Hivatkozások
Aitchison J. 1987. Words in the mind. An introduction to the mental lexicon. Oxford: Blackwell.
Alegre M., P. Gordon 1999. Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language 40: 41–61.
Allen M., W. Badecker 2002. Inflectional regularity: Probing the nature of lexical representation in a cross-modal priming task. Journal of Memory and Language 46: 705–724.
Baayen R. H., T. Dijkstra, R. Schreuder 1997. Singulars and plurals in Dutch. Evidence for a dual parallel route model. Journal of Memory and Language 37: 94–119.
Balota D. A., J. I. Chumbley 1984. Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10: 340–357.
Balota D. A., M. Pilotti, M. J. Cortese 2001. Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words. Memory and Cognition 29: 639–647.
Barr R. –
M. L. Kamil –
P. Mosenthal –
P. D. Pearson (szerk.) 1991. Handbook of reading research. New York: Longman.
Barry C., K. W. Hirsh, R. A. Johnston, C. L. Williams 2001. Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the locus of repetition priming of picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language 44: 350–375.
Bates E., S. D’Amico, T. Jacobsen, A. Székely, E. Andonova, A. Devescovi, D. Herron, C. Ching Lu, T. Pechmann, Cs. Pléh, N. Wicha, K. Federmeier, I. Gerdjikova, G. Gutierrez, D. Hung, J. Hsu, G. Iyer, K. Kohnert, T. Mehotcheva, A. Orozco-Figueroa, A. Tzeng, O. Tzeng 2003. Timed picture naming in seven languages. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 10: 344–380.
Benki J. R. 2003. Quantitative evaluation of lexical status, word frequency, and neighborhood density as context effects in spoken word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 113: 1691–1705.
Beretta A., C. Campbell, T. H. Carr, J. Huang, L. M. Schmitt, K. Christianson, Y. Cao 2003. An ER-fMRI investigation of morphological inflection in German reveals that the brain makes a distinction between regular and irregular forms. Brain and Language 85: 67–92.
Bertram R., M. Laine, K. Karvinen 1999. The interplay of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity in lexical processing: Evidence from a morphologically rich language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28: 213–226.
Bertram R., R. Schreuder, R. H. Baayen 2000. The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26: 489–511.
Bleasdale F. A. 1987. Concreteness dependent associative priming: Separate lexical organization for concrete and abstract words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 13: 582–594.
Bonin P., A. Meot, L. Aubert, N. Malardier, P. Niedenthal, M. C. Capelle-Toczek 2003. Concreteness, imageability, subjective frequency and emotionality ratings for 866 words. Année Psychologique 103: 655–694.
Bowles R. P., J. G. Kevin, J. J. McArdle 2005. A structural factor analysis of vocabulary knowledge and relations to age. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 60: 234–241.
Brown G. D. A. – F. L. Watson 1987. First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency. Memory and Cognition 15: 208–216.
Brown R., D. McNeill 1966. The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 5: 325–337.
Butterworth B. 1983. Lexical representation. In: B. Butterworth (szerk.): Language production, Volume 2. London: Academic Press. 257–294.
Bybee J. L. 2000. The phonology of the lexicon: Evidence from lexical diffusion. In: M. Barlow –
S. Kemmer (szerk.): Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 65–85.
Bybee J. L. 2001. Phonology and language use (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 94). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee J. L., C. L. Moder 1983. Morphological classes as natural categories. Language 59: 251–270.
Bybee J. L., D. I. Slobin 1982. Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language 58: 265–289.
Caramazza A., A. Laudanna, C. Romani 1988. Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition 28: 297–332.
Carlesimo G. A., P. Turriziani, E. Paulesu, A. Gorini, C. Caltagirone, F. Fazio, D. Perani 2003. Brain activity during intra- and cross-modal priming: New empirical data and review of the literature. Neuropsychologia 42: 14–24.
Carroll J. B. 1964. Language and thought. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.
Carroll J. B. 1971. Measurement properties of subjective magnitude estimates of word frequency. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 10: 722–729.
Carroll J. B., M. N. White 1973a. Age of acquisition norms for 220 pictureable nouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12: 563–576.
