Lukovics Miklós

Az önvezető járművek és a városi társadalom

VII. Felhasznált irodalom

5G-PPP Automotive Working Group (2018): A study 5G V2X Deployment. Elérhető: https://5g-ppp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/5G-PPP-Automotive-WG-White-Paper_Feb. 2018.pdf (Letöltve: 2025. március 10.)

Acharya, S. – Mekker, M. (2022): Public acceptance of connected vehicles: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Transportation Research Part F, Vol. 88., 54–68.

Acheampong, R. A. – Cugurullo, F. – Gueriau, M. – Dusparic, I. (2021): Can autonomous vehicles enable sustainable mobility in future cities? Insights and policy challenges from user preferences over different urban transport options. Cities, Vol. 112., Article 103134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103134

Acheampong, R. A. – Cugurullo, F. (2019): Capturing the behavioural determinants behind the adoption of autonomous vehicles: Conceptual frameworks and measurement models to predict public transport, sharing and ownership trends of self-driving cars. Transp. Res. Part F Tra_c Psychol. Behav, Vol. 62., 349–375.

Addelman, S. (1962): Orthogonal Main-Effect Plans for Asymmetrical Factorial Experiments. Technometrics, 4(1). 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1962.10489985

Alam, M. J. – Habib, M. A. (2018): Investigation of the impacts of shared autonomous vehicle operation in Halifax, Canada, using a dynamic traffic microsimulation model. Procedia Computer Science, 130: 496–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.066.

Alatawneh, A. – Torok, A. (2025): Use-stage emissions of conventional, battery electric, and autonomous vehicles in Europe. Case Studies on Transport Policy, Vol. 20., 101398, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101398.

Alatawneh, A. – Torok, A. (2023): Potential autonomous vehicle ownership growth in Hungary using the Gompertz model. Production Engineering Archives, Vol. 29., No. 2., Sciendo, 2023. 155–161. https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2023.29.18

Alazzawi, S. – Hummel, M. – Kordt, P. – Sickenberger, T. – Wieseotte, C. – Wohak, O. (2018): Simulating the impact of shared, autonomous vehicles on urban mobility. A case study of Milan. In: Wießner, E. – Lücken, L. – Hilbrich, R. – Flötteröd, Y-P. – Erdmann, J. – Bieker-Walz, L. – Behrisch, M. (eds.): SUMO 2018 – Simulating Autonomous and Intermodal Transport Systems. 2, 94–110. https://doi.org/10.29007/2n4h.

Albino, V. – Berardi, U. – Dangelico, R. M. (2015): Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092.

Alfonso, J. – Naranjo, J. E. – Menéndez, J. M. – Alonso, A. (2018): Vehicular Communications. Intell. Veh., 103–139. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-812800-8.00003-5

Alonso-Mora, J. – Samaranayake, S. – Wallar, A. – Frazzoli, E. – Rus, D. (2017): On-demand high-capacity ride-sharing via dynamic trip-vehicle assignment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 114(3), 462–467. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611675114

Ambrus I. (2019): Az autonóm járművek és a büntetőjogi felelősségre vonás akadályai. In: Mezei K. (szerk.): A bűnügyi tudományok és az informatika. PTE ÁJK – MTA TK, Budapest–Pécs, 9–26.

Aoyama, Y. – Leon, L. F. A. (2021): Urban governance and autonomous vehicles. Cities, Vol. 119., 103410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103410.

Arbib, J. – Seba, T. (2017): Rethinking Transportation 2020–2030 - The Disruption of Transportation and the Collapse of the Internal-Combustion Vehicle and Oil Industries. A RethinkX Sector Disruption Report, May 2017.

Arentshorst, M. E. – De Cock Buning, T. – Broerse, J. E. (2016): Exploring responsible neuroimaging innovation: visions from a societal actor perspective. Bulletin of Science, Technology – Society, 36(4), 229–240.

Ashraf, A. R. – Thongpapanl, N. (Tek) – Auh, S. (2014): The Application of the Technology Acceptance Model under Different Cultural Contexts: The Case of Online Shopping Adoption. Journal of International Marketing, 22(3), 68–93. DOI: 10.1509/jim.14.0065

Ásványi K. – Miskolczi M. – Kökény L. – Jászberényi M. (2023): Önvezető járművek hatása a turizmusra hazai szakértők szemével. Turizmus Bulletin, 23(3). 5–14. https://doi.org/10.14267/TURBULL.2023v23n3.1

Atalay, A. S. – Bodur H. O. – Rasolofoarison D. (2012): Shining in the center: Central gaze cascade effect on product choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 848–866.

Atzori, L. – Floris, A. – Girau, R. – Nitti, M. – Pau, G. (2018): Towards the implementation of the Social Internet of Vehicles. Comput. Networks, 147, 132–145. DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2018.10.001

Audi-Ipsos (2019): The pulse of autonomous driving. An international user typology and an emotional landscape of autonomous driving. Communication Trends, Ingolstadt.

Auld, J. – Sokolov, V. – Stephens, T. S. (2017): Analysis of the effects of connected-automated vehicle technologies on travel demand. Transportation Research Record, 2625(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3141/2625-01

Awad, E. – Dsouza, S. – Kim, R. – Schulz, J. – Henrich, J. – Shariff, A. – Bonnefon, J.-F. – Rahwan, I. (2018): The moral machine experiment. Nature, 563, 7729, 59–64.

Babbie, E. (2016): The Practice of Social Research. 14th Edition. Cengage Learning, Amerikai Egyesült Államok.

Baccarella, C. V. – Wagner, T. F. – Scheiner, C. W. – Maier, L. – Voigt, K.-I. (2020): Investigating consumer acceptance of autonomous technologies: the case of self-driving automobiles. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(4), 1210–1323. DOI10.1108/EJIM-09-2019-0245

Baldwin, R. (2014): From Regulation to Behaviour Change: Giving Nudge the Third Degree. Modern Law Review, Vol. 77., No. 6., 831–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12094.

Banyár J. (2019): Az önvezető autók lehetséges hatásai az életmódra és a gazdaságra. Polgári Szemle, 15. évf., 4–6. sz. 132–152. DOI: 10.24307/psz.2019.1210

Barcham, R. (2014): Climate and Energy Impacts of Automated Vehicles. Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley, CA.

Barnes, P. – Turkel, E. – Moreland, L. – Pragg, S. (2017): Autonomous Vehicles in Delaware: Analyzing the Impact and Readiness for the First State. Institute for Public Administration, School of Public Policy and Administration, University of Delaware.

Bateman, I. J. – Day, B. H. – Jones, A. P. – Jude, S. (2009): Reducing gain–loss asymmetry: a virtual reality choice experiment valuing land use change. J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 58(1), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2008.05.003

Baumann, M. F. – Brändle, C. – Coenen, C. – Zimmer-Merkle, S. (2019): Taking responsibility: A responsible research and innovation (RRI) perspective on insurance issues of semi-autonomous driving. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 124, 557–572.

Bayart, C. – Havet, N. – Bonnel, P. – Bouzouina, L. (2020): Young people and the private car: A love-hate relationship. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 80., 102235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102235

Bayer, M. – Frank, N. – Valerius, J. (2010): Becoming an urban planner: A guide to careers in planning and urban design. John Wiley – Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.

Bazilinskyy, P. – Kyriakidis, M. – Dodou, D. – De Winter, J. (2019): When will most cars be able to drive fully automatically? Projections of 18,970 survey respondents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 64, 184–195. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.05.008

Bellet, T. – Banet, A. (2023): UTAUT4-AV: An extension of the UTAUT model to study intention to use automated shuttles and the societal acceptance of different types of automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 99., 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2023.10.007.

Benleulmi, A. Z. – Blecker, T. (2017): Investigating the factors influencing the acceptance of fully autonomous cars. In: Kersten, W. – Blecker, T. – Ringle, C. M. (Ed.): Digitalization in Supply Chain Management and Logistics: Smart and Digital Solutions for an Industry 4.0 Environment. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL). 23, 99–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.15480/882.1449

Benleumi, A. Z. – Blecker, T. (2017): Investigating the factors influencing the acceptance of fully autonomous cars. In: Kersten, W. – Blecker, T. – Ringle, C. M. (eds.): Digitalization in Supply Chain Management and Logistics: Smart and Digital Solutions for an Industry 4.0 Environment Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL). 23. 99–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.15480/882.1449

Bergvall-Kåreborn, B. – Hoist, M. – Ståhlbröst, A. (2009): Concept design with a living lab approach. In: 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences IEEE. 1–10.

Berto, R. – Massaccesi, S. – Pasini, M. (2008): Do eye movements measured across high and low fascination photographs differ? Addressing Kaplan’s fascination hypothesis. J. Environ. Psychol, 28, 185–191.

Bezai, N. E. – Medjdoub, B. – Al-Habaibeh, A. – Chalal, M. L. – Fadli, F. (2021): Future cities and autonomous vehicles: analysis of the barriers to full adoption. Energy and Built Environment, Vol. 2., No. 1., 65–81.

Bimbraw, K. (2015): Autonomous Cars: Past, Present and Future - A Review of the Developments in the Last Century, the Present Scenario and the Expected Future of Autonomous Vehicle Technology. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics – Volume 1. ICINCO, SciTePress, 191–198. DOI: 10.5220/0005540501910198

Bischoff, J. – Maciejewski, M. (2016): Simulation of City-wide Replacement of Private Cars with Autonomous Taxis in Berlin. Proc. Comput. Sci., Vol. 83., 237–244.

Blechar, J. – Constantiou, I. D. – Damsgaard, J. (2006): Understanding behavioural patterns of advanced mobile service users. Electronic Government, Vol. 3., No. 1., 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1504/eg.2006.008494.

Blok, V. – Lemmens, P. (2015): The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons why it is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation. In: Koops, B.-J. – Oosterlaken, I. – Romijn, H. – Swierstra, T. – Van den Hoven, J.: Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 19–35.

Blommestein, H. J. (2006): Why is ethics not part of modern economics and finance? A historical perspective. Finance Bien Commun, 1. 54–64.

Blyth, P. L. – Mladenovic, M. N. – Nardi, B. A. – Su, N. M. – Ekbia, H. R. (2015): Driving the Self-Driving Vehicle. Expanding the Technological Design Horizon. 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS). Dublin, Ireland.

Boban, M. – Kousaridas, A. – Manolakis, K. – Eichinger, J. – Xu, W. (2017): Use Cases, Requirements, and Design Considerations for 5G V2X. Ithaca, NY. Elérhető: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1712.01754. (Letöltve: 2023. február 20.)

Boesch, P. M. – Ciari, F. (2015): Agent-based simulation of autonomous cars. In: 2015 American Control Conference (ACC). IEEE, 2588–2592.

Bonnefon, J. F. – Shariff, A. – Rahwan, I. (2016): The Social Dilemma of Autonomous Vehicles. Science, Vol. 352., No. 6293., 1573–1576. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf2654

Bösch, P. M. – Becker, F. – Becker, H. – Axhausen, K. W. (2018): Cost-based analysis of autonomous mobility services. Transport Policy, 64, 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.09.005.

Brait, A. (2020): Attitudes of Austrian history teachers towards memorial site visits. Eine Analyse mithilfe von MAXQDA zeitgeschichte. 47, 441–466. https://doi.org/10.14220/zsch.2020.47.4.441

Branthwaite, A. – Patterson, S. (2011): The power of qualitative research in the era of social media. Qualitative Market Research: an International Journal, 14(4), 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522751111163245.

Brovarone, E. V. – Scudellari, J. – Staricco, L. (2021): Planning the transition to autonomous driving: A policy pathway towards urban liveability. Cities, Vol. 108., 102996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102996.

Burget, M. – Bardone, E. – Pedaste, M. (2017): Definitions and conceptual dimensions of responsible research and innovation: A literature review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(1), 1–19.

Buzás N. – Lukovics M. (2015): A felelősségteljes innovációról. Közgazdasági Szemle, 62. évf., 4. sz., 438–456. https://doi.org/10.14267/veztud.2017.09.09

Cam, H. – Cam, A. V. – Demirel, U. – Ahmed, S. (2024): Sentiment analysis of financial Twitter posts on Twitter with the machine learning classifiers. Heliyon, Vol. 10., No. 1., e23784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23784

Campisi, T. – Severino, A. – Al-Rashid, M. A. – Pau, G. (2021): The Development of the Smart Cities in the Connected and Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) Era: From Mobility Patterns to Scaling in Cities. Infrastructures, Vol. 6., No. 7., 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures6070100

CDEI (2022): Responsible Innovation inSelf-Driving Vehicles. Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation, London, United Kingdom.

CEG (2019): Autonomous/Connected Vehicles Readiness Plan. City of Elk Grove, USA.

CEK (2019): Autonomous/Connected Vehicle Readiness Plan. City of Elk Grove, Elk Glove.

Ceron, A. – Curini, L. – Iacus, S. M. – Porro, G. (2014): Every tweet counts? how sentiment analysis of social media can improve our knowledge of citizens political preferences with an application to italy and france. New Media – Society, Vol. 16., No. 2., 340–358.

CGPS (2017): Stick Shift: Autonomous Vehicles, Driving Jobs, and the Future of Work. Center for Global Policy Solutions, Washington, DC.

Chajka-Cadin, L. – Petrella, M. – Plotnick, S. (2020): Intelligent Transportation Systems Deployment: Findings from the 2019 Connected Vehicle and Automated Vehicle Survey. US Department of Transportation, Washington.

Chapin, T. – Stevens, L. – Crute J. – Crandall, J. – Rokyta, A. – Washington, A. (2016): Envisioning Florida’s Future: Transportation and Land Use in an Automated Vehicle World. Final Report. Florida State University Department of Urban – Regional Planning, Tallahassee.

Chauhan, G. S. – Meena, Y. K. (2019): YouTube video ranking by aspect-based sentiment analysis on user feedback, Soft Comput. Signal Process., 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3600-3_6

Chehri, A. – Mouftah, H. T. (2020): Localization for Vehicular Ad Hoc Network and Autonomous Vehicles, Are We Done Yet? In: Mouftah, H. T. – Erol-Kantarci, M. – Sorour, S. (eds.): Connected and Autonomous Vehicles in Smart Cities (1st ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429329401

Chen, A. – Shaheen, S. A. (2016): Planning for Shared Mobility. American Planning Association, Chicago, USA.

