie der Sprachwissenschaft. Tübingen: Narr.

Tomalin, Marcus (2006): Linguistics and the formal sciences: The origins of generative grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tomalin, Marcus (2011): Syntactic Structures and recursive devices: A legacy of imprecision. Journal for Logic, Language and Information 20:297–315.

Tsiapera, Maria (1990): Organic metaphor in early 19th century linguistics. In: Niederehe, Hans-Josef & Koerner, E. F. Konrad (eds.): History and historiography of linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins, 577–588.

Tuboly Ádám Tamás (2018): Egység és tolerancia. A logikai empirizmus tudományos világfelfogása. Budapest: MTA Bölcsészettudományi Kutatóközpont Filozófiai Intézet.

Tucker, Aviezer (ed.) (2011): A companion to the philosophy of history and historiography. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Tuomela, Raimo (1988): The myth of the given and realism. Erkenntnis 29, 181–200.

Turner, Raymond (2021): The philosophy of computer science. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/computer-science/ (letöltve: 2019.04.15.).

Young, James O. (2018): The coherence theory of truth. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-coherence/ (letöltve: 2019.04.15.).

van der Hulst, Harry (2024): A mind for language. An introduction to the innateness debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

van Eeemeren, Frans & Grootendorst, Rob (2004): A Systematic theory of argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

van Eemeren, Frans & Garssen, Bart & Meuffels, Bert (2009): Fallacies and judgments of reasonableness. Empirical research concerning the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. Dordrecht: Springer.

van Fraassen, Bas C. (2002): The empirical stance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

van Riel, Raphael & van Gulick, Robert (2025): Scientific reduction. In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.): The Stanford Enyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reduction/ (letöltve 12.01.2026).

Vecsey, Zoltán (2019): Fiction and representation. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter.

Vecsey, Zoltán (2024): The autonomy of reference. On the relational structure of nominals. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

Virués-Ortega, Javier (2006): The case against B. F. Skinner 45 years later: An encounter with N. Chomsky. The Behavior Analyst 29, 243–251.

Vollmer, Timothy R. & Joslyn, P. Raymond (2018): Behaviorism. In: Ritzer, George & and Rojek, Chris (eds.): The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology. London: Blackwell. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324816963_Behaviorism (letöltve: 2024.10.12.).

Walker, Ralph C. (1989): The coherence theory of truth. London: Routledge.

Waller, Bruce N. (2001): Classifying and analyzing analogies. Informal Logic 21, 199–218.

Walton, Douglas (1995): A pragmatic theory of fallacy. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.

Walton, Douglas (1996): Fallacies arising from ambiguity. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Walton, Douglas (1998): Ad hominem arguments. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.

Walton, Douglas (2001): Searching for the roots of the circumstantial ad hominem. Argumentation 15, 207–221.

Walton, Douglas (2005): Abductive reasoning. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

Walton, Douglas (2008) [1989]: Informal logic. A pragmatic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Walton, Douglas (2010): Why fallacies appear to be better arguments than they are. Informal Logic 30, 159–184.

Walton, Douglas (2013a): Relevance in argumentation. New York: Routledge.

Walton, Douglas (2013b): Methods of argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Walton, Douglas & Reed, Chris & Macagno, Fabrizio (2008): Argumentation schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Walton, Douglas & Macagno, Fabrizio (2018): Interpreting straw man argumentation: The pragmatics of quotation and reporting. Cham: Springer.

Waterlow, Sarah (1977): Protagoras and inconsistency: Theaetetus 171a6–c7. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 59, 19–36.

Wedin, Michael V. (2005): Animadversions on Burnyeat’s Theaetetus: On the logic of the exquisite argument. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39, 171–191.

Weinberg, Steven (1976): The forces of nature. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 29, 13–29.

Weinberg, Steven (1987): Newtonianism, reductionism and the art of congressional testimony. Nature 330, 433–437.

Whitehead, Alfred North (1925): Science and the modern world. London: Macmillan.

Wiener Kreis (1929): Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung. Der Wiener Kreis. https://www.phil.cmu.edu/projects/carnap/editorial/latex_pdf/1929-5.pdf (letöltve: 2025.03.12.).