Carroll J. B., M. N. White 1973b. Word frequency and age of acquisition as determiners of picture-naming latency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 25: 85–95.
Clahsen H. 1992. Overregularization in the acquisition of inflectional morphology: A comparison of English and German. Commentary. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 57: 166–178.
Clahsen H. 1999. Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 991–1013.
Cone N. E., D. D. Burman, T. Bitan, D. J. Bolger, J. R. Booth 2008. Developmental changes in brain regions involved in phonological and orthographic processing during spoken language processing. NeuroImage 41: 623–635.
Cotton S., F. Grosjean 1984. The gating paradigm: A comparison of successive and individual presentation formats. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 35: 41–48.
Czigler I., Pléh Cs. 1973. Mediáció és jelentés. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle 30: 88–108.
Dankovics N., Pléh Cs. 2001. Hangrestaurációs jelenségek és alaktani feldolgozás a magyarban: Azt halljuk-e, amit várunk? In: Pléh –
Lukács (2001, 55–81).
D’Anna C. A., E. B. Zechmeister, J. W. Hall 1991. Toward a meaningful definition of vocabulary size. Journal of Literacy Research 23: 109–122.
Deacon D., T.-J. Uhm, W. Ritter, S. Hewitt, A. Dynowska 1999. The lifetime of automatic semantic priming effects may exceed two seconds. Cognitive Brain Research 7: 465–474.
Deese J. E. 1965. The structure of associations in language and thought. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Desrochers A., M. Bergeron 2000. Norms of subjective frequency of use and imagery for a sample of 1,916 French nouns. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology (Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale) 54: 274–325.
Duffy S. A., R. K. Morris, K. Rayner 1988. Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language 27: 429–446.
Durante R., E. Hirshman 1994. Retrospective priming and masked semantic priming: The interfering effects of prime activation. Journal of Memory and Language 33: 112–127.
Ebbinghaus H. 1885.
Über das Gedäcthnis.
Angol on-line változata: On memory.
link.
Ellis A. W., C. M. Morrison 1998. Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 24: 515–523.
Ellis A. W., A. Young 1988. Human cognitive neuropsychology. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fay D., A. Cutler 1977. Malapropism and the structure of the mental lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 505–520.
Fekete I. 2007. Főnévi fogalmak konkrétsági, elképzelhetőségi és definiálhatósági értékeinek összefüggései. Előadás kézirata.
Feldman L. B. (szerk.) 1995. Morphological aspects of language processing. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fenson L., P. Dale, S. J. Reznick, E. Bates, D. Thal, S. Pethick 1994. Variability in early communicative development (Monographs of The Society for Research in Child Development 59 (5, 242)). San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.
Ferrand L., P. Bonin, A. Méot, M. Augustinova, B. New, C. Pallier, M. Brysbaert 2008. Age-of-acquisition and subjective frequency estimates for all generally known monosyllabic French words and their relation with other psycholinguistic variables. Behavior Research Methods 40: 1049–1054.
Fidelholtz J. L. 1975. Word frequency and vowel reduction in English. Chicago Linguistic Society 11: 200–213.
Fischler I. 1977. Semantic facilitation without association in a lexical decision task. Memory and Cognition 5: 335–339.
Flieller A., J. Tournois 1994. Imagery value, subjective and objective frequency, date of entry into the language, and degree of polysemy in a sample of 998 French words. International Journal of Psychology 29: 471–509.
Fodor J. A. 1983. The modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Ford M., W. D. Marslen, Wilson M. H. D. M. 2003. Morphology and frequency: Contrasting methodologies. In: R. H. Baayen –
R. Schreuder (szerk.): Morphological structure in language processing. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 89–122.
Forster K. I. 1998. The pros and cons of masked priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27: 203–233.
Forster K. I. 1999. The microgenesis of priming effects in lexical access. Brain and Language 68: 5–15.
Forster K. I., C. G. Chambers 1973. Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12: 627–635.
Frost R., A. Deutsch, O. Gilboa, M. Tannenbaum, W. Marslen-Wilson 2000. Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory and Cognition 28: 1277–1288.