Chen, J. – Chen, H. – Gao, J. – Pattinson, J.-A. – Quaranta, R. (2021): A business model and cost analysis of automated platoon vehicles assisted by the Internet of things. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 235(2–3), 721–731. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407020949726

Choi, J. K. – Ji, Y. G. (2015): Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 31., No. 10., 692–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549

Chorus, C. – Van Wee, B. – Zwart, S. (2012): TPM Catalogue. Concepts, Theories, Methods. Delft University of Technology, Delft.

Cisler, D. – Greenwood, P. M. – Roberts, D. M. – McKendrick, R. – Baldwin, C. L. (2019): Comparing the relative strenghts of EEG and low-cost physiological devices in modelling attention allocation in semiautnomous vehicles. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 13.

Clark, K. R. – Leslie, K. R. – Garcia, M. G. – Tullman, M. L. (2018): How advertisers can keep mobile users engaged and reduce video-ad blocking: Best practices for video-ad placement and delivery based on consumer neuroscience measures. Journal of Advertising Research, 58(3), 311–325.

Clark, B. Y. – Larco, N. – Mann, R. F. (2017): The Impacts of Autonomous Vehicles and E-Commerce on Local Government Budgeting and Finance. University of Oregon, Portland. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3009840, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3009840

Clements, L. M. – Kockelman, K. M. (2017): Economic Effectst of Automated Vehicles. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 2606., 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3141/2606-14

Cohen, T. – Stilgoe, J. – Cavoli, C. (2018): Reframing the governance of automotive automation: insights from UK stakeholder workshops. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 5(5309), 1–23. DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2018.1495030

Cohen, T. – Stilgoe, J. – Stares, S. – Akyelken, N. – Cavoli, C. – Day, J. – Dickinson, J. – Fors, V. – Hopkins, D. – Lyons, G. –Marres, N. – Newman, J. – Reardon, L. – Sipe, N. – Tennant, C. – Wadud, Z. – Wigley, E. (2020): A constructive role for social science in the development of automated vehicles. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 6., 100133.

Cohen, T. – Cavoli, C. (2019): Automated vehicles: Exploring possible consequences of government (non) intervention for congestion and accessibility. Transport Reviews, 39(1), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1524401

Corwin, S. – Jameson, N. – Pankratz, D. M. – Willigmann, P. (2016): The Future of Mobility: What’s Next? Tomorrow’s Mobility Ecosystem – and How to Succeed in It. Deloitte University Press.

Costa, J. V. – De Feritas, C. L. – Paiva, T. (2015): Brain imaging during advertising: A neuromarketing study of sound and pictures. The Marketing Review, 15(4), 405–422.

COT (2019): Automated Vehicles Readiness Schedule and Budget 2020–22. City of Toronto, Toronto.

Creswell, J. W. (2013): Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 3rd Edition. SAGE Publications, US.

Cui, Q. – Wang, Y. – Chen, K. C. – Ni, W. – Lin, I. C. – Tao, X. –Zhang, P. (2018): Big data analytics and network calculus enabling intelligent management of autonomous vehicles in a smart city. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(2), 2021–2034.

Csizmadia Z. – Rechnitzer J. (2021) (szerk.): Az önvezető járművek világa. Társadalmi hatások és kihívások. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.

Csizmadia Z. (2019): Az autonóm, önvezető technológiák elterjedéséének társadalmi következményei – kérdések, dilemmák és szempontok. Tér Gazdaság Ember, 7. évf., 1. sz., 59–86.

Csizmadia Z. (2021): Az autonóm és önvezető járművekkel kapcsolatos ismeretek, tapasztalatok és általános vélekedések. In: Csizmadia Z. – Rechnitzer J. (szerk.): Az önvezető járművek világa. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest. DOI: 10.1556/9789634546290

Dale-Johnson, D. (2019): Preparing for Autonomous Vehicles: A Survey of Local Governments. NAIOP Research Foundation, Hemdon.

Danner, H. – Menapace, L. (2020): Using online comments to explore consumer beliefs regarding organic food in German-speaking countries and the United States. Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 83., 103912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103912.

Das, S. – Dutta, A. – Lindheimer, T. et al. (2019): YouTube as a source of information in understanding autonomous vehicle consumers: natural language processing study. Transp. Res. Rec. 2673(8).

Davis, F. D. (1989): Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 137–340.

Davis, J. B. (2018): Ethics and Economics: A Complex Systems Approach. In: White, M. D. (ed.): Handbook of Ethics and Economics. Oxford University Press. Elérhető: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID3172990_code233483.pdf?abstractid=3172990&mirid=1 (Letöltve: 2025. március 10.)

Day, G. S. – Schoemaker, P. J. (2000): Avoiding the pitfalls of emerging technologies. California Management Review, 42(2), 8–33.

De Almeida Correia, G. H. – Looff, E. – Van Cranenburgh, S. –Snelder, M. – Van Arem, B. (2019): On the impact of vehicle automation on the value of travel time while performing work and leisure activities in a car: Theoretical insights and results from a stated preference survey. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 119., 359–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.11.016

Deák, I. – Lukovics, M. (2014): Responsible innovation and R&D&I controlling. In: Buzás, N. – Lukovics, M. (eds): Responsible Innovation. SZTE GTK, Szeged. 101–120.

Delbosc, A. (2017): Delay or forgo? A closer look at youth driver licensing trends in the United States and Australia. Transportation, 44(5), 919–926. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11116-016-9685-7

Ding, Y. – Korolov, R. – Wallace, W. – Wang, X. (2021): How are sentiments on autonomous vehicles influenced? An analysis using Twitter feeds. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 131., 103356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103356

Dixon, G. – Hart, P. S. – Clarke, C. – O’Donnell, N. H. – Hmielowski, J. (2020): What drives support for self-driving car technology in the Untied States. J. Risk Res. 23(3), 275–287.

DMV (2024): Desengagement Reports. Department of Motor Vehicles, Los Angeles.

DMV (2025): Desengagement Reports. Department of Motor Vehicles, Los Angeles.

Dong, X. – DiScenna, M. – Guerra, E. (2017). Transit user perceptions of driverless buses. Transportation, 46(5–6), 1–16. DOI 10.1007/s11116-017-9786-y

Du, H. – Ge, Z. – Zheng, J. (2021): Why travelers trust and accept self-driving cars: An empirical study. Travel Behaviour and Society, Vol. 22., 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.06.012.

Duarte, F. – Ratti, C. (2018): The Impact of Autonomous Vehicles on Cities: A Review. Journal of Urban Technology, 25(6), 1–16. DOI:10.1080/10630732.2018.1493883.

Dupont, L. – Antrop, M. – Eetvelde, V. V. (2014): Eye-tracking Analysis in Landscape Perception Research: Influence of Photograph Properties and Landscape Characteristics. Landsc. Res., 39(4), 417–432.

DuPuis, N. – Cooper, M. – Brooks, R. (2015): City of the Future. Technology&Mobility. National League of Cities, Center for City Solutions and Applied Research, Washington DC.

Duvall, T. – Safran, B. – Hannon, E. – Katseff, J. – Wallace, T. (2019): A new look at autonomous-vehicle infrastructure. McKinsey and Company, Washington DC. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/capital-projects-and-infrastructure/our-insights/a-new-look-at-autonomous-vehicle-infrastructure (Letöltve: 2025. március 10.)

EC (2011): DG Research Workshop on Responsible Research – Innovation in Europe. European Commission, Brussels.

EC (2013): Innovation Union Scoreboard. European Council, Brussels.

EC (2014): Responsible Research and Innovation. Europe’s ability to respond to societal challenges. European Commission, Brussels.

EC (2018): Europe on the Move. Sustainable Mobility for Europe: safe, connected, and clean. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Europian Comission, Brussels. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal. (Letöltve: 2023. február 20.)

EC (2020): Ethics of Connected and Automated Vehicles: recommendations on road safety, privacy, fairness, explainability and responsibility. Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

Eden, G. – Jirotka, M. – Stahl, B. (2013): Responsible Research and Innovation: Critical reflection into the potential social consequences of ICT. Conference paper. 29–31 May 2013.

Elia G. – Bargis, M. – Galante, M. P. – Magnani, N. P. – Santilli, L. – Romano, G. – Zaffiro, G. (2019): Connected Transports, V2X and 5G: Standard, Services and the TIM – Telecom Italia Experiences. AEIT International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive (AEIT AUTOMOTIVE). Turin, Italy, 2019. DOI: 10.23919/EETA.2019.8804510.

Ellis, K. – Lyon-Hill, S. – Tilashalski, M. – Travis, E. (2020): Measuring the Effects of Drone Delivery in the United States. Elérhető: https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/ 100104/Effects%20of%20Drone%20Delivery%20US_September%202020.pdf (Letöltve: 2025. március 10.)

Enyedi F. – Pál V. (2021): A zajterhelés és a társadalmi konfliktusok összefüggéseinek megjelenése mentális térképeken Szeged példáján. Modern Geográfia, 16(3), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.15170/MG.2021.16.03.05

ERTRAC (2019): Connected Automated Driving Roadmap. ERTRAC Working Group „Connectivity and Automated Driving.” Elérhető: https://www.ertrac.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/ERTRAC-CAD-Roadmap-2019.pdf (Letöltve: 2025. március 10.)

Eurocities (2018): Integrating Transport Automation in the Urban System.

Európai Bizottság (2019): The future of cities; opportunities, challenges and the way forward. European Commission, Brussels.

Eurostat (2024): Passenger cars in the EU. Eurostat, Brussels.

Fagan, M. – Comeaux, D. – Gillies, B. (2021): Autonomous Vehicles Are Coming: Five Policy Actions Cities Can Take Now to Be Ready. Taubman Center for State and Local Government, Cambridge.

Fagnant, D. J. – Kockelman, K. M. (2015): Dynamic ride-sharing and optimal fleet sizing for a system of shared autonomous vehicles. In: Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting.

Fagnant, D. J. – Kockelman, K. M. (2016): Dynamic ride-sharing and fleet sizing for a system of shared autonomous vehicles in Austin. Texas. Transportation (Amst), Vol. 45., 143–158.

Fagnant, D. J. – Kockelman, K. M. – Bansal P. (2015): Operations of shared autonomous vehicle fleet for Austin, Texas, Market. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, 2536(2536), 98–106.

Fagnant, D. J. – Kockelman, K. M. (2014): The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 40., 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.12.001

Fayyaz, M. – González-González, E. – Nogués, S. (2022): Autonomous vehicles in sustainable cities: Re-claiming public spaces for people. SUPTM 2022 conference proceedings. https://doi.org/ 10.31428/xxxxx

Felt, U. – Fochler, M. – Sigl, L. (2018): IMAGINE RRI. A card-based method for reflecting on responsibility in life science research. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 5(3), 201–224. DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2018.1457402

Figliozzi, M. A. – Jennings, D. (2020): Autonomous delivery robots and their potential impacts on urban freight energy consumption and emissions. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 46., 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.159

Fisher, E. – Mahajan, R. L. (2006): Contradictory intent? US federal legislation on integrating societal concerns into nanotechnology research and development. Science and Public Policy, Vol. 33., No. 1., 5–16. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154306781779181

Fisher, E. – Maricle, G. (2015): Higher-level responsiveness? Socio-technical integration within US and UK nanotechnology research priority setting. Science and Public Policy, Vol. 42., No. 1., 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu017

Fisher, E. – Rip, A. (2013): Responsible innovation: multi-level dynamics and soft intervention practices. In: Owen, R. – Bessant, J. – Heintz, M. (eds.): Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. John Wiley & Sons. 165–183.

Fisher, E. – Schuurbiers D. (2013): Midstream modulation. In: Schuurbiers, N. – Van de Poel, D. – Gorman, I. – Doorn, M. E. (eds.): Opening up the Laboratory: Approaches for Early Engagement with New Technology. Wiley-Blackwell, New York. 97–110.

Fisher, E. (2007): Integrating Science and Society in the Laboratory. In: Fisher, E: Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies. Los Alamos National Laboratory. Los Alamos, NM.

Fisher, E. – Maricle, G. (2014): Higher-Level Responsiveness? Socio-Technical Integration within US and UK Nanotechnology Research Priority Setting. Sci. Public Policy. Vol. 42., No. 1., 72–85.

Fisher, E. – O’Rourke, M. – Evans, R. – Kennedy, E. B. – Gorman, M. E. – Seager, T. P. (2015): Mapping the integrative field: taking stock of socio-technical collaborations. J. Responsible Innov., 2(1), 39–61.

Fisher, E. – Mahajan, R. L. – Mitcham, C. (2006): Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance from Within. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 26(6), 485–496.

Fleetwood, J. (2017): Public Health, Ethics, and Autonomous Vehicles. American Journal of Public Health, 107., 532–537. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303628

Fleischer T. (2018): Gondolatok a közlekedés jövőjéről. LÉPÉSEK a fenntarthatóság felé, 23. évf., 1. sz., 4–7.

Flipse, S. M. – Van Dam, K. H. – Stragier, J. – Oude Vrielink, T. J. C. – Van Der Sanden, M. C. A. (2015): Operationalizing responsible research and innovation in industry through decision support in innovation practice. Journal on Chain and Network Science, 15(2), 135–146. https ://doi.org/10.3920/JCNS2 015.x004

Flipse, S. M. – Van Der Sanden, M. C. A. – Osseweijer, P. (2013): Midstream modulation in biotechnology industry: Redefining what is ‘part of the job’ of researchers in industry. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3), 1141–1164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9411-6

Flipse, S. M. – Van der Sanden, M. C. A. – Radstake, M. – De Winde, J. H. – Osseweijer, P. (2014): The DNA of socially responsible innovation. EMBO Rep. 15(2), 134–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/embr.201337949

Flipse, S. M. – Van der Sanden, M. C. A. – Osseweijer, P. (2014): Setting Up Spaces for Collaboration in Industry Between Researchers from the Natural and Social Sciences. Sci Eng Ethics, Vol. 20., 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9434-7

Foot, P. (1967): The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect. Oxford Review, 5, 5-15. o. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199252866.003.0002

Forsberg, E-M. – Quaglio, G. – O'Kane, H. – Karapiperis, T. – Woensel, L. von – Arnaldi, S. (2015): Assessment of science and technologies: Advising for and with responsibility. Technology in Society, Vol. 42., August, 21–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.12.004

Fraedrich, E. – Heinrichs, D. – Bahamonde-Birke, F. J. – Cyganski, R. (2019): Autonomous driving, the built environment and policy implications. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 122., 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.02.018.