Wigner, Eugene (1960): The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. In: Wigner, Eugene: Communications in pure and applied mathematics, Vol. 13, No. I. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1–14. https://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~v1ranick/papers/wigner.pdf (letöltve: 2025.04.11).

Williams, Richard N. & Robinson, Daniel N. (eds.) (2015): Scientism. The new orthodoxy. London: Bloomsbury.

Winston, Morton E. (1976): Did a (Kuhnian) scientific revolution occur in linguistics? PSA 1, 25–33.

Wöllstein, Angelika (2014): Topologisches Satzmodell. In: Hagemann, Jörg & Staffeldt, Sven (Hrsg.) (2014): Syntaxtheorien. Analysen im Vergleich. Tübingen: Stauffenburg, 143–164.

Woodward, James F. (2011): Data and phenomena: a restatement and defense. Synthese 182, 165–179.

Woollacott, Martin (1989): Deliver us from evil. Guardian. January 14, 1989.

Wunderlich, Dieter (Hrsg.)(1976): Wissenschaftstheorie der Linguistik. Frankfurt am Main: Atheneum.

Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich (1981): Phonologie: Segmentale Struktur. In: Heidolph, Karl Erich et al. (Hrsg.) (1980): Grundzüge einer deutschen Grammatik. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 898–990.

Zifonun, Gisela (2014): Syntaktische Analyse in der Kategorialgrammatik. In: Hagemann, Jörg & Staffeldt, Sven (eds.): Syntaxtheorien. Analysen im Vergleich. Tübingen: Stauffenburg, 95–124.

Zilio, Diego & Carrara, Kester (eds.) (2021): Contemporary behaviorisms in debate. Cham: Springer.

Zilioli, Ugo (2007): Protagoras and the challenge of relativism. Plato’s subtlest enemy. London: Routledge.

Znaniecki, Florian (1934): The method of sociology. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.

Zoglauer, Thomas (1993): Das Problem der theoretischen Terme. Eine Kritik an der strukturalistischen Wissenschaftstheorie. Braunschweig & Wiesbaden: Vieweg.

Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa (1982): On the relationship of the lexicon to syntax. Ph.D. Diss. MIT, Cambridge, MA.

Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa (1987): Levels of representation in the lexicon and in the syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.

Tartalomjegyzék

Kiadó: Akadémiai Kiadó

Online megjelenés éve: 2026

ISBN: 978 963 664 125 2

Nyelvészet

A könyv egy olyan tudományszemléletet körvonalaz, amely lehetővé teszi a nyelvészet és a tudományelmélet szisztematikus együttműködését. Egyrészt a transzformációs generatív nyelvészet példájából kiindulva rámutat az ellentmondások típusaira, az érvelési hibákra, valamint a tudományos haladás gátját jelentő elemekre a nyelvtudományban. Másrészt olyan, a nyelvészeti problémák megoldását segítő, a nyelvtudomány különböző területeire alkalmazható tudományelméleti stratégiákat javasol, amelyek felismerésére és alkalmazására a tárgytudományos kutatás eszközei nem alkalmasak. Ily módon a tudományelméleti elemzések eredményei beépülhetnek a nyelvészek tárgytudományos kutatási gyakorlatába. A könyv gondolatmenete azt mutatja be, hogy a nyelvészet tudományelméletének célja nem a priori normák előírása és számonkérése a tudományos kutatás gyakorlatán. Célja ugyanaz, mint a tárgytudományos kutatásé: a nyelvtudás, a nyelvhasználat, a nyelvtörténet leírása és magyarázata. Ugyanakkor a tudományelmélet e célt a tárgytudományos kutatásnál magasabb absztrakciós szinten és kevésbé technikai jelleggel, ismeretelméleti, nyelvfilozófiai és tudománytörténeti összefüggések mérlegelésével közelíti meg. A könyv végkövetkeztetései a chomskyánus generatív grammatika monista, abszolutista és intoleráns narratívájával szemben a nyelvtudomány pluralista, relativista és toleráns művelésének heurisztikus termékenysége és progresszivitása mellett szólnak.

Hivatkozás: https://mersz.hu/kertesz-mire-jo-a-nyelvtudomany-elmelete//

BibTeX EndNote Mendeley Zotero