Füredi M., Kelemen J. 1989. A mai magyar nyelv szépprózai gyakorisági szótára (1965—1977). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Gergely G., Cs. Pléh 1994. Lexical processing in an agglutinative language and the organization of the lexicon. Folia Linguistica 28: 175–204.
Gergely G., Pléh Cs. 1995. Alaktani kétértelműségekés a morfológiai feldolgozás a magyarban. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle 51: 1–27.
Gernsbacher M. A. 1993. Less skilled readers have less efficient suppression mechanisms. Psychological Science 4: 294–298.
Gibson K. 1991. Continuity versus discontinuity theories of the evolution of human and animal minds (Comment on Greenfield P. M., Language, tools and brain: The ontogeny and phylogeny of hierarchially organised sequential behavior). Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14: 560–561.
Gomes H., W. Ritter, V. C. Tartter, H. G. Vaughan, J. J. Rosen 1997. Lexical processing of visually and auditorily presented nouns and verbs: Evidence from reaction time and n400 priming data. Cognitive Brain Research 6: 121–134.
Gough P. B. 1991. The complexity of reading. In: R. R. Hoffman –
D. S. Palermo (szerk.): Cognition and the symbolic processes: Applied and ecological perspectives. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum. 141–149.
Greenfield P. M. 2009. Technology and informal education: What is taught, what is learned. Science 328: 68–71.
Gregory M. L., W. D. Raymond, A. Bell, E. Fosler-Lussier, D. Dan Jurafsky 1999. The effects of collocational strength and contextual predictability in lexical production. CLS 99: 151–166.
de Groot A. M. B. 1989. Representational aspects of word imageability and word frequency as assessed through word association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15: 824–845.
Grosjean F. 1980. Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics 28: 267–283.
Grosjean F. 1996. Gating. Language and Cognitive Processes 11: 597–604.
Gunter T. C., S. Wagner, A. D. Friederici 2003. Working memory and lexical ambiguity resolution as revealed by ERPs: A difficult case for activation theories. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15: 643–657.
Halácsy P., A. Kornai, L. Németh, A. Rung, I. Szakadát, V. Trón 2004. Creating open language resources for Hungarian. In: M. T. Lino –
M. F. Xavier –
F. Ferreira –
R. Costa –
R. Silva (szerk.): Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC2004) 2004. Paris: European Language Resource Association. 203–210.
Halle M., K. P. Mohanan 1985. Segmental phonology of Modern English. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 57–116.
Hart J., A. Cohen 1964. Gating technique as an aid in speech analysis. Language and Speech 7: 22–39.
Henson R. N. A. 2003. Neuroimaging studies of priming. Progress in Neurobiology 70: 53–81.
Hess C. W., K. P. Ritchie, L. R. G. 1984. The type-token ratio and vocabulary performance. Psychological Reports 55: 51–57.
Hogaboam T. W., C. A. Perfetti 1975. Lexical ambiguity and sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14: 265–274.
Hooper J. B. 1976. An introduction to natural generative phonology. New York: Academic Press.
Howes D. H. 1957. On the relation between the intelligibility and frequency of occurrence of English words. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 29: 296–305.
Howes D. H., R. L. Solomon 1951. Visual duration threshold a a function of word-probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology 41: 401–410.
James C. T. 1975. The role of semantic information in lexical decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1: 130–136.
Järvikivi J., J. Niemi 2002. Form-based representation in the mental lexicon: Priming (with) bound stem allomorphs in Finnish. Brain and Language 81: 412–423.
Jescheniak J. D., W. J. M. Levelt 1994. Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 20: 824–843.
de Jong N. H., R. Schreuder, R. H. Baayen 2000. The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes 15: 329–365.
Juhász L. Z. 1995. Morfológiailag komplex szavak feldolgozása. In: Pléh Cs. –
Vinkler Zs. –
Bocz A. (szerk.): FIKOG (I. FIKOG konferencia anyaga). Budapest: ELTE. 20–50.
Juhász L. Z., Pléh Cs. 2001. Többmorfémás szavak megértése a magyarban. In: Pléh –
Lukács (2001, 11–38).
Jurafsky D. 1992. An on-line computational model of human sentence interpretation: A theory of the representation and use of linguistic knowledge. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Jurafsky D. 1996. A probabilistic model of lexical and syntactic access and disambiguation. Cognitive Science 20: 137–194.