Freemark, Y. – Hudson, A. – Zhao, J. (2020): Policies for Autonomy: How American Cities Envision Regulating Automated Vehicles. Urban Science, Vol. 4., No. 4., 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci4040055

Gaber, H. – Othman, A. M. – Fahad, A. H. (2021): Future of connected autonomous vehicles in smart cities. Solving Urban Infrastructure Problems Using Smart City Technologies, 599–611. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816816-5.00027-9

Gabrhel, V. – Ježek, S. – Havlíčková, D. (2019): Public opinion on connected and automated vehicles: the Czech context. Transactions on Transport Sciences, 10(2), 42–52. DOI: 10.5507/tots.2019.011.

Garidis, K. – Ulbricht, L. – Rossmann, A. – Schmäh, M. (2020): Toward a User Acceptance Model of Autonomous Driving. Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

Gáspár P. – Németh B. – Bokor J. (2019): Járműirányítás. Akadémia Kiadó, Budapest.

Gavanas, N. (2019): Autonomous road vehicles: Challenges for urban planning in European cities. Urban Science, 3(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci3020061

Glied, V. – Barkóczi, Cs. (2013): A fenntartható fejlődés elemeinek megjelenése a városfejlesztési stratégiákban a Dél-Dunántúlon. Modern Geográfia, 8(2), 1–46.

Golbabaei, F. – Yigitcanlar, T. – Paz, A. – Bunker, J. (2020): Individual predictors of autonomous vehicle public acceptance and intention to use: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 106.

Gomes, T. – Roriz, R. – Cunha, L. – Ganal, A. – Soares, N. – Araújo, T. – Monteiro, J. (2022): Evaluation and Testing System for Automotive LiDAR Sensors. Applied Sciences, 12(24), 13003. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122413003

González-González, E. – Nougés, S. – Stead, D. (2019): Automated vehicles and the city of tomorrow: A backcasting approach. Cities, Vol. 94., 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.034

Goodall, W. – Dovey Fishman, T. – Bornstein, J. – Bonthron, B. (2017): The rise of mobility as a service Reshaping how urbanites get around. Deloitte, London.

Green, P. E. – Srinivasan, V. (1990): Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400402

Grinbaum, A. – Groves, C. (2013): What is “Responsible” about Responsible Innovation? Understanding the Ethical Issues. In: Owen, R. – Bessant, J. – Heintz, M. (ed.): Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. John Wiley & Sons, 119–142.

Grindsted, T. S. – Christensen, T. H. – Freudendal-Pedersen, M. – Friis, F. – Hartmann-Petersen, K. (2022): The urban governance of autonomous vehicles – In love with AVs or critical sustainability risks to future mobility transitions. Cities, Vol. 120., 103504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103504.

Groshen, E. L. – Helper, S. – MacDuffie, J. P. – Carson, C. (2018): Preparing U.S. Workers and Employers for an Autonomous Vehicle Future. Study Prepared for Securing America’s Future Energy. Washington, DC.

Groth, S. – Kuhnimhof, T. (2021): Multimodality in transportation. In: Vickerman, R. (ed.): International encyclopedia of transportation. 5, Elsevier Ltd, UK, 118–126.

Guan, J. – Zhang, S. – D’Ambrosio, L. A. – Zhang, K. – Coughlin, J. F. (2021): Potential impacts of autonomous vehicles on urban sprawl: A comparison of Chinese and US car-oriented adults. Sustainability, 13(14), 7632. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147632

Guanetti, J. – Kim, Y. – Borrelli, F. (2018): Control of connected and automated vehicles: state of the art and future challenges. Annual Reviews in Control, Vol. 45., 18–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2018.04.011.

Gubó R. – Lukovics M. – Nádas N. (2019): A junior kutatók felelősségteljes innováció iránti fogékonyságának vizsgálata eltérő innovációs környezetben. Tér-Gazdaság-Ember, 7. évf., 2–3. sz., 9–30.

Gyimesi Á. (2019): Az autonóm gépjárművek hatása a kormányzati költségvetésre és a foglalkoztatásra. Tér-Gazdaság-Ember, 7. évf., 1. sz., 137–158.

Hakak, S. – Gadekallu, T. R. – Maddikunta, T. K. R. – Ramu, S. P. – De Alwis, P. M. C. –Liyanage, M. (2023): Autonomous vehicles in 5G and beyond: A survey. Vehicular Communications, Vol. 39., 100551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vehcom.2022.100551.

Hakeem, S. A. –Hady, A. A. –Kim, H. (2020): 5G-V2X: Standardization, architecture, use cases, network-slicing, and edge-computing. Wireless Netw., Vol. 26., 6015–6041. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11276-020-02419-8 (Letöltve: 2025. március 10.)

Harper, C. D. – Hendrickson, C. T. – Mangones, S. – Samaras, C. (2016): Estimating potential increases in travel with autonomous vehicles for the non-driving, elderly and people with travel-restrictive medical conditions. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, Vol. 72., 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.09.003

Harsanyi, J. C. (1977): Morality and the Theory of Rational Behaviour. Social Research, 44(4), 623–656.

Hasanujjaman, M. – Chowdhury, M. Z. – Jang, Y. M. (2023): Sensor Fusion in Autonomous Vehicle with Traffic Surveillance Camera System: Detection, Localization, and AI Networking. Sensors, 23(6), 3335. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23063335

Hausman, D. – Mcpherson, M. – Satz, D. (2016): Economic analysis, moral philosophy, and public policy. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Havlíčková, D. – Gabrhel, V. – Adamovská, E. – Zámečník, P. (2019): The role of gender and age in autonomous mobility: general attitude, awareness and media preference in the context of Czech Republic Transactions on Transport Sciences, 10(2), 53–63.

Hegner, S. M. – Beldad, A. D. – Brunswick, G. J. (2019): In Automatic We Trust: Investigating the Impact of Trust, Control, Personality Characteristics, and Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivations on the Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35(19), 1769–1780. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1572353

Henseler, J. – Ringle, C. M. – Sarstedt, M. (2015): A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 43., No. 1., 115–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Henseler, J. – Ringle, C. M. – Sinkovics, R. R. (2009): The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In: Sinkovics, R. R. – Ghauri, P. N. (eds.): New Challenges to International Marketing: Advances in International Marketing. Vol. 20. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. 277–319.

Herrenkind, B. – Brendel, A. B. – Nastjuk, I. – Greve, M. – Kolbe, L. M. (2019a): Investigating end-user acceptance of autonomous electric buses to accelerate diffusion. Transportation Research Part D., Vol. 74., 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.08.003

Herrenkind, B. – Nastjuk, I. – Brendel, A. B. – Trang, S. – Kolbe, L. M. (2019b): Young people’s travel behavior – Using the life-oriented approach to understand the acceptance of autonomous driving. Transportation Research Part D., Vol. 74., 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.07.023

Hjorthol, R. (2016): Decreasing popularity of the car? Changes in driving licence and access to a car among young adults over a 25-year period in Norway. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 51., 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.12.006

Hollander, J. B. – Purdy, A. – Wiley, A. – Foster, V. – Jacob, R. J. K. – Taylor, H. A. – Brunyé, T. T. (2019): Seeing the city: using eye-tracking technology to explore cognitive responses to the built environment. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 12(2), 156–171. DOI: 10.1080/17549175.2018.1531908

Holstein, T. (2017): The Misconception of Ethical Dilemmas in Self-Driving Cars. In Dodig-Crnkovic, G. (ed.): Proceedings of the Summit of the International Society for the Study of Information on Digitalisation for a Sustainable Society: Embodied, Embedded, Networked, Empowered through Information, Computation – Cognition. Göteborg, Sweden.

Horváthy B. (2021): Önvezető autók a WTO műhelyében – A nemzetközi kereskedelmi jog technológiai kihívásai. Külgazdaság, LXV. évf., november–december, 87–108. https://doi.org/10.47630/KULG.2021.65.11-12.87

Hőgye-Nagy, Á. – Kovács, G. – Kurucz, Gy. (2023): Acceptance of self-driving cars among the university community: Effects of gender, previous experience, technology adoption propensity, and attitudes toward autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 94(2), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2023.03.005.

Huang, G. – Hung, Y-H. – Proctor, R.W. – Pitts, B.J. (2022): Age is more than just a number: The relationship among age, non-chronological age factors, self-perceived driving abilities, and autonomous vehicle acceptance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 178., 106850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106850

Hudson, J. – Orviska, A. – Hunady, J. (2019): People’s attitudes to autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part A., Vol. 121., 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.018

Hunecke, M. – Groth, S. – Wittowsky, D. (2020): Young social milieus and multimodality: Interrelations of travel behaviours and psychographic characteristics. Mobilities, 15(3), 397–415.

Hutchins, N. – Hook, L. (2017): Technology acceptance model for safety critical autonomous transportation systems. 2017 IEEE/AIAA 36th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC). 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.2017.8102010

Iatridis, K. – Schroeder, D. (2016): Responsible research and innovation in industry: the case for corporate responsibility tools. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21693-5

Imreh-Tóth, M. – Imreh, Sz. (2014): Entrepreneurship Education for responsible innovation. In: Buzás, N. – Lukovics, M. (eds.): Responsible innovation. JATEPress, Szeged, 73–84.

INRIX (2017): Highly Autonomous Vehicle City Evaluation. INRIX. http://inrix.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/INRIX-Automated-Veh icle-Study-2017_FINAL.pdf (Letöltve: 2025. március 5.)

Inzelt, A. – Csonka, L. (2014): Responsible Science in Societies. In: Buzás, N. – Lukovics, M. (eds.): Responsible innovation. JATEPress, Szeged, 57–72.

Io, H. N. – Lee, C. B. – Lian, Z. (2022): Sentiments about autonomous vehicles. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 66., 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2022.101717.

ITF (2015): Automated and Autonomous Driving: Regulation under Uncertainty. International Transport Forum Policy Papers, No. 7. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlwvzdfk640-en

Ivus, M. – Kirk, B. – Taillon, P. J. (2020): Advances in connected – autonomous vehicles. Information and Communications Technology Council and CAVCOE, Canada.

Janatabadi, F. – Ermagun, A. (2022): Empirical evidence of bias in public acceptance of autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 84., 330–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.12.005

Jászberényi, M. – Miskolczi, M. – Munkácsy, A. – Földes, D. (2022): What drives tourists to adopt self-driving cars? Transportation Research Part F, Vol. 89., 407–422.

Jászberényi, M. – Ásványi, K. – Csiszár, Cs. – Kökény, L. (2024): Demographic and social differences in autonomous vehicle technology acceptance in Hungary. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 72., 101813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2024.101813

Jefferson, J. – McDonald, A. D. (2019): The autonomous vehicle social network: Analyzing tweets after a recent Tesla autopilot crash. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. SAGE Publications, Sage, Los Angeles, 2071–2075.

Jiang, L. – Chen, H. – Chen, Z. (2022): City readiness for connected and autonomous vehicles: A multi-stakeholder and multi-criteria analysis through analytic hierarchy process. Transport Policy, 128(6), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.09.012

Jing, P. – Xu, G. – Chen, Y. – Shi, Y. – Zhan, F. (2020): The Determinants behind the Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, Vol. 12., No. 5. 1719. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051719

Johnson, C. (2017): Readiness of the road network for connected and autonomous vehicles. RAC Foundation -Royal Automobile Club for Motoring Ltd, London.

Jung, J. Y. – Mellers, B. A. (2016): American Attitudes Toward Nudges. Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 11., No. 1., 62–74.

Kacperski, C. –Vogel, T. – Kutzner, F. (2020): Ambivalence in stakeholders’ views on connected and autonomous vehicles. In: International Conference on Human Computer Interaction. Springer, Cham, 46–57.

Kagermann, H. – Anderl, R. – Gausemeier, J. – Schuh, G. – Wahlster, W. (2016): Industrie 4.0 in a Global Context: Strategies for Cooperating with International Partners. Acatech Study. München, Deutschland.

Kagermann, H. (2017): Die Mobilitätswende: Die Zukunft der Mobilität ist elektrisch, vernetzt und automatisiert. In: Hildebrandt, A. – Landhäußer, W.(eds.): CSR und Digitalisierung: der digitale Wandel als Chance und Herausforderung für Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Springer Gabler. 357–371.

Kapser, S. – Abdelrahman, M. (2020): Acceptance of autonomous delivery vehicles for last-mile delivery in Germany – Extending UTAUT2 with risk perceptions. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 111., 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.12.016

Kargol-Wasiluk, A. – Wildowicz-Giegiel, A. – Zalesko, M. (2018): The Evolution of the Economic Man. From Homo Oeconomicus to Homo Moralis. Gospodarka Narodova, The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, 293(1), 33–57.

Katoshevski, R. – Timmermans, H. (2001): Using Conjoint Analysis to Formulate User-centred Guidelines for Urban Design: The Example of New Residential Development in Israel. Journal of Urban Design, 6(1), 37–53. DOI: 10.1080/13574800120032888

Kaur, H. – Ahsaan, S. U. –Alankar, B. – Chang, V. (2021): A proposed sentiment analysis deep learning algorithm for analyzing COVID-19 tweets. Inf. Syst. Front, 23(6), 1417–1429. DOI: 10.1007/s10796-021-10135-7

Kazár K. (2014): A PLS-útelemzés és alkalmazása egy márkaközösség pszichológiai érzetének vizsgálatára. Statisztikai Szemle, 94. évf., 2. sz., 33–52.