Jurafsky D., A. Bell, C. Girand 2002. The role of the lemma in form variation. Laboratory Phonology 7: 3–34.
Jurafsky D., A. Bell, M. Gregory, W. D. Raymond 2001. The effect of language model probability on pronunciation reduction. In: Proceedings of ICASSP-01 II., Salt Lake City, Utah. 801–804.
Kawamoto A. H. 1993. Nonlinear dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity: A parallel distributed processing account. Journal of Memory and Language 32: 474–516.
Kellas G., S. T. Paul, M. Martin, G. B. Simpson 1991. Contextual feature activation and meaning access. In: G. B. Simpson (szerk.): Understanding word and sentence. Amsterdam: North-Holland. 47–70.
Kempley S., J. Morton 1982. The effects of priming with regularly and irregularly related words in auditory word recognition. British Journal of Psychology 73: 441–454.
Kiefer F. 1998. Alaktan. In: É. Kiss K. – Kiefer F. – Siptár P.: Új magyar nyelvtan. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó. 187–290.
Kiefer F. (szerk.) 2000. Strukturális magyar nyelvtan 3. Morfológia. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Kiefer F. (szerk.) 2008. Strukturális magyar nyelvtan 4. A szótár szerkezete. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Kiger J. I., A. L. Glass 1983. The facilitation of lexical decisions by a prime occuring after the target. Memory and Cognition 11: 356–365.
Koriat A. 1981. Semantic facilitation in lexical decision as a function of prime-target association. Memory and Cognition 9: 587–598.
Kornai A. 1992. Frequency in morphology. In: I. KeneseiCs. Pléh (szerk.): Approaches to Hungarian 4: The structure of Hungarian. Szeged: JATE. 247–268.
Kornai A. 1994. On Hungarian morphology (Linguistica, Series A: Studia et Dissertationes 14). Budapest: Linguistics Institute of Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
Kornai A., P. Halácsy, V. Nagy, Cs. Oravecz, V. Trón, D. Varga 2006.
Web-based frequency dictionaries for medium density languages. In:
A. Kilgarriff –
M. Baroni (szerk.):
Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Web as Corpus. Trento: Association for Computational Linguistics. ACL–06: 1–9.
link
Kostić A. 1995. Information load constraints on processing inflected morphology. In: Feldman (1995, 317–344).
Kroll J. F., J. S. Merves 1986. Lexical access for concrete and abstract words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 12: 92–107.
Lachman R., J. P. Shaffer, D. Hennrikus 1974. Language and cognition: Effects of stimulus codability, name-word frequency, and age of acquisition on lexical reaction time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13: 613–625.
Laine M., J. Niemi, P. Koivuselkä-Sallinen, J. Hyönä 1995. Morphological processing of polymorphemic nouns in a highly inflecting language. Cognitive Neuropsychology 12: 457–502.
Laudanna A., C. Burani 1995. Distributional properties of derivational affixes: Implications for processing. In: Feldman (1995, 345–364).
Laufer B., P. Nation 1999. A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing 16: 33–51.
Lukács Á. 2001. Szabályok és kivételek: a kettős modell érvényessége a magyarban. In: Pléh –
Lukács (2001, 119–152).
Lukács Á. 2008. Nyelvtani feldolgozás. In: Csépe V. –
Győri M. –
Ragó A. (szerk.): Általános pszichológia 3. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó. 116–155.
Lukács Á., Cs. Pléh 1999. Hungarian cross-modal priming and treatment of nonsense words supports the dual-process hypothesis (Commentary on “Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection” by Harald Clahsen). Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 1030–1031.
Lukács Á., Pléh Cs. 2003. A nyelv idegrendszeri reprezentációja. In: Pléh Cs. –
Kovács G. –
Gulyás B. (szerk.): Kognitív idegtudomány. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó. 528–560.
Lukatela G., C. Carello, M. T. Turvey 1987. Lexical representation of regular and irregular inflected nouns. Language and Cognitve Processes 2: 59–63.