Kecskés E. – Lukovics M. (2023): Az önvezetőjármű-használat techno-ökonómiai megközelítése. Polgári Szemle, 19. évf., 1-3. sz., 181–196. DOI: 10.24307/psz.2023.0912

Kecskés G. (2020): Az autonóm járművek jogi kérdéseinek nemzetközi kontextusa, különös tekintettel a környezetjogi vetületekre. Állam- és Jogtudomány, 61(4), 52–64.

Keeney, T. (2017): Mobility-As-A-Service: Why Self-Driving Cars Could Change Everything. Research White Paper, ARK Invest, New York.

Kesselring, S. – Freudendal-Pedersen, M. – Zuev, D. (2020): Sharing mobilities: New perspectives for the mobile risk society. Routledge, New York and London.

Keszey, T. (2020): Behavioural intention to use autonomous vehicles: Systematic review and empirical extension. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 119., 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.10273

Keszey, T. – Zsukk, J. (2017): Az új technológiák fogyasztói elfogadása. A magyar és nemzetközi szakirodalom áttekintése és kritikai értékelése. Vezetéstudomány – Budapest Management Review, 48(10), 38–47. DOI https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2017.10.05

Kézy B. – Szűcs P. – Lukovics M. (2018): Sétálhatósági tervezés a városfejlesztésben. In: Lengyel I. (szerk.): Térségek növekedése és fejlődése: egészségipari és tudásalapú fejlesztési stratégiák. JATEPress, Szeged, 261–275.

Khan, J. A. – Wang L. – Jacobs, E. – Talebian, A. – Mishra, S. – Santo, C. A. – Golias, M. – Astorne-Figari, C. (2019): Smart Cities Connected and Autonomous Vehicles Readiness Index. ACM SCC, Portland, OR, United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357492.3358631

Khusna, N. I. – Sumarmi – Bachri, S. – Astina, I. K. – Susilo, S. – Idris (2023): Social resilience and disaster resilience: A strategy in disaster management efforts based on big data analysis in Indonesian's twitter users. Heliyon, Vol. 9., No. 9., Ze19669, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19669

Kim, K. – Rousseau, G. – Freedman, J. – Nicholson, J. (2015): The travel impact of autonomous vehicles in metro Atlanta through activity-based modeling. The 15th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference, Atlantic City NJ.

Kim, M.-K. – Park, J.-H. – Oh, J. – Lee, W.-S. – Chung, D. (2019): Identifying and prioritizing the benefits and concerns of connected and autonomous vehicles: a comparison of individual and expert perceptions. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. Vol. 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100438.

Kimley-Horn & Associates (2016): NC readiness for connected and autonomous vehicles (CAV). Final Report.

Kimmel, S. C. – Toohey, N. M. – Delborne, J. A. (2016): Roadblocks to responsible innovation: Exploring technology assessment and adoption in U.S. public highway construction. Technology in Society, Vol. 44., 66–77.

Ko, E. – Kim, Y. (2020): Why Do Firms Implement Responsible Innovation? The Case of Emerging Technologies in South Korea. Sci Eng Ethics. Vol. 26., 2663–2692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00224-2

Kohl, C. – Mostafa, D. – Böhm, M. – Krcmar, H. (2017): Disruption of Individual Mobility Ahead? A Longitudinal Study of Risk and Benefit Perceptions of Self-Driving Cars on Twitter. In: Leimeister, J. M. – Brenner, W. (eds.): Proceedings der 13. Internationalen Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2017). St. Gallen, S. 1220–1234

Kornai, J. (2010): Innovation and dynamism: Interaction between systems and technical progress. The Economics of Transition, Vol. 18., 629–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2010.00396.x.

Koul, S. – Eydgahi, A. (2018): Utilizing technology acceptance model (TAM) for driverless car technology adoption. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 13(4), 37–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242018000400037

Kovačić, M. – Mutavdžija, M. – Buntak, K. (2022): New Paradigm of Sustainable Urban Mobility: Electric and Autonomous Vehicles – A Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, 14(15), 9525. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159525

Kovács D. (2018): Az önvezető autók fejlődése – Koncepciótól az aszfaltig. IGN Hungary, Budapest.

Kovács P. – Bodnár G. (2017): Examining the Factors of Endogenous Development in Hungarian Rural Areas by Means of PLS Path Analysis. Regional Statistics, Vol. 7., No.1., 90–114. DOI: 10.15196/RS07106.

Kovács P. – Bodnár G. (2016): Az endogén fejlődés értelmezése vidéki térségekben PLS-útelemzés segítségével. Statisztikai Szemle, 92. évf., 1. sz., 143–161.

Kovács, P. – Lukovics, M. (2022): Factors influencing public acceptance of self-driving vehicles in a post-socialist environment: Statistical modelling in Hungary. Regional Statistics, 12(2), 149–176.

Kovács, P. – Lukovics, M. (2024): Statistical analysis of Hungarian cities’ autonomous vehicle preparedness: correlations, ranking and neural network. Regional Statistics, Vol. 14., No. 5., 922–944. DOI: 10.15196/RS140505

Kovács, P. – Bodnár, G. – Lengyel, I. (2023): Relationships between factors of regional competitiveness in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of International Studies, 16(3), 78–96. DOI: 10.14254/2071-8330.2023/16-3/4

König, M. – Neumayr, L. (2017): Users’ resistance towards radical innovations: The case of the self-driving car. Transportation Research Part F, Vol. 44., 42–52. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.10.013

KPMG (2018): Autonomous Vehicles Readiness Index. Assessing countries’ openness and pre-paredness for autonomous vehicles. KPMG International, Amstelveen.

KPMG (2020): Autonomous Vehicles Readiness Index. Assessing countries’ openness and pre-paredness for autonomous vehicles. KPMG International, Amstelveen.

Kuckartz, U. – Rädiker, S. (2019): Introduction: Analyzing qualitative data with software. In: Analyzing Qualitative Data with MAXQDA. Cham, Springer, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15671-8_1

Kulkarni, D. – Rodd, S. (2018): Extensive study of text based methods for opinion mining, in 2018. 2nd International Conference on Inventive, Systems and Control (ICISC). IEEE.

Kurucz Gy. – Varró G. – Hőgye-Nagy Á. – Kovács G. (2022): Az önvezető járművek elfogadása kérdőív magyar nyelvű adaptációja és a technológia alkalmazására való hajlandósággal való összefüggései. Alkalmazott Pszichológia, 2022(1), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.17627/ALKPSZICH.2022.1.103

Kuutti, S. – Bowden, R. – Jin, Y. – Barber, P. – Fallah, S. (2021): A survey of deep learning applications to autonomous vehicle control. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 22(2), 712–733. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2019.2962338

Kyriakidis, M. – Happee, R. – De Winter, J. C. F. (2015): Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transportation Research Part F, Vol. 32., 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.014

Lados M. – Tóth M. L. (2019): Autonóm járművek az okos városokban. Tér-Gazdaság-Ember, 7. évf., 1., 159–174.

Lang, N. – Herrmann, A. – Hagenmaier, M. – Richter, M. (2020): Can Self-Driving Cars Stop the Urban Mobility Meltdown? BCG, University of St. Gallen.

Lau, S. F. G. – Van Ameijde, J. (2021): City Centres in the Era of Self-Driving Cars: Possibilities for the Redesign of Urban Streetscapes to Create Pedestrian-oriented Public Spaces. In: Globa, A. – Van Ameijde, J. – Fingrut, A. – Kim, N. – Lo, T. T. S. (eds.): PROJECTIONS. Proceedings of the 26th CAADRIA Conference. Volume 2. The Chinese University of Hong Kong and Online, Hong Kong, 609–618. https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.caadria.2021.2.609

Lavieri, P. S. – Garikapati, V. M. – Bhat, C. R. – Pendyala, R. M. – Astroza, S. – Dias, F. F. (2017): Modeling individual preferences for ownership and sharing of autonomous vehicle technologies. Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board, Vol. 2665., No. 1., 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3141/2665-01

Lazarus, S. – Button, M. – Adogame, A. (2022): Advantageous comparison: using Twitter responses to understand similarities between cybercriminals (“Yahoo Boys”) and politicians (“Yahoo men”). Heliyon, Vol. 8., No. 11., e11142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11142

Lee, J. – Yang, J. H. (2020): Analysis of drivers’s EEG given take-over alarm in SAE levfel 3 automated driving in simulated environment. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 21(3), 719–728.

Lee, N. – Brandes, L. – Chamberlain, L. – Senior C. (2017): This is your brain on neuromarketing: reflecions on a decade of research. Journal of Marketing Managemen, 33(11–12), 878–892.

Lee, D. – Hess, J. D. (2020): Regulations for on-road testing of connected and automated vehicles: Assessing the potential for global safety harmonization. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 136., 85–98.

Lee, J. – Yang, J. H. (2020): Analysis of driver’s EEG given take-over alarm in SAE level 3 automated driving in a simulated environment. Int. J. Automot. Technol., Vol. 21., 719–728.

Lemmer, K. (2015): Neue autoMobilität: Automatisierter Straßenverkehr der Zukunft. Acatech, Munich.

Lengyel I. (2010): Regionális gazdaságfejlesztés. Versenyképesség, klaszterek és alulról szerveződő stratégiák. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.

Lengyel I. (2021): Regionális és városgazdaságtan. Szegedi Egyetemi Kiadó, Szeged.

Lengyel I. (2024): A térbeli szerveződés logikái: városok és városrendszerek. COMITATUS Önkormányzati Szemle, 34. évf., 250. sz. 201–208. DOI: 10.59809/Comitatus.2024.34-250.201

Lengyel I. – Rechnitzer J. (2004): Regionális gazdaságtan. Dialóg Campus, Budapest-Pécs.

Lengyel I. – Szakálné Kanó I. – Vas Zs. – Lengyel B. (2016): Az újraiparosodás térbeli kérdőjelei Magyarországon. Közgazdasági Szemle, LXIII. évf., 6. sz., 615–646. DOI: 10.18414/KSZ.2016.6.615

Lengyel I. – Szakálné Kanó I. – Vida Gy. (2023): A gazdasági szerkezetváltás térbeli jellemzői Kelet-Közép-Európában 2000–2019 között. In: Szanyi M. – Szunomár Á. – Török Á. (szerk.): Trendek és töréspontok IV. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest. 147–190.

Lengyel, H. – Tettamanti, T. – Szalay, Z. (2020): Conflicts of Automated Driving With Conventional Traffic Infrastructure. IEEE Access, Vol. 8., 163280–163297. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3020653.

Lerner-Lam, E. – Celniker, S. P. – Halbert, G. W. – Chellman, C. – Ryan, S. (1992): Neo-Traditional Neighborhood Design and Its Implications for Traffic Engineering. ITE Journal, Vol. 62., No. 1., 17–24.

Li, T. – Lin, L. – Choi, M. – Gong, S. – Wang, J. (2018): YouTube AV 50k: An annotated corpus for comments in autonomous vehicles. In: 2018 International Joint Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Processing (iSAI-NLP). Pattaya, Thailand. 1–5. DOI: 10.1109/iSAI-NLP.2018.8692799

Li, Z. – Li, R. – Jin, G. (2020): Sentiment analysis of danmaku videos based on Naïve Bayes and sentiment dictionary, IEEE Access, Vol. 8., 75073–75084. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2986582

Liao, B. –Van den Berg, P. E. W. – Van Wesemael, P. J. V. – Arentze, T. A. (2022): Individuals' perception of walkability: Results of a conjoint experiment using videos of virtual environments, Cities, Vol. 125., 103650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103650.

Liljamo, T. – Liimatainen, H. – Pöllänen, M. – Viri, R. (2021): The Effects of Mobility as a Service and Autonomous Vehicles on People’s Willingness to Own a Car in the Future. Sustainability, 13(4), 1962. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041962

Liljamo, T. – Liimatainen, H. – Pöllänen, M. (2018): Attitudes and concerns on automated vehicles. Transp. Res. Part F Tra_c Psychol. Behav. Vol. 59., Part A, 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.010

Lin, C. Y. – Chen, K. C. – Wickramasuriya, D. – Lien, S. Y. – Gitlin, R. D. (2018): Anticipatory mobility management by big data analytics for ultra-low latency mobile networking. IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). IEEE, 1–7.

Lin, P. (2016): Why Ethics Matters for Autonomous Cars. In: Maurer, M. – Gerdes, J. C. – Lenz, B. – Winner, H. (eds.): Autonomous Driving. Technical, Legal and Social Aspects. SpringerOpen, 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48847-8_4

Lipson, H. – Kurman, M. (2016): Driverless: intelligent cars and the road ahead. Mit Press.

Litman, T. (2017): Autonomous Vehicle Implementation Predictions Implications for Transport Planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute

Litman, T. (2015): Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions implications for transport planning. In Victoria Transport Policy Institute.

Liu, H. – Yang, R. – Wang, L. – Liu, P. (2019): Evaluating initial public acceptance of highly and fully autonomous vehicles. Int. J. Hum. Interact., 35(11), 919–931.

Liu, M. – Wu, J. – Zhu, C. – Hu, K. (2022): Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Robo-Taxi Services in China: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model Analysis. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 2022, No. 1., 8461212. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8461212

Liu, P. – Guo, Q. – Ren, F. – Wang, L. – Xu, Z. (2019): Willingness to pay for self-driving vehicles: Influences of demographic and psychological factors. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 100., 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.01.022.

Liu, Y. – Tight, M. – Sun, Q. – Kang, R. (2019): A systematic review: Road infrastructure requirement for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs). J. Phys. Conf. Ser. Vol. 1187, No., 4., 042073. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1187/4/042073.

Louviere, J. J. – Flynn, T. N. – Carson, R. T. (2010): Discrete Choice Experiments Are Not Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Choice Modelling, 3(3), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70014-9

Luce, R. D. – Tukey, J. W. (1964): Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 1., No. 1., 1–27.