Lüdeling A., N. H. de Jong 2002. German particle verbs and word-formation. In: N. Dehé –
R. Jackendoff –
A. McIntyre –
S. Urban (szerk.): Verb-particle explorations. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 315–333.
MacKay D. G. 1976. On the retrieval and lexical structure of verbs. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 15: 169–182.
Magyari L. 2004. A szemantikai áttetszőség hatása a mentális lexikon szerveződésében. Tudomány és Lélek 10: 93–112.
Magyari L. 2005. A morfológiai feldolgozás kísérleti vizsgálata: A képzett szavak szerveződése a mentális lexikonban. Szakdolgozat, ELTE PPK Pszichológia szak.
Marcus G., U. Brinkmann, H. Clahsen, R. Wiese, S. Pinker 1995. German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology 29: 189–256.
Marslen-Wilson W. D. 1975. Sentence perception as an interactive parallel process. Science 189: 226–228.
Marslen-Wilson W. D. 1990. Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In: G. T. M. Altmann (szerk.): Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistics and computational perspectives. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. 148–172.
Marslen-Wilson W. D., L. K. Tyler 1980. The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition 8: 1–71.
Marslen-Wilson W. D., L. K. Tyler 1997. Dissociating types of mental computation. Nature 387: 592–594.
Marslen-Wilson W. D., L. K. Tyler, R. Waksler, L. Older 1994. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review 101: 3–33.
Marton L. M. (szerk.) 1975. A tanulás szerepe az emberi észlelésben. Budapest: Gondolat.
McClelland J. L., J. L. Elman 1986. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 18: 1–86.
Meunier F., C.-M. Longtin 2007. Morphological decomposition and semantic integration in word processing. Journal of Memory and Language 56: 457–471.
Meyer D., R. Schaneveldt 1971. Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology 90: 227–234.
Miller G. A. 1951. Language and communication. New York: McGraw Hill.
Miller G. A., G. A. Heise, W. Lichten 1951. The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology 41: 329–335.
Miyake A. A., M. A. Just, P. A. Carpenter 1994. Working memory constraints on the resolution of lexical ambiguity: Maintaining multiple interpretations in neutral contexts. Journal of Memory and Language 33: 175–202.
Morrison C. M., A. W. Ellis, P. T. Quinlan 1992. Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition. Memory and Cognition 20: 705–714.
Morton J. 1969. The interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review 76: 165–178.
Morton J. 1979. Facilitation in word recognition: Experiments causing change in the logogen models. In: P. A. Kolers –
M. E. Wrolstad –
H. Bouma (szerk.): Processing of visible language 1. New York: Plenum. 259–268.
Moscoso del Prado Martín F. 2003. Paradigmatic effects in morphological processing: Computational and cross-linguistic experimental studies. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Moscoso del Prado Martín F., A. Kostić, H. R. Baayen 2004. Putting the bits together: An informatical theoretical perspective on morphological processing. Cognition 94: 1–18.
Nation I. S. P. 1990. Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.
Neill W. T., D. V. Hilliard, E. A. Cooper 1988. The detection of lexical ambiguity: Evidence for context-sensitive parallel access. Journal of Memory and Language 27: 279–287.
Neisser U. 1967. Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton.
Newman A. J., M. T. Ullman, R. Pancheva, D. L. Waligura, H. J. Neville 2007. An ERP study of regular and irregular English past tense inflection. Neuroimage 34: 435–445.
Niemi J., M. Laine, P. Koivuselkä-Sallinen 1994a. Mental morphology and the Finnish verb: Aphasiological and normal data. Brain and Language 47: 509–511.
Niemi J., M. Laine, J. Tuominen 1994b. Cognitive morphology in Finnish: Foundations of a new model. Language and Cognitive Processes 9: 423–446.
Noble C. E. 1952. An analysis of meaning. Psychological Review 59: 421–430.
Noble C. E. 1963. Meaningfulness and familiarity. In: C. N. Cofer –
B. S. Musgrave (szerk.): Verbal behavior and learning: Problems and processes. New York: McGraw-Hill. 76–157.
Oldfield R. C., A. Wingfield 1965. Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 17: 273–281.
O’Loughlin M. 1995. Daring the imagination: Unlocking voices of dissent and possibility in teaching. Theory into practic 34: 107–116.