Lukovics M. – Nagy B. (2021): A felelősségteljes innováció és a gazdasági racionalitás kapcsolatrendszere vállalati környezetben. Közgazdasági szemle, 68(4), 421–436. DOI: 10.18414/KSZ.2021.4.421

Lukovics M. – Udvari B. – Zuti B. – Kézy B. (2018): Az önvezető autók és a felelősségteljes innováció. Közgazdasági Szemle, 65(9), 949–974.

Lukovics M. – Zuti B. – Fisher E. – Kézy B. (2020): Autonomous cars and responsible innovation. In: Kosztopulosz, A. – Kuruczleki, É. (eds.): The Challenges of Analyzing Social and Economic Processes in the 21st Century. University of Szeged Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Szeged. https://doi.org/10.14232/casep21c.2

Lukovics M. (2023): Az összekapcsolt autonóm járművek mibenlétéről. Közlekedés és Mobilitás, 2. évf., 2. sz., 79–88. https://doi.org/10.55348/KM.33

Lukovics M. (2023): Összekapcsolt autonóm járművek: kihívások és válaszok a városfejlesztésben. COMITATUS: Önkormányzati Szemle, 33. évf., 245. sz. 73–90.

Lukovics M. – Fisher E. – Udvari B. (2016): A felelősségteljes innováció iránti fogékonyság fejlesztése a gyakorlatban. Marketing – Menedzsment, 50. évf., 2. sz., 3–18.

Lukovics M. – Flipse, S. M. – Udvari B. – Fisher, E. (2017): Responsible research and innovation in contrasting innovation environments: Socio-Technical Integration Research in Hungary and the Netherlands. Technology in Society, Vol. 51., 172–182. o. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.09.003

Lukovics M. – Nádas N. (2022): A felelősségteljes innováció szerepe az autonóm járművek és a társadalom viszonyrendszerében. Polgári Szemle, 18. évf., 4–6. sz., 295–317., DOI: 10.24307/psz.2022.1221

Lukovics M. – Udvari B. – Nádas N. – Fisher, E. (2019): Raising Awareness of Researchers-in-the-Making Toward Responsible Research and Innovation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Vol. 10., No. 4., 1558–1577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-019-00624-1

Lukovics M. – Udvari B. – Nádas N. (2017): A felelősségteljes innováció és a jövő kutatógenerációja. Vezetéstudomány, XLVIII. évf., 8–9. sz., 89–100. DOI: 10.14267/ VEZTUD.2017.09.09

Lukovics M. – Buzás N. – Huntingford, J. – Molnár G. (2016): Felelősségteljes innováció a délkelet-európai országokban. In Lengyel I. – Nagy B. (szerk.): Térségek versenyképessége, intelligens szakosodása és újraiparosodása. JATEPress, Szeged, 62–78.

Lukovics, M. – Fisher, E. (2017): Socio-Technical Integration Research in an Eastern-European Setting: Distinct Features, Challenges and Opportunities. Society – Economy, Vol. 39., No. 4., 501–528. DOI: 10.1556/204.2017.004

Lukovics, M. – Flipse, S. M. – Udvari, B. – Fisher, E. (2017): Responsible research and innovation in contrasting innovation environments: Socio-Technical Integration Research in Hungary and the Netherlands. Technology in Society, Vol. 51., 172–182.

Lukovics M. (2024): A városi önvezetőjármű-felkészültség kulcstényezőinek meghatározása strukturált szöveg- és tartalomelemzéssel. Modern Geográfia, 19(4), 85–109. https://doi.org/10.15170/MG.2024.19.04.05

Lukovics, M. – Prónay, Sz. – Majó-Petri, Z. – Kovács, P. – Ujházi, T. – Volosin, M. – Palatinus, Zs. – Keszey, T. (2023): Combining survey-based and neuroscience measurements in customer acceptance of self-driving technology. Transportation Research Part F, Vol. 95., 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2023.03.016

Lukovics, M. – Ujházi, T. (2024): Young adults’ preferences on the potential changes in urban environment triggered by AVs in Hungary. Journal of Urban Design, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2024.2422375

Lukovics M. – Udvari B. – Zuti B. – Kézy B. (2018): Az önvezető autók és a felelősségteljes innováció. Közgazdasági Szemle, 65(9), 949–974.

Luttrell, K. – Weaver, M. – Harris, M. (2015): The effect of autonomous vehicles on trauma and health care. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 79(4), 678–682. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000000816

Maciag, M. (2017): Special Report: How Autonomous Vehicles Could Constrain City Budgets. https://www.governing.com/gov-data/gov-how-autonomous-vehicles-could-effect-city-budgets.html (Letöltve: 2025- március 10.)

Madarász N. – Szikora P. (2018): Önvezető autók társadalmi elfogadottsága napjainkban. In: Csiszárik-Kocsir Á. – Garai-Fodor M. (szerk.): Vállalkozásfejlesztés a XXI. században. Óbudai Egyetem, Keleti Károly Gazdasági Kar, Budapest, 159–171.

Madigan, R. – Louw, T. – Wilbrink, M. – Schieben, A. – Merat, N. (2017): What inﬂuences the decision to use automated public transport? Using UTAUT to understand public acceptance of automated road transport systems. Transportation Research, Part F: Traﬃc Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 50., 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.07.007

Majó-Petri Z. – Huszár S. (2020): Autonóm járművek, önvezető autók: mit gondol a közönség? Közlekedéstudományi Szemle, 70(1), 66–75.

Makahleh, H. Y. – Ferranti, E. J. S. – Dissanayake, D. (2024): Assessing the Role of Autonomous Vehicles in Urban Areas: A Systematic Review of Literature. Future Transp. Vol. 4., 321–348. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp4020017

Malokin, A. – Circella, G. – Mokhtarian, P. L. (2019): How do activities conducted while commuting influence mode choice? Using revealed preference models to inform public transportation advantage and autonomous vehicle scenarios. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 124., 82–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.12.015

Maltese, I. – Zamparini, L. (2023): Sustainable mobility choices at home and within destinations: A survey of young Italian tourists. Research in Transportation Business and Management, Vol. 48., 100906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2022.100906

Manfreda, A. – Ljubi, K. – Groznik, A. (2019): Autonomous vehicles in the smart city era: An empirical study of adoption factors important for millennials. International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102050.

Manivasakan, H. – Kalra, R. – O’Hern, S. – Fang, Y. – Xi, Y. – Zheng, N. (2021): Infrastructure requirement for autonomous vehicle integration for future urban and suburban roads – Current practice and a case study of Melbourne, Australia. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 152., 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.07.012.

Maracke, C. (2017): Autonomes Fahren – ein Einblick in die rechtlichen Rahmenbedingungen. Wirtschaftsinformatik – Management, Vol. 9., 62–68.

Marcheschi, E. – Vogel, N. – Larsson, A. – Perander, S. – Koglin, T. (2022): Residents’ acceptance towards car-free street experiments: Focus on perceived quality of life and neighborhood attachment. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 14., 100585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100585.

Mares, R. – Stix, C. – Dewey, Sara (2018): How Autonomous Vehicles Will Drive Our Budgets. An Analysis of the Economic and Fiscal Impacts of Self-driving Cars on the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Conservation Law Foundation, Boston.

Martí, E. – Miguel, M. Á. D. – Fernández, F. G. – Pérez, J. (2019): A review of sensor technologies for perception in automated driving. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 11(4), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1109/mits.2019.2907630

Martinez, L. M. – Viegas, J. M. (2017): Assessing the impacts of deploying a shared self-driving urban mobility system: An agent-based model applied to the city of Lisbon, Portugal. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, Vol. 6., No. 1., 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2017.05.005.

Mathews, K. E. – Freeman, M. L. – Desvousges, W. H. (2006): How and how much? The role of information in stated choice questionnaires. In: Kanninen, B. J. (ed.): Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies: A Common Sense Approach to Theory and Practice. Springer.

Mathis, L. A. – Diederichs, F. – Widlroither, H. – Ruscio, D. – Napoletano, L. – Zofka, M. R. (2020): Creating informed public acceptance by a user-centered human-machine interface for all automated transport modes. In: Rethinking Transport. 8th Transport Research Arena TRA 2020. April 27–30, 2020. 9. Helsingfors, Finland.

McKinsey & Co. (2016): Automotive Revolution – Perspective towards 2030: How the Convergence of Disruptive Technology-Driven Trends Could Transform the Auto Industry (Advanced Industries). McKinsey & Co., Stuttgart, Germany.

Medina-Tapia, M. – Robusté, F. (2018): Exploring paradigm shift impacts in urban mobility: Autonomous Vehicles and Smart Cities. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 33., 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.10.093.

Menon, N. – Barbour, N. – Zhang, Y. – Pinjari, A. R. – Mannering, F. (2018): Shared autonomous vehicles and their potential impacts on household vehicle ownership: an exploratory empirical assessment. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 13(10), 1–12. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2018.1443178.

Metz, D. (2018): Developing policy for urban autonomous vehicles: Impact on congestion. Urban Science, 2(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci2020033.

Milakis, D. – Müller, S. (2021): The societal dimension of the automated vehicles transition: Towards a research agenda. Cities, Vol. 113., 103144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103144.

Milakis, D. – Snelder, M. – Van Arem, B. – Van Wee, G. P. – Homem de Almeida Correia, G. (2017): Development and transport implications of automated vehicles in the Netherlands: Scenarios for 2030 and 2050. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 17 (1), 63–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18757/ejtir.2017.17.1.3180

Miller, J. (2020): Futurama: An Immersive Experience of America's Automotive Future. Journal of Motorsport Culture – History. Vol. 1., No. 1., Article 6. Available at: https://scholars.unh.edu/jmotorsportculturehistory/vol1/iss1/ (Letöltve: 2025. március 10.)

Miskolczi M. – Ásványi K. – Jászberényi M. – Kökény L. (2021): Hogyan döntsön a mesterséges intelligencia? Az önvezető autók morális kérdései. Magyar Tudomány, 182. évf., 3. sz., 342–352. DOI: 10.1556/2065.182.2021.3.6

Miskolczi M. – Földes D. – Munkácsy A. – Jászberényi M. (2020): A mobilitási rendszer változásainak forgatókönyvei 2030-ig. In: X. Közlekedéstudományi Konferencia 2020. Győr (Tanulmánykötet). Széchenyi István Egyetem Közlekedési Tanszék; Közlekedéstudományi Egyesület, Győr.

Miskolczi M. – Munkácsy A. – Földes D. (2022): Önvezető járművek a turizmusban – technológiaelfogadás a turisták szemszögéből. Turizmus Bulletin, 22(4). 4–15. https://doi.org/10.14267/TURBULL.2022v22n4.1

Mitteregger, M. – Soteropoulos, A. – Bröthaler, J. – Dorner, F. (2019): Shared, Automated, Electric: the Fiscal Effects of the “Holy Trinity”. Proceedings of the 24th REAL CORP, International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society, Karlsruhe.

Mitteregger, M. – Bruck, E. M. – Soteropoulos, A. – Stickler, A. – Berger, M. – Dangschat, J. S. – Scheuvens, R. – Banerjee, I. (2022): Avenue 21. Connected and Automated driving: prospects for urban Europe. Springer, Berlin.

Mohammed, D. – Horváth, B. (2024): Public perception of autonomous vehicles acceptance in Hungary. International Review of Applied Sciences and Engineering, 15(3), 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1556/1848.2024.00769

Moorthy, A. – De Kleine, R. – Keoleian, G. – Good, J. – Lewis, G. (2017): Shared autonomous vehicles as a sustainable solution to the last mile problem: a case study of Ann Arbor- Detroit area. SAE Int. J. Passenger Cars Electron. Electric. Syst. 10(2), 328–336.

Moreno, A. – Michalski, A. – Llorca, C. – Moeckel, R. (2018): Shared autonomous vehicles effect on vehicle-km traveled and average trip duration. J Adv Transp. Vol. 2018., No. 1., 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8969353

Moták, L. – Neuville, E. – Chambres, P. – Marmoiton, F. – Monéger, F. – Coutarel, F. – Izaute, M. (2017): Antecedent variables of intentions to use an autonomous shuttle: moving beyond TAM and TPB? European Review of Applied Psychology, 67(5). 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2017.06.001

Muk, A. – Chung, C. (2015): Applying the technology acceptance model in a two-country study of SMS advertising. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 68., No. 1., 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.06.001.

Muraleetharan, B. – Adachi, T. – Uchida, K. – Hagiwara, T. – Kagaya, S. (2003): A Study on Evaluation of Pedestrian Level of Service along Sidewalks and at Intersections Using Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 21., 727–735. https://doi.org/10.2208/journalip.21.727

Müller, J. M. (2019): "Comparing Technology Acceptance for Autonomous Vehicles, Battery Electric Vehicles, and Car Sharing – A Study across Europe, China, and North America" Sustainability, Vol. 11., No. 16. 4333.

NACTO (2019): Blueprint for Autonomous Urbanism, second ed. National Association of City Transportation Officials. NACTO.

Nádas N. (2018): Gondolatok a térségi versenyképesség és a felelősségteljes innováció lehetséges kapcsolatáról. In: Lengyel I. (szerk.): Térségek növekedése és fejlődése: egészségipari és tudásalapú fejlesztési stratégiák. JATEPress, Szeged. 223–242.

Nádas, N. – Gonda, L. – Lukovics, M. – Udvari, B. (2017): Responsible Research and Innovation among SMEs. Icuberd book of papers 2017. University of Pécs, Pécs. 236–254.

Nádas, N. – Lukovics, M. (2022): Opportunities of responsible innovation approach in the spread of AV technology. In: Getzinger, G. – Jahrbacher, M. – Häller, F. (eds.): Critical Issues in Science, Technology‚ and Society Studies. Conference Proceedings of the STS Conference Graz 2022. TU Graz, Graz, Austria.

Nádas N. – Vas Zs. B. (2021): A felelősségteljes innováció tíz éve az Európai Unió szakpolitikájában. Közgazdasági Szemle, 68(11), 1210–1230. http://doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2021.11.1210

Nagy B. – Prónay S. – Lukovics M. (2022): Én vezessek, te vezetsz vagy önvezet? – az önvezetőjármű-elfogadás öt perszóna típusa Magyarországon. Marketing & Menedzsment, 56(2), 23–34. doi: 10.15170/MM.2022.56.02.03.