Onifer W., D. A. Swinney 1981. Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias. Memory and Cognition 9: 225–236.
Osgood C. E., W. H. May, M. S. Miron 1975. Cross-cultural universals of affectire meaning. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.
Osgood C. E., G. J. Suci, P. H. Tannenbaum 1957. The measurement of meaning. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.
Paivio A. 1965. Abstractness, imagery, and meaningfulness in paired-associate learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 4: 32–38.
Paivio A. 1971. Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt.
Paivio A. 1991. Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie 45: 255–287.
Paivio A. 2006. Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Pastizzo M. J., L. B. Feldman 2002. Discrepancies between orthographic and unrelated baselines in masked priming undermine a decompositional account of morphological facilitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28: 244–249.
Pastizzo M. J., L. B. Feldman 2004. Morphological processing: A comparison between free and bound stem facilitation. Brain and Language 90: 31–39.
Paul S. T., G. Kellas, M. Martin, M. B. Clark 1992. Influence of contextual features on the activation of ambiguous word meanings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18: 703–717.
Petersen S. E., P. T. Fox, M. I. Posner, M. A. Mintun, M. E. Raichle 1989. Positron emission tomographic studies of the processing of single words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1: 153–170.
van Petten C., M. Kutas 1987. Ambiguous words in context: An event-related potential analysis of the time course of meaning activation. Journal of Memory and Language 26: 188–208.
Pinker S. 1991. Rules of language. Science 253: 530–535.
Pinker S. 1999. A nyelvi ösztön. Budapest: TypoTEX Kiadó.
Pinker S., A. Prince 1994. Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammar. In: S. D. Lima –
R. L. Corrigan –
G. K. Iverson (szerk.): The reality of linguistic rules. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 321–351.
Pinker S., M. T. Ullman 2002. The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6: 456–463.
Pisoni D. B., H. C. Nusbaum, P. A. Luce, L. M. Slowiaczek 1985. Speech perception, word recognition and the structure of the lexicon. Speech Communication 4: 75–95.
Pléh Cs. 2000a. A magyar morfológia pszicholingvisztikai aspektusai. In: Kiefer (2000, 951–1020).
Pléh Cs. 2000b. Moduláris és interakciós felfogások a nyelvfeldolgozásban. In: Pléh Cs. –
Kampis G. –
Csányi V. (szerk.): A megismeréskutatás útjai. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 207–248.
Pléh Cs. 2006. A megértés folyamatának pszicholingvisztikai elemzése. In: Kovács I. –
Szamarasz V. (szerk.): Látás, nyelv, emlékezet. Budapest: TypoTEX. 75–91.
Pléh Cs. 2010. A lélektan története (2. kiadás). Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.
Pléh Cs. 2011. A tudatos és a nem tudatos problémája a kísérleti pszichológia és a kognitív tudomány tükrében. Magyar Pszcihológiai Szemle 66: 47–74.
Pléh Cs., Czigler I. 1979. Kísérlet politikai kifejezések megítélésére alkalmas szemantikus differenciál skálák kidolgozására és alkalmazására. In: Hunyadi Gy. (szerk.): Pszichológiai Tanulmányok 15. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 479–533.
Pléh Cs., L. Z. Juhász 1995. Processing multimorphemic words in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 36: 241–267.
Pléh Cs. –
Lukács Á. (szerk.) 2001. A magyar morfológia pszicholingvisztikája. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.
Pléh Cs., Lukács Á., Kas B. 2008. A szótár pszicholingvisztikája. In: Kiefer (2008, 789–852).
Pléh Cs., K. Németh, D. Varga, J. Fazekas, K. Várhelyi 2013. Entropy measures and predictive recognition as mirrored in gating and lexical decision over multimorphemic Hungarian noun forms. Psihologija 46: 395–418.
Prasada S., S. Pinker, W. Snyder 1990. Some evidence that irregular forms are retrieved from memory but regular forms are rule-governed. Paper presented at the Thirty First Meeting of the Psychonomic Society. New Orleans, November 1990.
Putnoky J. 1975. Szavak mozgáskiváltó hatásának mérése osztályozási eljárással. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle 32: 383–385.
Putnoky J. 1978. A „motoritás” a szójelentés három főbb működési körében. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle 35: 203–213.
Putnoky J. 1979. “Motority” in three functional domains of word meaning. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 8: 543–558.
Raveh M. 2002. The contribution of frequency and semantic similarity to morphological processing. Brain and Language 81: 312–325.
Rayner K., L. Frazier 1989. Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15: 779–790.
Rayner K., R. K. Morris 1991. Comprehension processes in reading ambiguous sentences: Reflections from eye movements. Understanding Sord and Sentence 77: 175–198.
Rebrus P. 2000. Morfofonológiai jelenségek. In: Kiefer (2000, 763–947).
Rebrus P., P. Halácsy, P. Vajda 2006. Frequency effects in word recognition. Előadás a II. Kognitív Tudományi Kongresszuson, Szentpétervár, 2006. június 9.
Rebrus P., Törkenczy M. 2008. Morfofonológia és a lexikon. In: Kiefer (2008, 683–786).
Rubenstein H., L. Garfield, J. A. Millikan 1970. Homographic entries in the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 9: 487–494.
Rumelhart D. E., J. L. McClelland 1982. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception. II. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review 89: 60–94.
Rumelhart D. E., J. L. McClelland 1986. On learning the past tense of English verbs. In: R. McClelland (szerk.): Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. 217–271.
Samuel A. G. 1981. Phonemic restauration: Insights from a new methodology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 110: 474–494.
Samuel A. G. 1997. Lexical activation produces potent phonemic percepts. Cognitive Psychology 32: 97–127.
Savin H. B. 1963. Word-frequency effect and errors in the perception of speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 35: 200–206.
Schreuder R., R. H. Baayen 1995. Modeling morphological processing. In: Feldman (1995, 131–154).
Schreuder R., R. H. Baayen 1997. How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language 37: 118–139.
Schvaneveldt R. W., D. E. Meyer, C. A. Becker 1976. Lexical ambiguity, semantic context, and visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2: 243–256.
Schwanenflugel P. J., K. L. LaCount 1988. Semantic relatedness and the scope of facilitation for upcoming words in sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14: 344–354.
Schwanenflugel P. J., E. J. Shoben 1985. The influence of sentence constraint on the scope of facilitation for upcoming words. Journal of Memory and Language 24: 232–252.
Seidenberg M. S., M. K. Tanenhaus, J. M. Leiman, M. Bienkowski 1982. Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing. Cognitive Psychology 14: 489–537.
Seidenberg M. S., G. S. Waters, M. Sanders, P. Langer 1984. Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition. Memory and Cognition 12: 315–328.
Shallice T., P. MacLeod, K. Lewis 1985. Isolating cognitive modules with the dual task paradigm: Are speech perception and production separate processes? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 37A: 507–532.
Simpson G. B. 1994. Context and the processing of ambiguous words. In: M. A. Gernsbacher (szerk.): Handbook of psycholinguistics. San Diego: Academic Press. 359–374.
Simpson G. B., C. Burgess 1985. Activation and selection processes in the recognition of ambiguous words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 11: 28–39.
Smolka E., P. Zwitserlood, F. Rösler 2007. Stem access in regular and irregular inflection: Evidence from German participles. Journal of Memory and Language 57: 325–347.
Sonnenstuhl I., S. Eisenbeiss, H. Clahsen 1999. Morphological priming in the German mental lexicon. Cognition 72: 203–236.
Stadthagen-Gonzalez H., C. J. Davis 2006. The bristol norms for age of acquisition, imageability, and familiarity. Behavior Research Methods 38: 598–605.
Stanners R. F., G. B. Forbach 1973. Analysis of letter strings in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology 98: 31–35.
Stanners R. F., J. J. Neiser, W. P. Hernon, R. Hall 1979. Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 399–412.
Stanovich K. E., R. F. West 1983. On priming by a sentence context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 112: 1–36.
Stemberger J., B. MacWhinney 1986. Form-oriented errors in language processing. Cognitive Psychology 14: 17–26.
Strain E., K. Patterson, M. S. Seidenberg 1995. Semantic effects in single-word naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21: 1140–1154.