Nagy-Szijártó B. Cs. – Szalmáné Csete M. (2023): A fenntartható településfejlesztés vizsgálata a Velencei-tó térségében. Modern Geográfia, 18(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.15170/MG.2023.18.01.01

Nandi, A. – Sharma, P. (2021): Comparative study of sentiment analysis techniques. In: Interdisciplinary Research in Technology and Management. CRC Press, 456–460.

Narayanan, S. – Chaniotakis, E. – Antoniou, C. (2020): Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 111., 255–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.12.008

Naz, N. – Ehsan, M. K. – Amirzada, M. R. – Ali, M. Y. – Qureshi, M. A. (2022): Intelligence of autonomous vehicles: a concise revisit. Journal of Sensors, 2022, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2690164

Nieuwenhuijsen, J. – De Almeida Correia, G. H. – Milakis, D. – Van Arem, B. – Van Daalen, E. (2018): Towards a quantitative method to analyze the long-term innovation diffusion of automated vehicles technology using system dynamics. Transport. Res. C Emerg. Technol., Vol. 86. 300–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.11.016

Nikitas, A. – Parkinson, S. – Vallati, M. (2022): The deceitful Connected and Autonomous Vehicle: Defining the concept, contextualising its dimensions and proposing mitigation policies. Transport Policy, Vol. 122. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.04.011

Niroumand, R. – Tajalli, M. – Hajibabai, L. – Hajbabaie, A (2020): Joint optimization of vehicle-group trajectory and signal timing: Introducing the white phase for mixed-autonomy traffic stream. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 116. 102659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102659.

Nogués, S. – González-González, E. – Cordera, R. (2020): New urban planning challenges under emerging autonomous mobility: Evaluating backcasting scenarios and policies through an expert survey. Land Use Policy, Vol. 95. 104652.

Noland, R. B. – Weiner, M. D. – Gao, D. – Cook, M. P. – Nelessen, A. (2016): Eye-tracking technology, visual preference surveys, and urban design: preliminary evidence of an effective methodology. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Vol. 10., No. 1., 98–110. DOI: 10.1080/17549175.2016.1187197

Nordhoff, S. et al. (2020): Using the UTAUT2 model to explain public acceptance of conditionally automated (L3) cars: A questionnaire study among 9,118 car drivers from eight European countries. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, Vol. 74. 280–297.

Nordhoff, S. – Kyriakidis, M. – Van Arem, B. – Happee, R. (2019): A multi-level model on automated vehicle acceptance (MAVA): a review-based study. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 20(6), 682–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2019.1621406

NSW (2022): Connected and Automated Vehicles Plan. Government of New South Wales, Australia.

Okada, A. (2016): Engaging Science: innovative teaching for responsible citizenship. ENGAGE. Milton Keynes: The Open University UK.

Oldbury, K. – Isaksson, K. (2021): Governance arrangements shaping driverless shuttles in public transport: The case of Barkarbystaden, Stockholm. Cities, Vol. 113., Article 103146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103146

Oliver, N. – Potocnik, K. – Calvard, T. (2018): To make self-driving cars safe, we also need better roads and infrastructure. Harvard Business Review. Elérhető: https://hbr.org/2018/08/to-make-self-driving-cars-safe-we-also-need-better-roa ds-and-infrastructure. (Letöltve: 2021. július 1.)

OMT (2020): CAV Readiness Plan. Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Ontario.

Osakwe, Z. T. – Ikhapoh, I. – Arora, B. K. – Bubu, O. M. (2021): Identifying public concerns and reactions during the COVID-19 pandemic on Twitter: A text-mining analysis. Public Health Nur., Vol. 38., 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12843

Osswald, S. – Wurhofer, D. – Trösterer, S. – Beck, E. – Tscheligi, M. (2012): Predicting information technology usage in the car: towards a car technology acceptance model. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/2390256.2390264

Oussama, S. – Singh, I. – Pourreza, H. R. (2023): Autonomous vehicles: open-source technologies, considerations, and development. Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 03(01), 669–692. https://doi.org/10.54364/aaiml.2023.1145

Overtoom, I. – Correia, G. – Huang, Y. – Verbraeck, A. (2020): Assessing the impacts of shared autonomous vehicles on congestion and curb use: A traffic simulation study in the Hague, Netherlands. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 9(3), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2020.03.009

Owen, R. – Bessant, J. – Heintz, M. (2013b): Responsible Innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. John Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex.

Owen, R. – Macnaghten, P. – Stilgoe, J. (2012): Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 751–760.

Owen, R. – Stilgoe, J. – Macnaghten, P. – Gorman, M. – Fisher, E. – Guston, D. (2013a): A Framework for Responsible Innovation. In: Owen, R. – Bessant, J. – Heintz, M. (eds): Responsible Innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. John Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex.

Owens, J. M. – Greene-Roesel, R. – Habibovic, A. – Head L. – Apricio, A. (2018): Reducing Confict Between Vulnerable Road Users and Automated Vehicles. In: Meyer, G. – Beiker, S. (eds.): Road Vehicle Automation 4. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60934-8_7.

Ozkan, M. F. – Ma, Y. (2021): Eco-driving of connected and automated vehicle with preceding driver behavior prediction. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 143(1). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4048108

Paine, G (2019): Drones to deliver incessantbuzzing noise, and packages. The Conversation. Elérhető: https://theconversation.com/drones-to-deliver-incessant-buzzing-noise-and-packages-116257 (Letöltve: 2025. március 10.)

Palatinus, Z. – Lukovics, M. – Volosin, M. – Dudás, Zs. – Prónay, Sz. – Majó-Petri, Z. – Lengyel, H. – Szalay, Zs. (2025): Passenger physiology in self-driving vehicles during unexpected events. Sci Rep, Vol. 15., 7899. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81960-4

Palatinus, Zs. – Volosin, M. – Csábi, E. – Hallgató, E. – Hajnal, E. – Lukovics, M. – Prónay, Sz. – Ujházi, T. – Osztobányi, L. – Szabó, B. – Králik, T. – Majó-Petri, Z. (2021): Physiological Measurements in Social Acceptance of Self Driving Technologies. Scientific Reports, 12(1). DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-209603/v1

Palos Sanchez, P. R – Folgado-Fernández, J. A. – Rojas Sánchez, M. A. (2022): Virtual Reality Technology: Analysis based on text and opinion mining. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 19(8), 7856–7885. DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2022367

Palos-Sanchez, P. R. – Saura, J. R. – Correia, M. B. (2021): Do tourism applications’ quality and user experience influence its acceptance by tourists? Rev. Manag. Sci., Vol. 15., 1205–1241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00396-y

Palos-Sanchez, P. R. – Saura, J. R. – Debasa, F. (2018): The influence of social networks on the development of recruitment actions that favor user interface design and conversions in mobile applications powered by linked data. Mob. Inf. Syst., 2018(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5047017

Panagiotopoulos, I. – Dimitrakopoulos, G. (2018): An empirical investigation on consumers’ intentions towards autonomous driving. Transportation Research Part C., Vol. 95., 773–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.08.013

Pandza, K. – Ellwood, P. (2013): Strategic and ethical foundations for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(5), 1112–1125.

Park C. (2018): Using Electroencepalography and structured data collection techniques to measure passenger emotional response in human-auonomous vehicle interactions. MA, Florida Atlantic University, USA.

Páthy Á. (2019): Az autonóm járművek társadalmi elfogadottságára, illetve a technológiával kapcsolatos várakozásokra irányuló empirikus kutatási előzmények a nemzetközi szakirodalomban. Tér-Gazdaság-Ember, 7. évf., 1. sz., 87–110.

Páthy Á. (2021): Kényelem és félelem – az önvezető járművek várható előnyeinek és hátrányainak megítélése. In: Csizmadia Z. – Rechnitzer J. (szerk.): Az önvezető járművek világa. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest. DOI: 10.1556/9789634546290

Pavie, X. – Carthy, D. (2014): Addressing the Wicked Problem of Responsible Innovation Through Design Thinking. In: Buzás, N. – Lukovics, M. (eds.): Responsible Innovation. University of Szeged, Szeged, 13–27.

Pavie, X. – Carthy, D. (2015): Leveraging uncertainty: a practical approach to the integration of responsible innovation through design thinking. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 1040–1049. https://doi.org/10.1142/8903

Pavie, X. – Scholten, V. – Cathy, D. (2014): Responsible Innovation: From concept to practice. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore.

Perret, F. – Bruns, L. F. – Raymann, S. – Hofmann, R. – Fischer, C. – Abegg, P. – De Haan, R. – Straumann, S. – Deublein, M. – Willi, C. (2017): Einsatz automatisierter Fahrzeuge im Alltag – Denkbare Anwendungen und Effekte in der Schweiz. EBP, Basler Fonds, Zurich.

Pettigrew, S. – Dana, L. M. – Norman, R. (2019): Clusters of potential autonomous vehicles users according to propensity to use individual versus shared vehicles. Transport Policy, Vol. 76., 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.01.010

Phan, K. – Daim, T. – Basoglu, N. – Kargin, B. (2010): Exploring technology acceptance across countries: case of mobile services adoption in the USA and Turkey. Int. J. Services Sciences, Vol. 3., No. 2–3., 216–231.

Phillips, A. – da Schio, N. – Canters, F. – Khan, A. Z. (2023): „A living street and not just green”: Exploring public preferences and concerns regarding nature-based solution implementation in urban streetscapes. Urban Forestry – Urban Greening, Vol. 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128034.

PIARC (2021): Automated Vehicles: Challenges and Opportunities for Road Operators and Road Authorities. World Road Association (PIARC).

Porcari, A. – Borsella, E. – Mantovani, E. (2016): Responsible Industry – A Framework for implementing Responsible Research and Innovation in ICT for an ageing society. Rome: Agra. Responsible Industry Project, The European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration. Elérhető: http://www.responsible-industry.eu/ (Letöltve: 2025. március 10.)

Porreca, A. – Scozzari, F. – Di Nicola, M. (2020): Using text mining and sentiment analysis to analyze YouTube Italian videos concerning vaccination, BMC Public Health, Vol. 20., 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8342-4

Poszler, F. – Geisslinger, M. – Betz, J. – Lütge, C. (2023): Applying ethical theories to the decision-making of self-driving vehicles: A systematic review and integration of the literature. Technology in Society, Vol. 75., 102350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102350.

Prónay Sz. – Lukovics M. – Kovács P. – Majó-Petri Z. – Ujházi T. – Palatinus Zs. – Volosin M. (2022): Pánik próbája a mérés – avagy önvezető technológiák elfogadásának valós idejű vizsgálata neurotudományi mérésekkel. Vezetéstudomány, 53(7), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2022.07.05

PSC (2017): Planning for Connected and Automated Vehicles. Public Sector Consultants and Center for Automative Research, Lansing, USA.

Qorib, M. – Oladunni, T. – Denis, M. – Ososanya, E. – Cotae, P. (2023): Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy: text mining, sentiment analysis and machine learning on COVID-19 vaccination Twitter dataset. Expert Syst. Appl., Vol. 212., 118715.

Rahman, M. – Thill, J-C. (2023): Impacts of connected and autonomous vehicles on urban transportation and environment: A comprehensive review. Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 96. 104649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104649.

Rahman, M. M. – Islam, M. N. (2021): Exploring the performance of ensemble machine learning classifiers for sentiment analysis of COVID-19 tweets. In: Shakya, S. – Balas, E. V. – Kamolphiwong, S. – Du, K-L. (eds.): Sentimental Analysis and Deep Learning: Proceedings of ICSADL 2021. Springer, 383–396.

Ramsøy, T. Z. (2019): Building a foundation for neuromarketing and consumer neuroscience research: How researchers can apply academic rigor tot he neuroscientific study of advertising effects. Journal of advertising research, 59(3), 281–294.

Rane, A. – Kumar, A. (2018): Sentiment classification system of Twitter data for US airline service analysis. In: 2018 IEEE 42nd Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC). IEEE, 769–773.

Rangesh, A. – Trivedi, M. M. (2019): No blind spots: full-surround multi-object tracking for autonomous vehicles using cameras and lidars. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 4(4), 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1109/tiv.2019.2938110

Rasheed, I. (2022): Dynamic mode selection and resource allocation approach for 5G-vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication using asynchronous federated deep reinforcement learning method. Vehicular Communications, Vol. 38., 100532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vehcom.2022.100532.

Ravesteijn, W. – Liu, Y. – Yan, P. (2015): Responsible innovation in port development: the Rotterdam Maasvlakte 2 and the Dalian Dayao Bay extension projects. Water Science and Technology, 72(5), 665–677.

Ravi, B. – Kumar, M. – Hu, Y-C – Hassan, S. – Kumar, B. (2023): Stochastic modeling and performance analysis in balancing load and traffic for vehicular ad hoc networks: A review. Int. J. Netw. Managment, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/nem.2224

Rebalski, E. – Adelfio, M. – Sprei, F. – Johansson, D. J. (2022): Too much pressure? Driving and restraining forces and pressures relating to the state of connected and autonomous vehicles in cities. Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives, Vol. 13., 100507.

Richter, M. A. – Hagenmaier, M. – Bandte, O. – Parida, V. – Wincent, J. (2022): Smart cities, urban mobility and AVs: How different cities needs different sustainable investment strategies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 184., 121857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121857.

Riggs, W. – Appleyard, B. – Johnson, M. (2020): A design framework for livable streets in the era of autonomous vehicles. Urban Plan. Transport Res., 8(1), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2020.1749123

Riggs, W. – Ruhl, M. – Rodier, C. – Baumgardner, W. (2019): Designing Streets for Autonomous Vehicles. In: Meyer, G. – Beiker, S. (eds): Road Vehicle Automation 6. AVS 2018. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Springer, Cham. 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22933-7_12

Rigole, P.-J. (2014): Study of a Shared Autonomous Vehicles Based Mobility Solution in Stockholm.