Swaab T., C. Brown, P. Hagoort 2003. Understanding words in sentence contexts: The time course of ambiguity resolution. Brain and Language 86: 326–343.
Swinney D. A. 1979. Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 645–659.
Székely A. 2002. Reakcióidő változók vizsgálata nem hagyományos statisztikai módszerekkel. Szakdolgozat, ELTE, Budapest.
Székely A. 2003. Lexikális előhívás interkulturális kutatása képmegnevezési helyzetben. Doktori értekezés, ELTE, Budapest.
Tabossi P. 1987. Context type determines whether lexical access is exhaustive or selective. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25: 350–350.
Tabossi P. 1988. Effects of context on the immediate interpretation of unambiguous nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 14: 153–162.
Tabossi P., L. Colombo, R. Job 1987. Accessing lexical ambiguity: Effects of context and dominance. Psychological Research 49: 161–167.
Taft M. 1979. Recognition on affixed words and the word-frequency effect. Memory and Cognition 7: 263–272.
Taft M. 1981. Prefix stripping revisited. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20: 289–297.
Taft M., K. I. Forster 1975. Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14: 638–647.
Taft M., K. I. Forster 1976. Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 15: 607–620.
Tanenhaus M. K., J. M. Leiman, M. S. Seidenberg 1979. Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 427–440.
Thorndike E. L. 1931. Other facts concerning mental connections: Conditioned reflexes and learning. New York: The Century.
Thuma O. 2001. A kétértelműségek a morfológiai feldologzásban. In: Pléh –
Lukács (2001, 98–114).
Thuma O. 2008. Gyakorisági hatások és nyelvi kétértelműségek vizsgálata a mentális szótárban magyar nyelven. Doktori értekezés, ELTE, Budapest.
Thuma O., Cs. Pléh 2000. Ambiguity and morphological decomposition in Hungarian. In: Ch. Schaner-WollesJ. Rennison –
F. Neubarth (szerk.): Naturally! Linguistic essays in honour of Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler on the occasion of his 60th birthday. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier. 128–142.
Titchener E. B. 2004. A gondolkodás kísérleti pszichológiája. In: Pléh Cs. –
M. Győri (szerk.): Olvasmányok a kísérleti pszichológia történetéhez. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó. 256–265.
Tsapkini K., G. Jarema, E. Kehayia 2004. Regularity re-revisited: Modality matters. Brain and Language 89: 611–616.
Tyler L. K., W. D. Marslen-Wilson 1986. The effects of context on the recognition of polymorphemic words. Journal of Memory and Language 25: 741–752.
Ullman M. T. 1999. Acceptability ratings of regular and irregular past tense forms: Evidence for a dual system model of language. From word frequency and phonological neighborhood effects. Language and Cognitive Processes 14: 47–67.
Ullman M. T. 2001. A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Nature Review Neuroscience 2: 717–726.
Ullman M. T. 2004. Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition 92: 231–270.
Ure J. N. 1971. Lexical density and register differentiation. In: G. E. PerrenJ. L. M. Trim (szerk.): Applications of linguistics: Selected papers of the 2nd International Congress of Linguistics, Cambridge 1969. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 443–452.
Vannest J., R. Bertram, J. Järvikivi, J. Niemi 2002. Counterintuitive cross-linguistic differences: More morphological computation in English than in Finnish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31: 83–106.
Vitevitch M. S., P. A. Luce, J. Charles-Luce, D. Kemmerer 1997. Phonotactics and syllable stress: Implications for the processing of spoken nonsense words. Language and Speech 40: 47–62.
Vu H., G. Kellas, S. T. Paul 1998. Sources of sentence constraint on lexical ambiguity resolution. Memory and Cognition 26: 979–1001.
Warren R. M. 1970. Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science 167: 392–393.
Wheeler D. 1970. Processes in word recognition. Cognitive Psychology 1: 59–85.
Winnick W. A., S. A. Daniel 1970. Two kinds of response priming in tachistoscopic recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology 84: 76–81.
Yuille J. C., R. H. Barnsley 1969. Visual, auditory and tactual imagery in paired associate learning. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Psychology. London: Methuen. 215.
Zipf G. K. 1949. Human behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Cambridge MA: Addison-Wesley Press.