Ríos-Martín, M. A. – Folgado-Fernández, J. A. – Palos-Sanchez, P. R. – Castejón-Jiménez, P. (2019): The impact of the environmental quality of online feedback and satisfaction when exploring the critical factors for Luxury Hotels. Sustainability, Vol. 12., 299. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010299

Rios-Torres, J. – Malikopoulos, A. A. (2016): A survey on the coordination of connected and automated vehicles at intersections and merging at highway on-ramps. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 18(5), 1066–1077. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2016.2600504.

Rip, A. (2005): Technology Assessment as Part of the Co-Evolution of Nanotechnology and Society: the Thrust of the TA Programme in NanoNed. Conference on Nanotechnology in Science, Economy and Society, Marburg.

Ritz, J. (2018): Mobilitätswende – autonome Autos erobern unsere Straßen. Ressourcenverbrauch, Ökonomie und Sicherheit. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20953-7-

Rogers, E. M. (2003): Diffusion of Innovations. Fifth edition. New York: Free Press.

Rojas-Rueda, D. – Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. – Khreis, Haneen – Frumkin, Howard (2020): Autonomous vehicles and public health. Annual review of public health, 41(1), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094035

Roriz, R. – Silva, H. – Dias, F. – Gomes, T. (2024). A Survey on Data Compression Techniques for Automotive LiDAR Point Clouds. Sensors, 24(10), 3185. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24103185

Roriz, R. – Cabral, J. – Gomes, T. (2021): Automotive LiDAR Technology: A Survey. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., Vol. 23., 6282–6297.

Rosell, J. – Allen, J. (2020): Test-riding the driverless bus: determinants of satisfaction and reuse intention in eight test-track locations. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. Vol. 140., 166–189.

Rouse, D. C. (2018): How to Plan for Autonomous Vehicles. In: Rouse, D. C. – Henaghan, J. – Coyner, K. – Nisenson, L. – Jordan, J. (2018): Preparing Communities for Autonomous Vehicles. American Planning Association. Chicago. 18–34.

Rustam, F. – Khalid, M. – Aslam, W. – Rupapara, V. – Mehmood, A. – Choi, G. S. (2021): A performance comparison of supervised machine learning models for Covid-19 tweets sentiment analysis. PLoS One, Vol. 16., e0245909.

SAAQ (2021): Augmentation du nombre de véhicules dans le Grand Montréal. Société de l’assurance automobile du Québec, Montreal.

SAE (2021): Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles. J3016_202104. SAE International.

Saeed, T. U. (2019): Road Infrastructure Readiness for Autonomous Vehicles. PhD Thesis, Lyles School of Civil Engineering. Purdue University.

Saeed, T. U. – Alabi, B. N. T. – Labi, S. (2020): Preparing road infrastructure to accommodate connected and automated vehicles – system-level perspective. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 1., 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)is.1943-555x.0000593

Saldaña, J. (2013): The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Second Edition. SAGE Publications, US.

Sänn, A. – Richter, S. – Fraunholz, C. K. (2017): Car-to-X als Basis organisationaler Transformation und neuer Mobilitätsdienstleistungen. Wirtschaftsinformatik – Management, 5/2017, 60–71.

Santoni de Sio, F. (2016): White paper on the Ethics of Self-driving Cars for the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment. Delft University of Technology, Delft.

Saura, J. R. – Palos-Sanchez, P. R. – Grilo, A. (2019a): Detecting indicators for startup business success: Sentiment analysis using text data mining, Sustainability, Vol. 11., 917. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030917

Saura, J. R. – Reyes-Menendez, A. – Palos-Sanchez, P. (2019b): Are Black Friday deals worth it? Mining Twitter users’ sentiment and behavior response, J. Open Innov. Tech., Market Complex., Vol. 5., 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5030058

Sávai, M. – Bodnár, G. – Mozsár, F. – Lengyel, I. – Szakálné Kanó, I. (2022): Spatial aspects of the restructuring of the Hungarian economy between 2000 and 2019. DETUROPE – The Central European. Journal of Regional Development and Tourism, 14(3), 15–33. DOI: 10.32725/det.2022.020

Schoettle, B. – Sivak, M. (2014a): A Survey of Public Opinion about Autonomous and Self-Driving Vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia. The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, U.S.A.

Schoettle, B. – Sivak, M. (2014b): Public Opinion about Self-Driving Vehicles in China, India, Japan, the US, the UK, and Australia. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Institute: Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Schreurs, M. A. – Steuwer, S. D. (2016): Autonomous Driving: Political, Legal, Social and Sustainability Dimensions. In: Maurer, M. – Gerdes, J. C. – Lenz, B. – Winner, H. (eds.): Autonomous Driving. Technical, Legal and Social Aspects. SpringerOpen, 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48847-8_8

Schuurbiers, D. (2011): What Happens in the Lab: Applying Midstream Modulation to Enhance Critical Reflection in the Laboratory. Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 17., No. 4., 769–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9317-8

Schuurbiers, D. – De Moor, K. – De Marez, L. – Evens, T. (2011): A Living Lab research approach for mobile TV. Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 28., No. 4., 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1145/1542084.1542122

Seider, C. – Schmitz, P (2017): Security-Prognosen 2018: Cyber-Si-cherheit für das vernetzte Auto. www.security-insider.de/cyber-si-cherheit-fuer-das-vernetzte-auto-a-671961 (Letöltve: 2023. február 18.)

Sen, A. (1993): Does business ethics make economic sense? Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 3., No. 1., 45–54.

Seuwou, P. – Banissi, E. – Ubakanma, G. (2020): The Future of Mobility with Connected and Autonomous Vehicles in Smart Cities. In: Farsi, M. – Daneshkhah, A. – Hosseinian-Far, A. – Jahankhani, H. (eds): Digital Twin Technologies and Smart Cities. Internet of Things. Springer, Cham. 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18732-3_3

Sheehan, B. – Murphy, F. – Mullins, M. – Ryan, C. (2019): Connected and autonomous vehicles: a cyber-risk classification framework. Transportation research part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 124., 523–536.

Shepard, E. – Napoline, K. – Douma, F. – Lari, A. (2022): Opportunities and Challenges for Deploying Connected and Automated Vehicles to Address Transportation Disparities in Urban Areas. J. L. & Mob.

Shladover, S. E. (2018): Practical Challenges to Deploying Highly Automated Vehicles. Presentation at Drive Sweden. Göteborg.

Shr, Y. H. (J.) – Ready, R. – Orland, B. – Echols, S. (2019): How do visual representations influence survey responses? Evidence from a choice experiment on landscape attributes of green infrastructure. Ecological Economics, Vol. 156., 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.10.015

Silva, D. – Földes, D. – Csiszár, C. (2021): Autonomous Vehicle Use and Urban Space Transformation: A Scenario Building and Analysing Method. Sustainability, Vol. 13., 3008. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063008

Sjafrie, H. (2019): Introduction to self-driving vehicle technology. Chapman&Hall, London.

Smahó M. (2021): Autonóm járművek a jövő városában. In: Csizmadia Z. – Rechnitzer J. (szerk.): Az önvezető járművek világa. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest. DOI: 10.1556/9789634546290

Smeds, E. – Papa, E. (2023): The value of street experiments for mobility and public life: Citizens’ perspectives from three European cities. Journal of Urban Mobility, Vol. 4., 100055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2023.100055.

SMMT (2017): Connected and Autonomous Vehicles. Revolutionising Mobility in Society. The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders, London, UK.

Smolka, M. – Böschen, S. (2023): Responsible innovation ecosystem governance: socio-technical integration research for systems-level capacity building. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2023.2207937

Sohrabi, S. – Khreis, H. – Lord, Dominique (2020): Impacts of autonomous vehicles on public health: a conceptual model and policy recommendations. Sustainable cities and society, Vol. 63., 102457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102457

Solbraa Bay, A. J. T. (2016): Innovation Adoption in Robotics: Consumer Intentions to Use Autonomous Vehicles. Master’s Thesis. Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen

Solecka, I. – Krajewski, P. – Krzyzanek, A. – Garczynska, A. (2022): Citizens’ Perceptions of Landscape Changes and Their Driving Forces: Evidence from Poland. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. Vol. 19., 1688. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031688

Southworth, M. (2005): Designing the Walkable City. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 4., 246–257. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9488(2005)131:4(246)

Sperling, D. – Van der Meer, E. – Pike, S. (2018): Vehicle Automation: Our Best Shot at a Transportation Do-Over? In: Sperling, D. (eds): Three Revolutions. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-906-7_4

Spurling, N. – McMeekin, A. (2014): Interventions in practices: Sustainable mobility policies in England. In: Strengers, Y. – Maller, C. (eds.): Social practices, intervention and sustainability. Routledge, London.

Stanek, D. – Milam, R. T. – Huang, E. – Wang, Y. (2017): Measuring autonomous vehicle impacts on congested networks using simulation. In: Proc. of Transportation Research Board, 97th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC.

Stead, D. – Vaddadi, B. (2019): Automated vehicles and how they may affect urban form: a review of recent scenario studies. Cities, Vol. 92., 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.020

Stephenson A. C. – Eimontaite I. – Caleb-S. P. – Morgan P. L. – Khatun T. – Davis J. – Alford C. (2020): Effects of an unexpected event on older adults’ autonomic arousal and eye fixation during autonomous driving. Frontiers in Psychology, Septemben, 11.

Stilgoe, J. – Owen, R. – Macnaghten, P. (2013): Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, Vol. 42., No. 9., 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008

Stilgoe, J. (2018): Machine learning, social learning and the governance of self-driving cars. Social studies of science, 48(1), 25–56.

Stilgoe, J. – Cohen, T. (2021): Rejecting acceptance: learning from public dialogue on self-driving vehicles. Science and Public Policy, 48(6), 849–859.

Storck C. R. – Duarte-Figueiredo, F. (2020): A Survey of 5G Technology Evolution, Standards, and Infrastructure Associated With Vehicle-to-Everything Communications by Internet of Vehicles. In: IEEE Access, Vol. 8., 117593–117614. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3004779

Straub, D. – Keil, M. – Brenner, W. (1997): Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study. Information – Management, Vol. 33., No. 1., 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(97)00026-8.

Straub, E. R. – Schaefer, K. E. (2019): It takes two to Tango: Automated vehicles and human beings do the dance of driving –Four social considerations for policy. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, Vol. 122., 173–183.

Su, Y-S. – Huang, H. – Daim, T. – Chien, P-W. – Peng, R-L. – Akgul, A. K. (2023): Assessing the technological trajectory of 5G-V2X autonomous driving inventions: Use of patent analysis, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 196., 122817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122817.

Sutcliffe, H. (2013): A Report on Responsible Research and Innovation. Matter, London.

Švarc, J. (2017): A socio-political approach to exploring the innovation culture in post-socialist countries: the case of Croatia. Post-Communist Economies, 29(3), 359–374. DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2017.1315001

Švarc, J. – Dabić, M. (2019): The Croatian path from socialism to European membership through the lens of technology transfer policies. J Technol Transf, Vol. 44., 1476–1504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09732-1

Szalai J. (2022): Egyenlő bánásmód az önvezető járműközlekedés szabályozásánál. Magyar Filozófiai Szemle, 66(4), 87–98.

Szalai Á. – Fabula Sz. (2021): Az okos vidékfejlesztés lehetőségei és korlátai Magyarországon. Modern Geográfia, 16(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.15170/MG.2021.16.01.04

Szántó R. – Dudás L. (2017): A döntési helyzetek tudatos tervezésének háttere. A nudge fogalma, módszerei és kritikái. Vezetéstudomány, 48. évf., 11. sz., 48–57. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2017.10.06.

Szemerédi E. (2019): Autonóm járművek – biztonság, használat és észlelt hasznosság. Tér-Gazdaság-Ember, 7. évf., 1., 111–136.

Szűcs P. – Lukovics M. – Kézy B. (2017): Új irányok a városfejlesztésben: a sétálható városok nyújtotta lehetőségek. Competitio, Vol. 2., 23–42. https://doi.org/10.21845/comp/2017/2/2

Tamilmani, K. – Rana, N. P. – Fosso Wamba, S. – Dwivedi, R. (2021): The extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2): A systematic literature review and theory evaluation. International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 57., 102269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102269.

Taohua, Z. – Yang, M. – Jiang, K. – Wong, H. – Yang, D. (2020): MMW Radar-Based Technologies in Autonomous Driving: A Review. Sensors, 20(24), 7283.

Teller, R. – Validova, A. F. (2015): Innovation Management in the Light of University-Industry Collaboration in Post-socialist Countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 24., 691–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00677-2.

Tengilimoglu, O. – Carsten, O. – Wadud, Z. (2023): Implications of automated vehicles for physical road environment: a comprehensive review. Transport. Res. E Logist. Transport. Rev., Vol. 169., 102989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2022.102989

Thakur, P. – Kinghorn, R. – Grace, Renan (2016): Urban form and function in the autonomous era. Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF), 38th.

Thomopoulos, N. – Givoni, M. (2015): The autonomous car—a blessing or a curse for the future of low carbon mobility? An exploration of likely vs. desirable outcomes. European Journal of Futures Research, 3(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-015-0071-z

Thomson, J. J. (1985): The Trolley Problem. The Yale Law Journal, 94(6), 1395–1415.

Threlfall, R. (2018): Autonomous vehicles readiness index. Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler (KPMG) International.

Tidd, J. – Bessant, J. (2009): Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. John Wiley – Sons, Ltd., Chichester.

Tihon, A. – Ingham, M. (2011): The societal system and responsible innovations: Freeing sustainable development from a deadlock. Journal of Innovation Economics, 2(8), 11–31. DOI: 10.3917/jie.008.0011

Tilt, J. H. (2010): Walking trips to parks: Exploring demographic, environmental factors, and preferences for adults with children in the household. Preventive Medicine, 50 (SUPPL.), S69–S73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.026

Tóth P. (2021): Autóhasználati preferenciák és lehetséges megoldások. In Csizmadia Z. – Rechnitzer J. (szerk.): Az önvezető járművek világa. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest. DOI: 10.1556/9789634546290

Tóth T. (2021): Az önvezető járművekkel kapcsolatos jogi felelősség = The Legal Liability of Autonomous Cars. Közlekedéstudományi Szemle: A Közlekedéstudományi Egyesület Tudományos Folyóirata, 71(4), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.24228/KTSZ.2021.4.4

Trappl, R. (2016): Ethical Systems for Self-Driving Cars: An Introduction. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 30, 745–747. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2016.1229737

TWT (2021): History of Autonomous Cars. – The noteworthy evolution of self-driving cars. Tomorrow’s World Today, New York.

Ujházi T. (2023): Önvezető járművekhez kapcsolódó fogyasztói preferenciák vizsgálata. Marketing – Menedzsment, 57(EMOK 2), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.15170/MM.2023.57.KSZ.02.07

USCB (2020): Quarterly E-Commerce Report 1st Quarter 2020. U.S. Census Bureau News. U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.

Váczi S. – Fabula Sz. – Nagy G. (2022): A big data szerepe a városi mobilitás kutatásában és fejlesztésében. Modern Geográfia, 17(4), 35–65. https://doi.org/10.15170/MG.2022.17.04.04

Vaidya, B. – Mouftah, H. T. (2021): Deploying Wireless Charging Systems for Connected and Autonomous Electric Vehicles: In: Mouftah, H. T. – Erol-Kantarci, M. – Sorour, S. (eds.): Connected and Autonomous Vehicles in Smart Cities. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429329401

Valtchanov, D. – Ellard, C. G. (2015): Cognitive and affective responses to natural scenes: Effects of low level visual properties on preference, cognitive load and eye-movements. J. Environ. Psychol. Vol. 43., 184–195.

Van Cauwenberg, J. – Van Holle, V. – De Bourdeaudhuij, I. – Clarys, P. – Nasar, J. – Salmon, J et al. (2014): Using Manipulated Photographs to Identify Features of Streetscapes That May Encourage Older Adults to Walk for Transport. PLoS ONE, 9(11), e112107. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112107

Van Cauwenberg, J. – De Bourdeaudhuij, I. – Clarys, P. et al. (2016): Street characteristics preferred for transportation walking among older adults: a choice-based conjoint analysis with manipulated photographs. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 13, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0331-8

Van den Berg, A. E. – Koole, S. L. (2006): New Wilderness in the Netherlands: An Investigation of Visual Preferences for Nature Development Landscapes. Landscape Urban Planning, Vol. 78., 362–372.

Van der Heiden, R. M. A. – Janssen, C. P. – Donker, S. F. – Hardeman, L. E. S. – Mans, K. – Kenemans, J. L. (2018): Susceptibility to audio signals during autonomous driving. PLoS ONE, 13(8), e0201963. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201963

Vasilev, M. – Pritchard, R. – Jonsson, T. (2022): Mixed-methods approach to studying multiuser perceptions of an interim Complete Streets project in Norway. Travel Behaviour and Society. Vol. 29., 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.05.002.

Vaziri, I. – Ahmadi, F. – Talebi Rizi, Z. – Saffarzadeh, M. (2024): The impact of interactions between resources, technology, and technical aspects of autonomous vehicles on urban smart spaces. International Journal of Innovation Management and Organizational Behavior, 4(2), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.ijimob.4.2.17

Veitch, J. – Salmon, J. – Deforche, B. – Ghekiere, A. – Van Cauwenberg, J. – Bangay, S. – Timperio, A. (2017): Park attributes that encourage park visitation among adolescents: A conjoint analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 161., 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.12.004.

Veitch, J. – Salmon, J. – Parker, K. – Bangay, S. – Deforche, B. – Timperio, A. (2016): Adolescents’ ratings of features of parks that encourage park visitation and physical activity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 13, 73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0391-9

Venkatesh, V. – Bala, H. (2008): Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x

Venkatesh, V. – Davis, F. D. (2000): A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

Venkatesh, V. – Thong, J. Y. L. – Xu, X. (2016): Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Synthesis and the Road Ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328–376.

Venkatesh, V. – Morris, M. G. – Davis, G. B. – Davis, F. D. (2003): User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Venkatesh, V. – Thong, J. Y. L. – Xu, X. (2012): Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412

Verhoeven, H. – Ghekiere, A. – Van Cauwenberg, J. – Van Dyck, D. – De Bourdeaudhuij, I. – Clarys, P. – Deforche, B. (2017): Which physical and social environmental factors are most important for adolescents' cycling for transport? An experimental study using manipulated photographs. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 14(1), 108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0566-z

Verma, M. – Manoj, M. – Verma, A. (2016): Analysis of the influences of attitudinal factors on car ownership decisions among urban young adults in a developing country like India Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 42 (2016), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.06.024

Vernez Moudon, A. – Lee, C. – Cheadle, A. D. – Garvin, C. – Johnson, D. – Schmid, T. L. – Weathers, R. D. – Lin, L. (2006): Operational Definitions of Walkable Neighborhood: Theoretical and Empirical Insights. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, Vol. 3., 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s99

Vida Gy. (2023): A bruttó hazai termék és a bruttó hozzáadott érték jellemzőinek területi statisztikai összefüggései az Európai Unió posztszocialista országainak régióiban. Statisztikai Szemle, 101. évf., 9. sz., 819–844. DOI: 10.20311/stat2023.09.hu0819

Von Schomberg, R. (2013): A Vision for Responsible Research and Innovation. In: Owen, R. – Bessant, J. – Heintz, M. (eds.): Responsible Innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. John Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex.

Von Schomberg, R. (2012): Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation. In: Dusseldorp, R. – Beecroft, M. (eds): Technikfolgen Abschätzen Lehren: Bildungspotenziale Transdisziplinärer. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. 39–61.

Vorm, E. S. – Combs, D. J. (2022): Integrating Transparency, Trust, and Acceptance: The Intelligent Systems Technology Acceptance Model (ISTAM). International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, Vol. 38., 1828–1845.

Wadud, Z. – MacKenzie, D. – Leiby, P. (2016): Help or hindrance? The travel, energy and carbon impacts of highly automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 86, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.12.001

Wang, J. – Shao, Y. – Ge, Y. – Yu, R. (2019): A survey of vehicle to everything (V2X) testing. Sensors, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/s19020334

Wang, N. – Tian, H. – Zhou, S. – Li, Y. (2022): Analysis of public acceptance of electric vehicle charging scheduling based on the technology acceptance model. Energy, Vol. 258., 124804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124804

Wang, X. – Wong, J. D. – Li, K. X. – Yuen, K. F. (2020): This is not me! Technology-identity concerns in consumers’ acceptance of autonomous vehicle technology. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 74., 345–360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.06.005.

Watson, D. – Clark, L. A. – Tellegen, A. (1988): Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063

WEF – BCG (2018): Reshaping Urban Mobility with Autonomous Vehicles. Lessons from the City of Boston. World Economic Forum and The Boston Consulting Group.

WEF (2020): Autonomous Vehicle Policy Framework: Selected National and Jurisdictional Policy Efforts to Guide Safe AV Development. World Economic Forum, Cologny.

Winkle, T. (2016): Development and Approval of Automated Vehicles: Considerations of Technical, Legal and Economic Risks. In: Maurer, M. – Gerdes, J. C. – Lenz, B. – Winner, H. (eds.): Autonomous Driving. Technical, Legal and Social Aspects. SpringerOpen, 589–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48847-8_28

Wu, J. – Liao, H. – Wang, J. W. – Chen, T. (2019): The role of environmental concern in the public acceptance of autonomous electric vehicles: A survey from China. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 60., 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.09.029

Wu, Y. – Zhuo, Z. – Liu, Q. – Yu, K. – Huang, Q. – Liu, J. (2021): The Relationships between Perceived Design Intensity, Preference, Restorativeness and Eye Movements in Designed Urban Green Space. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, Vol. 18., 10944. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010944

Xing, Y. – Han, X. – Zhang, H. M. – Lu, J. – Gao, Z-Y. (2022): Do bicyclists and pedestrians support their city as an autonomous vehicle proving ground? Evidence from Pittsburgh, Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(4), 2401–2412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.10.015.

Xing, Y. – Handy, S. – Circella, G. – Wang, Y. – Alemi, F. (2020): Exploring the Role of Attitude in the Acceptance of Self-driving Shuttles. University of California, Davis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7922/G2Q52MVZ

Yaghmaei, E. (2018): Responsible research and innovation key performance indicators in industry. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 16(2), 214–234. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-11-2017-0066

Yan, C. – Xu, W. – Liu, J. (2016): Can You Trust Autonomous Vehicles: Contactless Attacks Against Sensors of Self-driving Vehicle. DEF CON 24 Conference, Las Vegas, NV.

Yeomans, G. (2014): Autonomous Vehicles. Handing Over Control: Opportunities and Risks for Insurance. Lloyd’s, London, UK.

Yeong, D. J. – Velasco-Hernandez, G. – Barry, J. – Walsh, J. (2021): Sensor and Sensor Fusion Technology in Autonomous Vehicles: A Review. Sensors, 21(6), 2140. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21062140

Yigitcanlar, T. – Wilson, M. – Kamruzzaman, M. (2019): Disruptive impacts of automated driving systems on the built environment and land use: an urban planner’s perspective. J. Open Innov.: Technol. Market Complex., 5(2), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5020024

Young, F. W. (1969): Polynomial Conjoint Analysis of Similarities: A Model for Constructing Polynomial Conjoint Measurement Algorithms. North Carolina University. USA

Yuen, Kum F. – Huyen, Do T. K. – Wang, X. – Qi, G. (2020): Factors Influencing the Adoption of Shared Autonomous Vehicles. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, Vol. 17, No. 13., 4868. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134868

Zali, N. – Amiri, S. – Yigitcanlar, T. – Soltani, A. (2022): Autonomous Vehicle Adoption in Developing Countries: Futurist Insights. Energies, Vol. 15., 8464. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228464

Zandieh, R. – Acheampong, R. A. (2021): Mobility and healthy ageing in the city: Exploring opportunities and challenges of autonomous vehicles for older adults' outdoor mobility. Cities, Vol. 112., Article 103135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103135

Zardini, G. – Lanzetti, N. – Pavone, M. – Frazzoli, E. (2022): Analysis and Control of Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systems. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, 5(1), 633–658. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-control-042920-012811

Zhang, H. – Song, X. – Xia, T. – Zheng, J. – Haung, D. – Shibasaki, R. – Yan, Y. – Liang, Y. (2018): MaaS in Bike-Sharing: Smart Phone GPS Data Based Layout Optimization and Emission Reduction Potential Analysis. Energy Procedia, Vol. 152., 649–654.

Zhang, S. – Jing, P. – Xu, G. (2021): The Acceptance of Independent Autonomous Vehicles and Cooperative Vehicle-Highway Autonomous Vehicles. Information, 12(9), 346. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12090346

Zhang, T. – Tao, D. – Qu, X. – Zhang, X. – Zeng, J. – Zhu, H. – Zhu, H. (2020): Automated vehicle acceptance in China: Social inﬂuence and initial trust are key determinants. Transportation Research, Part C Emerging Technologies, Vol. 112., 220–233.

Zhang, T. – Tao, D. – Qu, X. – Zhang, X. – Lin, R. – Zhang, W. (2019): The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. Vol. 98., 207–220.

Zhang, W. – Guhathakurta S. (2017): Parking spaces in the age of shared autonomous vehicles: how much parking will we need and where? Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, Vol. 2651., No. 1., 80–91.

Zhao, J. – Hu, Y. – Muldoon, S. – Chang, C.-F. (2019): „InfoRich”: Eco-driving control strategy for connected and automated vehicles. 2019 American Control Conference (ACC). IEEE, 4621–4627. https://doi.org/10.23919/acc.2019.8814727

Zhao, Y. – Kockelman, K. M. (2018): Anticipating the regional impacts of connected and automated vehicle travel in Austin, Texas. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 144(4), 04018032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000463.

Zheng, B. – Zhang, Y. – Chen, J. (2011): Preference to Home Landscape: Wildness or Neatness? Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 99., 1–8.

Zhou, M. – Le, D. – Nguyen-Phuoc, D. Q. – Zegras, P. C. – Ferreira, J. J. (2021): Simulating impacts of Automated Mobility-on-Demand on accessibility and residential relocation. Cities, Vol. 118., 103345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103345.

Zhou, Y. – Xu, M. (2023): Robotaxi service: The transition and governance investigation in China. Research in Transportation Economics, Vol. 100., 101326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101326.

Zomarev A. – Rozhenko M. (2020): Impact of Self-driving Cars for Urban Development. Foresight and STI Governance, Vol. 14., No 1., 70–84. DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2020.1.70.84

Zuti B. – Lukovics M. (2023): Az önvezető járművek elfogadása viselkedés-gazdaságtani szemléletben. A nudge szerepe a fenntartható városi mobilitás kialakításában. Közgazdasági Szemle, 60(február), 149–166. DOI:10.18414/KSZ.2023.2.149.

Az önvezető járművek és a városi társadalom

Tartalomjegyzék

Kiadó: Akadémiai Kiadó

Online megjelenés éve: 2025

ISBN: 978 963 664 154 2

Gazdaság

Az önvezető járművek elterjedése új kihívások elé állítja a városokat. A technológia ígéretes, de a sikeres integráció nemcsak műszaki kérdés: kulcsszerep jut a városi döntéshozóknak és az érintett közösségeknek is. E monográfia a felelősségteljes innováció szemléletében vizsgálja, hogyan készülhetnek fel a városok az önvezető járművek érkezésére. Interdiszciplináris kutatásra építve mutatja be a városi lakosság és az önkormányzatok attitűdjeit, kockázatérzékelését és elvárásait. A kötet nem csupán a jelenlegi állapotot tárja fel, hanem gyakorlati keretrendszert is kínál a városi önvezetőjármű-felkészültség növelésére. Hasznos olvasmány kutatók, szakpolitikusok, városfejlesztők és mindazok számára, akik tenni szeretnének a technológiai átmenet társadalmilag elfogadott és sikeres megvalósításáért.

Hivatkozás: https://mersz.hu/lukovics-az-onvezeto-jarmuvek-es-a-varosi-tarsadalom//

BibTeX EndNote Mendeley Zotero